Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Impact of Large Language Model Assistance on Patients Reading Clinical Notes: A Mixed-Methods Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.09637 v2 pith:3ECS3VRE submitted 2024-01-17 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CL
keywords notesclinicalpatientsaugmentationstoolbreastcancerhistory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have immense potential to make information more accessible, particularly in medicine, where complex medical jargon can hinder patient comprehension of clinical notes. We developed a patient-facing tool using LLMs to make clinical notes more readable by simplifying, extracting information from, and adding context to the notes. We piloted the tool with clinical notes donated by patients with a history of breast cancer and synthetic notes from a clinician. Participants (N=200, healthy, female-identifying patients) were randomly assigned three clinical notes in our tool with varying levels of augmentations and answered quantitative and qualitative questions evaluating their understanding of follow-up actions. Augmentations significantly increased their quantitative understanding scores. In-depth interviews were conducted with participants (N=7, patients with a history of breast cancer), revealing both positive sentiments about the augmentations and concerns about AI. We also performed a qualitative clinician-driven analysis of the model's error modes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative AI in Medicine

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A stakeholder-based review of generative AI use cases in medicine and the consent, privacy, transparency, hallucination, usability, equity, evaluation, and accountability challenges that stand between prototypes and s...

Pith tools