REVIEW 3 cited by
From Melting Pots to Misrepresentations: Exploring Harms in Generative AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the widespread adoption of advanced generative models such as Gemini and GPT, there has been a notable increase in the incorporation of such models into sociotechnical systems, categorized under AI-as-a-Service (AIaaS). Despite their versatility across diverse sectors, concerns persist regarding discriminatory tendencies within these models, particularly favoring selected `majority' demographics across various sociodemographic dimensions. Despite widespread calls for diversification of media representations, marginalized racial and ethnic groups continue to face persistent distortion, stereotyping, and neglect within the AIaaS context. In this work, we provide a critical summary of the state of research in the context of social harms to lead the conversation to focus on their implications. We also present open-ended research questions, guided by our discussion, to help define future research pathways.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Investigating Social Bias in Narrative Image Generation
Across six text-to-image models, stereotyped outputs rise from 25.9% of single photos to about 36% of storyboards and 44% of four-panel comics, with bias expressed through plot, character placement, and dialogue.
-
Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research
Randomized survey wording makes social scientists report more familiarity but less trust in "AI" than in "machine learning", with ethical concerns concentrated on generative AI.
-
Breaking Down Bias: On The Limits of Generalizable Pruning Strategies
Pruning-based bias removal in Llama-3-8B reduces racial bias mainly in the context used to choose what to prune, and transfers poorly across contexts.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.