REVIEW 2 cited by
Uncertainty quantification in fine-tuned LLMs using LoRA ensembles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fine-tuning large language models can improve task specific performance, although a general understanding of what the fine-tuned model has learned, forgotten and how to trust its predictions is still missing. We derive principled uncertainty quantification for fine-tuned LLMs with posterior approximations using computationally efficient low-rank adaptation ensembles. We analyze three common multiple-choice datasets using low-rank adaptation ensembles based on Mistral-7b, and draw quantitative and qualitative conclusions on their perceived complexity and balance between retained prior knowledge and domain specific adaptation during and after fine-tuning. We identify unexpected retention of acquired knowledge during fine-tuning in the overfitting regime.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Alignment Auditor: A Bayesian Framework for Verifying and Refining LLM Objectives
Bayesian IRL with sequential posterior updates can recover a usable toxicity-reduction reward from LLM demonstrations and reproduce ground-truth RLHF detoxification.
-
ChemAU: Harness the Reasoning of LLMs in Chemical Research with Adaptive Uncertainty Estimation
ChemAU adds a position penalty to token-level uncertainty estimates so that flagged reasoning steps are corrected by a fine-tuned chemistry model, reporting improved accuracy on GPQA, MMLU-Pro, and SuperGPQA chemistry...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.