REVIEW 3 cited by
Uncertainty-Aware Explainable Recommendation with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Providing explanations within the recommendation system would boost user satisfaction and foster trust, especially by elaborating on the reasons for selecting recommended items tailored to the user. The predominant approach in this domain revolves around generating text-based explanations, with a notable emphasis on applying large language models (LLMs). However, refining LLMs for explainable recommendations proves impractical due to time constraints and computing resource limitations. As an alternative, the current approach involves training the prompt rather than the LLM. In this study, we developed a model that utilizes the ID vectors of user and item inputs as prompts for GPT-2. We employed a joint training mechanism within a multi-task learning framework to optimize both the recommendation task and explanation task. This strategy enables a more effective exploration of users' interests, improving recommendation effectiveness and user satisfaction. Through the experiments, our method achieving 1.59 DIV, 0.57 USR and 0.41 FCR on the Yelp, TripAdvisor and Amazon dataset respectively, demonstrates superior performance over four SOTA methods in terms of explainability evaluation metric. In addition, we identified that the proposed model is able to ensure stable textual quality on the three public datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
"This Suits You the Best": Query Focused Comparative Explainable Summarization
A two-stage LLM pipeline generates query-focused comparative summaries of recommended products, with an evaluation method that reaches 0.74 Spearman correlation with human judgments.
-
Mind the XAI Gap: A Human-Centered LLM Framework for Democratizing Explainable AI
An in-context LLM framework that produces dual expert and non-expert explanations, evaluated on well-being clustering with a user study and LIME-alignment metrics.
-
Rule-Based Moral Principles for Explaining Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation
A virtue-labeled lookup table maps coarse uncertainty tags to canned warnings or disclaimers; the only quantitative result is 50% tag accuracy on 20 author-written prompts, with trust improvements asserted but untested.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.