REVIEW 2 cited by
Bridging Language Gaps in Audio-Text Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Audio-text retrieval is a challenging task, requiring the search for an audio clip or a text caption within a database. The predominant focus of existing research on English descriptions poses a limitation on the applicability of such models, given the abundance of non-English content in real-world data. To address these linguistic disparities, we propose a language enhancement (LE), using a multilingual text encoder (SONAR) to encode the text data with language-specific information. Additionally, we optimize the audio encoder through the application of consistent ensemble distillation (CED), enhancing support for variable-length audio-text retrieval. Our methodology excels in English audio-text retrieval, demonstrating state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on commonly used datasets such as AudioCaps and Clotho. Simultaneously, the approach exhibits proficiency in retrieving content in seven other languages with only 10% of additional language-enhanced training data, yielding promising results. The source code is publicly available https://github.com/zyyan4/ml-clap.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Audio-Language Models for Audio-Centric Tasks: A Systematic Survey
A systematic survey that categorizes audio-language models by architecture, training objective, and application, covering speech, music, and general audio.
-
AudioSetCaps: An Enriched Audio-Caption Dataset using Automated Generation Pipeline with Large Audio and Language Models
An automated pipeline produced AudioSetCaps, a 1.9 million pair audio-caption dataset, and training on it improved audio-text retrieval and audio captioning benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.