Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

An Empirical Categorization of Prompting Techniques for Large Language Models: A Practitioner's Guide

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14837 v1 pith:6DMHAABB submitted 2024-02-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords techniquesllmspromptpromptingcategorizationeffectivemodelspractitioners
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to rapid advancements in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), programming these models with prompts has recently gained significant attention. However, the sheer number of available prompt engineering techniques creates an overwhelming landscape for practitioners looking to utilize these tools. For the most efficient and effective use of LLMs, it is important to compile a comprehensive list of prompting techniques and establish a standardized, interdisciplinary categorization framework. In this survey, we examine some of the most well-known prompting techniques from both academic and practical viewpoints and classify them into seven distinct categories. We present an overview of each category, aiming to clarify their unique contributions and showcase their practical applications in real-world examples in order to equip fellow practitioners with a structured framework for understanding and categorizing prompting techniques tailored to their specific domains. We believe that this approach will help simplify the complex landscape of prompt engineering and enable more effective utilization of LLMs in various applications. By providing practitioners with a systematic approach to prompt categorization, we aim to assist in navigating the intricacies of effective prompt design for conversational pre-trained LLMs and inspire new possibilities in their respective fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thinking beyond the anthropomorphic paradigm benefits LLM research

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Anthropomorphic language and assumptions are common and growing in LLM research, and the authors propose a framework for moving beyond them while keeping what is useful.

  2. Leveraging Multimodal LLM for Inspirational User Interface Search

    cs.HC 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A GPT-4o-based system extracts UI semantics from screenshots and provides semantic search for mobile UI design inspiration, beating CLIP-based retrieval in designer ratings.

  3. Red-Teaming Coding Agents from a Tool-Invocation Perspective: An Empirical Security Assessment

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Attacker-controlled tool descriptions and return values can hijack tool invocation in popular LLM coding agents, yielding remote code execution and denial of service.

  4. Prompt Engineering for Requirements Engineering: A Literature Review and Roadmap

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The first roadmap-oriented systematic literature review of prompt engineering for requirements engineering analyzes 35 studies and proposes a hybrid taxonomy and research roadmap.

  5. Towards Detecting Prompt Knowledge Gaps for Improved LLM-guided Issue Resolution

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In conversations linked to open GitHub issues, 44.6% of developer prompts contain knowledge gaps, versus 12.6% in conversations linked to closed issues; Missing Context is the most common gap.

Pith tools