Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 cited by

ToolNet: Connecting Large Language Models with Massive Tools via Tool Graph

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.00839 v1 pith:WYWTALTS submitted 2024-02-29 cs.AI cs.CL

ToolNet: Connecting Large Language Models with Massive Tools via Tool Graph

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords toolstoolllmstoolnetgraphmassivechallenginglanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While achieving remarkable progress in a broad range of tasks, large language models (LLMs) remain significantly limited in properly using massive external tools. Existing in-context learning approaches simply format tools into a list of plain text descriptions and input them to LLMs, from which, LLMs generate a sequence of tool calls to solve problems step by step. Such a paradigm ignores the intrinsic dependency between tools and offloads all reasoning loads to LLMs, making them restricted to a limited number of specifically designed tools. It thus remains challenging for LLMs to operate on a library of massive tools, casting a great limitation when confronted with real-world scenarios. This paper proposes ToolNet, a plug-and-play framework that scales up the number of tools to thousands with a moderate increase in token consumption. ToolNet organizes tools into a directed graph. Each node represents a tool, and weighted edges denote tool transition. Starting from an initial tool node, an LLM navigates in the graph by iteratively choosing the next one from its successors until the task is resolved. Extensive experiments show that ToolNet can achieve impressive results in challenging multi-hop tool learning datasets and is resilient to tool failures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RS-Claw: Progressive Active Tool Exploration via Hierarchical Skill Trees for Remote Sensing Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RS-Claw enables remote sensing agents to actively explore tools via hierarchical skill trees, achieving up to 86% token compression and outperforming flat registration and RAG baselines on Earth-Bench.

  2. Dynamic Tool Dependency Retrieval for Lightweight Function Calling

    cs.LG 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DTDR dynamically retrieves relevant tools by modeling dependencies from demonstrations and conditioning on the evolving agent plan, improving function calling success rates by 23-104% over static retrievers across benchmarks.

  3. GRAFT: Graph-Tokenized LLMs for Tool Planning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GRAFT internalizes tool dependency graphs via dedicated special tokens in LLMs and applies on-policy context distillation to achieve higher exact sequence matching and dependency legality than prior external-graph methods.

  4. Group of Skills: Group-Structured Skill Retrieval for Agent Skill Libraries

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GoSkills converts flat skill lists into role-labeled execution contexts via anchor-centered groups and graph expansion, preserving coverage and improving rewards on SkillsBench and ALFWorld under small skill budgets.

  5. Bidirectional Semantic Complementary Tool Retrieval for Remote Sensing Agents

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A bidirectional semantic complementary tool retrieval method using planning-based query enhancement and dynamic tool dependency graphs with neighborhood aggregation improves retrieval accuracy on remote sensing and ge...

  6. An Agentic Approach to Metadata Reasoning

    cs.DB 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Metadata Reasoner uses agentic LLM reasoning on metadata to select sufficient and minimal data sources, achieving 83.16% F1 on KramaBench and 85.5% F1 on noisy synthetic benchmarks while avoiding low-quality tables 99...

  7. Experience-Evolving Multi-Turn Tool-Use Agent with Hybrid Episodic-Procedural Memory

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    An LLM agent that builds a tool-transition graph with state summaries from past experience improves tool selection and RL exploration by large margins on multi-turn benchmarks.

  8. NaviAgent: Bilevel Planning on Tool Navigation Graph for Large-Scale Orchestration

    cs.AI 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NaviAgent decouples task planning from tool execution via a Tool World Navigation Model graph to improve scalability and success rates in LLM agents handling large tool ecosystems.

  9. Execution-First Synthetic Tool-Use Trace Generation for LLM Agents

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    An execution-first data generator that validates tool traces before synthesizing user tasks improves Qwen agents' tool use and answer quality, with masked reasoning supervision beating full-trace supervision.

  10. Code as Agent Harness

    cs.CL 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    A survey that organizes existing work on LLM-based agents around code as the central harness, structured in three layers of interfaces, mechanisms, and multi-agent scaling, with applications across domains and listed ...

  11. Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering

    cs.SE 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    LLM agent progress depends on externalizing cognitive functions into memory, skills, protocols, and harness engineering that coordinates them reliably.

  12. IEA: Amateur-Friendly Conversational Image Editing Agent via Three Stages of Multitask Alignment

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    IEA is a tool-calling VLM for conversational image editing trained in three multitask stages that reports lower pixel distance, higher ROUGE-L, and top user-study rankings versus baselines.

  13. Position: How can Graphs Help Large Language Models?

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Graphs can help LLMs reduce hallucinations, boost reasoning via prompting techniques, and better process structured data.

  14. LLMs+Graphs: Toward Graph-Native, Synergistic AI Systems

    cs.DB 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper synthesizes three synergies between LLMs and graphs—augmented retrieval/reasoning, bidirectional KG integration, and graph-enhanced agents—plus LLM uses in graph data management and ML.