Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Index-Based Treatment Allocation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11771 v1 pith:EMSFBWGN submitted 2024-02-19 cs.LG cs.AIstat.MEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.MEstat.ML
keywords allocationmethodspoliciesresourcesstatisticalconclusionscontroleffectiveness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When resources are scarce, an allocation policy is needed to decide who receives a resource. This problem occurs, for instance, when allocating scarce medical resources and is often solved using modern ML methods. This paper introduces methods to evaluate index-based allocation policies -- that allocate a fixed number of resources to those who need them the most -- by using data from a randomized control trial. Such policies create dependencies between agents, which render the assumptions behind standard statistical tests invalid and limit the effectiveness of estimators. Addressing these challenges, we translate and extend recent ideas from the statistics literature to present an efficient estimator and methods for computing asymptotically correct confidence intervals. This enables us to effectively draw valid statistical conclusions, a critical gap in previous work. Our extensive experiments validate our methodology in practical settings, while also showcasing its statistical power. We conclude by proposing and empirically verifying extensions of our methodology that enable us to reevaluate a past randomized control trial to evaluate different ML allocation policies in the context of a mHealth program, drawing previously invisible conclusions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Value of Prediction in Identifying the Worst-Off

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Expanding screening capacity often improves identification of the worst-off more than improving prediction accuracy, except when predictions are very bad or nearly perfect.

  2. Beyond Listenership: AI-Predicted Interventions Drive Improvements in Maternal Health Behaviours

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    AI-chosen live calls improved maternal health message listenership, but the claimed downstream health behavior gains rest on a few uncorrected tests and a self-selected survey sample.

Pith tools