Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HAZARD Challenge: Embodied Decision Making in Dynamically Changing Environments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.12975 v1 pith:URYTGZRC submitted 2024-01-23 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords agentsenvironmentshazardembodiedchallengechangingdecision-makingdynamically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in high-fidelity virtual environments serve as one of the major driving forces for building intelligent embodied agents to perceive, reason and interact with the physical world. Typically, these environments remain unchanged unless agents interact with them. However, in real-world scenarios, agents might also face dynamically changing environments characterized by unexpected events and need to rapidly take action accordingly. To remedy this gap, we propose a new simulated embodied benchmark, called HAZARD, specifically designed to assess the decision-making abilities of embodied agents in dynamic situations. HAZARD consists of three unexpected disaster scenarios, including fire, flood, and wind, and specifically supports the utilization of large language models (LLMs) to assist common sense reasoning and decision-making. This benchmark enables us to evaluate autonomous agents' decision-making capabilities across various pipelines, including reinforcement learning (RL), rule-based, and search-based methods in dynamically changing environments. As a first step toward addressing this challenge using large language models, we further develop an LLM-based agent and perform an in-depth analysis of its promise and challenge of solving these challenging tasks. HAZARD is available at https://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/hazard/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TSHA: A Benchmark for Visual Language Models in Trustworthy Safety Hazard Assessment Scenarios

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    TSHA is a new 80,000-pair benchmark for indoor safety hazard assessment; current vision-language models score roughly 45-85, and fine-tuning on TSHA raised Qwen2.5-VL-3B by 18.3 points on TSHA's test set.

  2. SENTINEL: A Multi-Level Formal Framework for Safety Evaluation of Foundation Model-based Embodied Agents

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-level temporal-logic safety evaluator for embodied LLM agents that checks NL-to-LTL interpretation, plan compliance, and CTL over simulated execution trees.

Pith tools