Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Dubo-SQL: Diverse Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Fine Tuning for Text-to-SQL

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.12560 v1 pith:DPG7Z3MS submitted 2024-04-19 cs.CL cs.DB

classification cs.CLcs.DB
keywords dubo-sqlperformancebird-sqlfinehighermethodstext-to-sqltuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The current state-of-the-art (SOTA) for automated text-to-SQL still falls well short of expert human performance as measured by execution accuracy (EX) on the BIRD-SQL benchmark. The most accurate methods are also slow and expensive. To advance the SOTA for text-to-SQL while reducing cost and improving speed, we explore the combination of low-cost fine tuning, novel methods for diverse retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and new input and output formats that help large language models (LLMs) achieve higher EX. We introduce two new methods, Dubo-SQL v1 and v2. Dubo-SQL v1 sets a new record for EX on the holdout test set of BIRD-SQL. Dubo-SQL v2 achieves even higher performance on the BIRD-SQL dev set. Dubo-SQL v1 relies on LLMs from OpenAI, but uses the low-cost GPT-3.5 Turbo while exceeding the performance of the next-best model using OpenAI, which instead uses the more expensive GPT-4. Dubo-SQL v1 exceeds the performance of the next-best model using GPT-3.5 by over 20%. Dubo-SQL v2 uses GPT-4 Turbo and RAG in place of fine tuning to push EX higher.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ErrorLLM: Modeling SQL Errors for Text-to-SQL Refinement

    cs.CL 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned model with special error tokens detects SQL mistakes and guides LLMs to fix them, raising execution accuracy on BIRD from 55.87% to 66.23% and on Spider from 75.44% to 86.94% over GPT-4o.

  2. Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review organizing LLM-based text-to-SQL methods into pre-processing, in-context learning, fine-tuning, and post-processing paradigms, with a catalog of datasets, metrics, challenges, and future directions.

  3. Meta-aware Learning in text-to-SQL Large Language Model

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Combining schema, chain-of-thought, metadata knowledge, and tokenized prompt structures during fine-tuning improves text-to-SQL execution accuracy on private business databases compared to schema-only fine-tuning.

Pith tools