Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Offline Regularised Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19107 v1 pith:3QOXZ4BQ submitted 2024-05-29 cs.LG cs.AI

Offline Regularised Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models Alignment

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords promptdatasetselementfeedbackhumanlanguagemodelsoptimisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The dominant framework for alignment of large language models (LLM), whether through reinforcement learning from human feedback or direct preference optimisation, is to learn from preference data. This involves building datasets where each element is a quadruplet composed of a prompt, two independent responses (completions of the prompt) and a human preference between the two independent responses, yielding a preferred and a dis-preferred response. Such data is typically scarce and expensive to collect. On the other hand, \emph{single-trajectory} datasets where each element is a triplet composed of a prompt, a response and a human feedback is naturally more abundant. The canonical element of such datasets is for instance an LLM's response to a user's prompt followed by a user's feedback such as a thumbs-up/down. Consequently, in this work, we propose DRO, or \emph{Direct Reward Optimisation}, as a framework and associated algorithms that do not require pairwise preferences. DRO uses a simple mean-squared objective that can be implemented in various ways. We validate our findings empirically, using T5 encoder-decoder language models, and show DRO's performance over selected baselines such as Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO). Thus, we confirm that DRO is a simple and empirically compelling method for single-trajectory policy optimisation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fast Rates for Offline Contextual Bandits with Forward-KL Regularization under Single-Policy Concentrability

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper establishes the first tilde O(epsilon^{-1}) upper bounds and matching lower bounds for forward-KL-regularized offline contextual bandits under single-policy concentrability in both tabular and general functi...

  2. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  3. rePIRL: Learn PRM with Inverse RL for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    rePIRL learns effective process reward models for LLM reasoning via a dual policy-PRM update process inspired by inverse RL, unifying online and offline methods with reported gains over prior approaches on math and co...

  4. Autoregressive Language Models are Secretly Energy-Based Models: Insights into the Lookahead Capabilities of Next-Token Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Autoregressive language models are equivalent to energy-based models through a bijection that corresponds to the soft Bellman equation, explaining their lookahead capabilities despite next-token training.

  5. UNA: A Unified Supervised Framework for Efficient LLM Alignment Across Feedback Types

    cs.LG 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    UNA unifies binary, pairwise, and score-based feedback for LLM alignment via a generalized implicit reward function shown optimal by the log sum inequality.

  6. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    By replaying teacher prefixes with a step-decay schedule, multi-turn on-policy distillation can run without live environment interaction, matching or slightly beating online OPD accuracy.

  7. Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Survey mapping RL techniques onto LLM training and highlighting gaps in value-based, off-policy, and bootstrapping methods.

  8. Trust Region On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.

  9. Autoregressive Language Models are Secretly Energy-Based Models: Insights into the Lookahead Capabilities of Next-Token Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    Under the chain rule of probability, autoregressive models and energy-based models are in exact bijection in function space, making the global optimum of teacher forcing equivalent to an energy-based model with implic...

  10. rePIRL: Learn PRM with Inverse RL for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0

    rePIRL learns token-level process rewards for LLM reasoning via a guided-cost-learning-style IRL objective, and shows these rewards improve reasoning policies on math/coding benchmarks.