Finetuning Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detection
read the original abstract
This paper presents the results of finetuning large language models (LLMs) for the task of detecting vulnerabilities in source code. We leverage WizardCoder, a recent improvement of the state-of-the-art LLM StarCoder, and adapt it for vulnerability detection through further finetuning. To accelerate training, we modify WizardCoder's training procedure, also we investigate optimal training regimes. For the imbalanced dataset with many more negative examples than positive, we also explore different techniques to improve classification performance. The finetuned WizardCoder model achieves improvement in ROC AUC and F1 measures on balanced and imbalanced vulnerability datasets over CodeBERT-like model, demonstrating the effectiveness of adapting pretrained LLMs for vulnerability detection in source code. The key contributions are finetuning the state-of-the-art code LLM, WizardCoder, increasing its training speed without the performance harm, optimizing the training procedure and regimes, handling class imbalance, and improving performance on difficult vulnerability detection datasets. This demonstrates the potential for transfer learning by finetuning large pretrained language models for specialized source code analysis tasks.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
VulKey: Automated Vulnerability Repair Guided by Domain-Specific Repair Patterns
VulKey reaches 31.5% repair accuracy on real C/C++ vulnerabilities by matching hierarchical expert patterns to guide LLM patch generation, beating prior baselines by 7.6%.
-
VulKey: Automated Vulnerability Repair Guided by Domain-Specific Repair Patterns
VulKey introduces hierarchical expert knowledge abstractions to guide LLMs in vulnerability repair, reporting 31.5% accuracy on PrimeVul (7.6% above best baseline) and strong results on Vul4J.
-
Words Speak Louder Than Code: Investigating Cognitive Heuristics in LLM-Based Code Vulnerability Detection
LLMs for code vulnerability detection show average susceptibility of 33.2% to framing, 23.5% to anchoring, and 18.4% to halo effects, with a black-box attack suppressing up to 97% of detections.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.