Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MMInA: Benchmarking Multihop Multimodal Internet Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.09992 v2 pith:NWNHH7EE submitted 2024-04-15 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords tasksagentsmultihopmultimodalwebsitesevolvinginternetmmina
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous embodied agents live on an Internet of multimedia websites. Can they hop around multimodal websites to complete complex user tasks? Existing benchmarks fail to assess them in a realistic, evolving environment for their embodiment across websites. To answer this question, we present MMInA, a multihop and multimodal benchmark to evaluate the embodied agents for compositional Internet tasks, with several appealing properties: 1) Evolving real-world multimodal websites. Our benchmark uniquely operates on evolving real-world websites, ensuring a high degree of realism and applicability to natural user tasks. Our data includes 1,050 human-written tasks covering various domains such as shopping and travel, with each task requiring the agent to extract multimodal information from web pages as observations autonomously; 2) Multihop web browsing. Our dataset features naturally compositional tasks that require information from or actions on multiple websites to solve, to assess long-range reasoning capabilities on web tasks; 3) Holistic evaluation. We propose a novel protocol for evaluating an agent's progress in completing multihop tasks. We experiment with both standalone (multimodal) language models and heuristic-based web agents. Extensive experiments demonstrate that while long-chain multihop web tasks are easy for humans, they remain challenging for state-of-the-art web agents. We identify that agents are more likely to fail on the early hops when solving tasks with more hops, which results in lower task success rates. To address this issue, we propose a simple memory augmentation approach that replays past action trajectories to reflect. Our method significantly improves the performance of both the single-hop and multihop web browsing abilities. Our code and data are available at github.com/shulin16/MMInA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Simple QA to Deep Research: A Verifiable Benchmark Constructed through Iterative Task Evolution

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An automatic pipeline evolves simple QA questions into 500 deep-research tasks with DAG-structured, fact-grounded rubrics that discriminate between models.

  2. DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agents

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DeepShop, a benchmark of 150 complex online shopping queries with fine-grained evaluation, shows that leading web agents and deep research systems achieve at most a 32% task success rate.

  3. WebChoreArena: Evaluating Web Browsing Agents on Realistic Tedious Web Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WebChoreArena adds 532 human-curated, memory-intensive tasks to WebArena's reproducible environments, and current LLM agents score 2.6% to 44.9%, much lower than on WebArena.

  4. Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review that proposes a two-dimensional taxonomy for evaluating LLM agents and highlights enterprise-specific evaluation gaps.

Pith tools