REVIEW 8 cited by
STRIDE: A Tool-Assisted LLM Agent Framework for Strategic and Interactive Decision-Making
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have revolutionized natural language processing, showing remarkable linguistic proficiency and reasoning capabilities. However, their application in strategic multi-agent decision-making environments is hampered by significant limitations including poor mathematical reasoning, difficulty in following instructions, and a tendency to generate incorrect information. These deficiencies hinder their performance in strategic and interactive tasks that demand adherence to nuanced game rules, long-term planning, exploration in unknown environments, and anticipation of opponents' moves. To overcome these obstacles, this paper presents a novel LLM agent framework equipped with memory and specialized tools to enhance their strategic decision-making capabilities. We deploy the tools in a number of economically important environments, in particular bilateral bargaining and multi-agent and dynamic mechanism design. We employ quantitative metrics to assess the framework's performance in various strategic decision-making problems. Our findings establish that our enhanced framework significantly improves the strategic decision-making capability of LLMs. While we highlight the inherent limitations of current LLM models, we demonstrate the improvements through targeted enhancements, suggesting a promising direction for future developments in LLM applications for interactive environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Training with (Swap) Regret Loss in a Single-Layer Self-Attention Model: A Case Study on the Probability Simplex
Training single-layer attention with squared regret loss has stationary points that implement smoothed fictitious play (external regret) and, via a new swap-regret loss, the Blum–Mansour no-swap-regret algorithm.
-
Instruction-Conditioned Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Self-Distillation to an Unconditioned Policy
Training with appended behavioral instructions plus correctness-filtered self-distillation improves held-out math pass@1 over DAPO for a 1.7B model, but not for 4B at 4K context.
-
Strategic Bargaining in Multi-Buyer Markets: Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards for LLM Negotiations
RLVR training teaches a 30B LLM to strategically explore a multi-buyer market and extract 70% of available surplus, outperforming frontier models up to 1T parameters in concurrent negotiation.
-
Estimating the Empowerment of Language Model Agents
EELMA estimates the mutual information between an LM agent's actions and future text states, and this 'empowerment' is shown to correlate with task performance across toy games and WebArena.
-
A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solving
A literature survey that classifies LLM-based optimization research into modeling and solving, with solving divided into LLMs as optimizers, low-level components, and high-level managers.
-
Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives
A survey proposes a macro-meso-micro value framework for agentic AI alignment and maps applications, methods, and benchmarks onto it.
-
The World As Large Language Models See It: Exploring the reliability of LLMs in representing geographical features
GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash approximate the geography of Austria but show systematic biases in coordinates and elevations and frequent errors in assigning federal states.
-
Agentic AI Systems Applied to tasks in Financial Services: Modeling and model risk management crews
A CrewAI-based multi-agent system with human oversight built financial models and carried out model risk management checks on three public credit datasets, with results comparable to AutoML and Kaggle baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.