Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLM-Enhanced Data Management

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02643 v1 pith:J6UCXT2K submitted 2024-02-04 cs.DB cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.DBcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords llmdbdatahighmanagementaccuracycostdatabasegeneralizability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning (ML) techniques for optimizing data management problems have been extensively studied and widely deployed in recent five years. However traditional ML methods have limitations on generalizability (adapting to different scenarios) and inference ability (understanding the context). Fortunately, large language models (LLMs) have shown high generalizability and human-competitive abilities in understanding context, which are promising for data management tasks (e.g., database diagnosis, database tuning). However, existing LLMs have several limitations: hallucination, high cost, and low accuracy for complicated tasks. To address these challenges, we design LLMDB, an LLM-enhanced data management paradigm which has generalizability and high inference ability while avoiding hallucination, reducing LLM cost, and achieving high accuracy. LLMDB embeds domain-specific knowledge to avoid hallucination by LLM fine-tuning and prompt engineering. LLMDB reduces the high cost of LLMs by vector databases which provide semantic search and caching abilities. LLMDB improves the task accuracy by LLM agent which provides multiple-round inference and pipeline executions. We showcase three real-world scenarios that LLMDB can well support, including query rewrite, database diagnosis and data analytics. We also summarize the open research challenges of LLMDB.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating LLMs in Database Scenarios: A Lifecycle Benchmark for Assessing Their Potential in Core Database Tasks

    cs.DB 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    DBLifeBench, a five-phase database lifecycle benchmark, shows SQL-specialized LLMs underperform general-purpose LLMs on non-query tasks such as schema design and system maintenance.

  2. Memory Offloading for Large Language Model Inference with Latency SLO Guarantees

    cs.DC 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Select-N meets LLM latency SLOs by choosing and continuously adjusting an offloading interval that controls how much model state lives in CPU memory, increasing host memory usage and throughput versus prior offloading...

  3. A Survey of AIOps in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic survey that categorizes LLM-based AIOps research into four dimensions: data sources, tasks, methods, and evaluation, claiming to be the first comprehensive such overview.

Pith tools