REVIEW 2 cited by
Vocabulary Attack to Hijack Large Language Model Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The fast advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) are driving an increasing number of applications. Together with the growing number of users, we also see an increasing number of attackers who try to outsmart these systems. They want the model to reveal confidential information, specific false information, or offensive behavior. To this end, they manipulate their instructions for the LLM by inserting separators or rephrasing them systematically until they reach their goal. Our approach is different. It inserts words from the model vocabulary. We find these words using an optimization procedure and embeddings from another LLM (attacker LLM). We prove our approach by goal hijacking two popular open-source LLMs from the Llama2 and the Flan-T5 families, respectively. We present two main findings. First, our approach creates inconspicuous instructions and therefore it is hard to detect. For many attack cases, we find that even a single word insertion is sufficient. Second, we demonstrate that we can conduct our attack using a different model than the target model to conduct our attack with.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents
A survey proposing a source-and-impact taxonomy (input, model, combined; security, privacy, ethics) for threats to LLM-based agents, with feature analysis and four case studies.
-
A Survey of Attacks on Large Language Models
A narrative survey that taxonomizes adversarial attacks on LLMs and LLM-based agents into training, inference, and availability/integrity phases with associated defenses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.