Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Event-level Knowledge Editing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13093 v2 pith:L2MUZKP6 submitted 2024-02-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords knowledgeeditingllmsevent-levelfactualeditseventtriplets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge editing aims at updating knowledge of large language models (LLMs) to prevent them from becoming outdated. Existing work edits LLMs at the level of factual knowledge triplets. However, natural knowledge updates in the real world come from the occurrences of new events rather than direct changes in factual triplets. In this paper, we propose a new task setting: event-level knowledge editing, which directly edits new events into LLMs and improves over conventional triplet-level editing on (1) Efficiency. A single event edit leads to updates in multiple entailed knowledge triplets. (2) Completeness. Beyond updating factual knowledge, event-level editing also requires considering the event influences and updating LLMs' knowledge about future trends. We construct a high-quality event-level editing benchmark ELKEN, consisting of 1,515 event edits, 6,449 questions about factual knowledge, and 10,150 questions about future tendencies. We systematically evaluate the performance of various knowledge editing methods and LLMs on this benchmark. We find that ELKEN poses significant challenges to existing knowledge editing approaches. Our codes and dataset are publicly released to facilitate further research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. COMPKE: Complex Question Answering under Knowledge Editing

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    COMPKE is a new benchmark with 11,924 complex questions that tests knowledge editing through one-to-many relations and logical operations, where existing editing methods often fail.

  2. ScEdit: Script-based Assessment of Knowledge Editing

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A script-based benchmark reveals that knowledge-editing methods perform far worse on 'How' style procedural questions than on the fact-recall questions used in standard evaluations.

  3. Break Through the Compression Bottleneck: From Theory to Practice

    cs.CL 2026-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper asserts a first proof that low-rank decomposition and quantization are non-orthogonal tools for LLM compression, recommends low-rank-first ordering, and adds a diagonal scaling fix (DAM) that reduces the com...

  4. Benchmarking and Rethinking Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Under autoregressive and sequential editing, parameter-based knowledge editing methods perform poorly, while the retrieval-based SCR baseline consistently outperforms them across datasets and models.

Pith tools