Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

PhyPlan: Compositional and Adaptive Physical Task Reasoning with Physics-Informed Skill Networks for Robot Manipulators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.15767 v1 pith:LIBGABS5 submitted 2024-02-24 cs.RO cs.AI

classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords phyplanphysicalreasoningphysics-informedtasksapproachcompareddemonstrates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given the task of positioning a ball-like object to a goal region beyond direct reach, humans can often throw, slide, or rebound objects against the wall to attain the goal. However, enabling robots to reason similarly is non-trivial. Existing methods for physical reasoning are data-hungry and struggle with complexity and uncertainty inherent in the real world. This paper presents PhyPlan, a novel physics-informed planning framework that combines physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) with modified Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to enable embodied agents to perform dynamic physical tasks. PhyPlan leverages PINNs to simulate and predict outcomes of actions in a fast and accurate manner and uses MCTS for planning. It dynamically determines whether to consult a PINN-based simulator (coarse but fast) or engage directly with the actual environment (fine but slow) to determine optimal policy. Evaluation with robots in simulated 3D environments demonstrates the ability of our approach to solve 3D-physical reasoning tasks involving the composition of dynamic skills. Quantitatively, PhyPlan excels in several aspects: (i) it achieves lower regret when learning novel tasks compared to state-of-the-art, (ii) it expedites skill learning and enhances the speed of physical reasoning, (iii) it demonstrates higher data efficiency compared to a physics un-informed approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mulberry: Empowering MLLM with o1-like Reasoning and Reflection via Collective Monte Carlo Tree Search

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a group of MLLMs to search reasoning trees and training on the resulting paths improves MLLM reasoning, with Mulberry models beating their base models by up to 7.5 points on average.

  2. MC-NEST: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models leveraging a Monte Carlo Self-Refine Tree

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    MC-NEST adds a constant probability term to MCTSr's node selection and reports improved AIME pass@1 for GPT-4o, but the numbers are weakened by test-set rollout tuning and internal inconsistencies.

Pith tools