pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.13043 · v2 · submitted 2024-06-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Inferring neutron star properties through gravitational waves from r-modes and their relativistic counterparts

Dhanvarsh Annamalai , Rana Nandi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron starsgravitational wavesr-modesparameter inferenceuniversal relationscompactnessequation of state
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two frameworks allow inferring neutron star properties from r-mode gravitational waves, with the second measuring distance directly using universal relations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents two methods to extract neutron star characteristics from continuous gravitational wave signals produced by r-modes and their relativistic versions. The first method uses an electromagnetic distance measurement to determine the moment of inertia, a mode saturation parameter, and a magnetic moment component. The second method instead leverages universal relations between compactness and other quantities to measure the distance itself while assuming an equation of state. This second approach avoids dependence on electromagnetic distances and yields errors that do not depend on the specific equation of state chosen.

Core claim

The authors show that axial-led hybrid modes provide additional information through a parameter kappa that obeys a universal relation with compactness, enabling a second framework where distance is inferred directly from gravitational wave data combined with pulsar frequency and an assumed equation of state, with the resulting parameter errors independent of the equation of state.

What carries the argument

The universal relation between the parameter kappa and the neutron star's compactness, together with the moment of inertia-compactness relation, which close the system of equations for parameter inference in the Fisher matrix analysis.

If this is right

  • Distance measurement errors dominate the uncertainties in the first framework for any reasonable observation time.
  • The second framework provides accurate inference without relying on electromagnetic distance data.
  • Simulated errors in the second framework remain independent of the assumed equation of state.
  • Applicability is limited to a restricted parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These methods could complement other gravitational wave observations of neutron stars by providing independent constraints on compactness.
  • If the universal relations hold more broadly, they might enable distance measurements for isolated neutron stars without electromagnetic counterparts.

Load-bearing premise

The parameter kappa satisfies a universal relation with the star's compactness that holds across the relevant neutron star models.

What would settle it

A measurement of a neutron star where the inferred distance from the second framework deviates significantly from an independent electromagnetic distance, or where errors depend on the equation of state chosen.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.13043 by Dhanvarsh Annamalai, Rana Nandi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Moment of inertia ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Inference via framework 1: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Inference via framework 1: Normalised relative errors (˜ϵ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Inference via framework 2 : Relative errors ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Inference via framework 2: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Inference via framework 1: normalised relative errors ˜ϵ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Inference via framework 2: Relative errors ˜ϵ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Inference via framework 2: Relative errors ˜ϵ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present two frameworks to infer some of the properties of neutron stars from their electromagnetic radiation and the emission of continuous gravitational waves due to r-modes and their relativistic counterparts, termed axial-led hybrid modes. In the first framework, assuming a distance measurement via electromagnetic observations, we infer three neutron star properties: the moment of inertia, a parameter related to the mode's saturation amplitude, and the component of magnetic dipole moment perpendicular to the rotation axis. Unlike signals from mountains, axial-led hybrid oscillations provide additional information through a parameter ($\kappa$) that satisfies a universal relation with the star's compactness. In the second framework, we utilize this and the relation between the moment of inertia and compactness, in addition to assuming an equation of state and utilizing pulsar frequency measurements, to directly measure the neutron star's distance, along with the parameters above. We employ a Fisher information matrix-based approach for quantitative error estimation in both frameworks. We find that the error in the distance measurement dominates the errors in the first framework for any reasonable observation time. In contrast, the second framework enables accurate parameter inference because it does not depend on electromagnetic distance measurements. Although its applicability is limited to a restricted parameter space and relies on assumptions about the equation of state, the simulated errors in this framework are found to be independent of the equation of state. Finally, we discuss the potential utility and critical limitations of our analyses, and propose possible solutions and directions for future research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents two frameworks for inferring neutron-star properties (moment of inertia, saturation-amplitude parameter, perpendicular magnetic-dipole moment, and in the second case distance) from continuous gravitational waves emitted by r-modes and axial-led hybrid modes, combined with electromagnetic observations. Framework 1 assumes an electromagnetic distance measurement and employs a Fisher-matrix analysis to estimate parameter errors. Framework 2 replaces the electromagnetic distance with the kappa-compactness and moment-of-inertia-compactness universal relations, an assumed equation of state, and pulsar frequency, again using Fisher-matrix error propagation. The central results are that distance error dominates Framework 1 for any reasonable observation time, while Framework 2 yields accurate inference whose errors are independent of the equation of state.

Significance. If the universal relations hold with negligible scatter and the modeling assumptions are satisfied, Framework 2 would provide a distance measurement from gravitational-wave data alone whose error budget is independent of the equation of state. This would be a useful addition to multi-messenger neutron-star studies, particularly for sources lacking reliable electromagnetic distances. The Fisher-matrix approach is standard and the paper correctly identifies the limited applicability of Framework 2.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4 (second framework): the claim that 'the simulated errors in this framework are found to be independent of the equation of state' is a direct consequence of imposing the kappa-compactness and I-compactness universal relations (taken from prior literature) together with a fixed EOS; once these relations close the system, EOS variation is removed by construction. The Fisher-matrix error budget does not appear to include the known few-percent scatter in these relations across EOS families, which would introduce systematic bias into the distance inference and propagate to the other parameters.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 and Eq. (universal-relation statements): the distance inference in Framework 2 reduces in part to quantities defined by the same universal relations that were originally obtained by fitting families of equations of state. This introduces a circularity that is not quantified; any residual EOS dependence or scatter in the relations would undermine both the reported accuracy and the claimed EOS independence of the errors.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the saturation-amplitude parameter and the perpendicular magnetic-dipole component should be defined explicitly at first use and kept consistent between text and equations.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that Framework 2 'does not depend on electromagnetic distance measurements,' but the pulsar frequency measurement is still required; this dependence should be stated clearly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below, agreeing on the need for clarification regarding the assumptions and limitations of Framework 2.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4 (second framework): the claim that 'the simulated errors in this framework are found to be independent of the equation of state' is a direct consequence of imposing the kappa-compactness and I-compactness universal relations (taken from prior literature) together with a fixed EOS; once these relations close the system, EOS variation is removed by construction. The Fisher-matrix error budget does not appear to include the known few-percent scatter in these relations across EOS families, which would introduce systematic bias into the distance inference and propagate to the other parameters.

    Authors: We agree that the reported EOS independence of the errors follows directly from imposing the universal relations (which close the parameter system) together with a fixed EOS in Framework 2; this is the intended design of the framework to enable distance inference without explicit EOS dependence. However, the Fisher-matrix analysis indeed treats the relations as exact and does not incorporate their known scatter, which would represent an additional systematic uncertainty. We will revise the abstract, §4, and the discussion section to explicitly note this limitation and its potential effect on the inferred errors. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 and Eq. (universal-relation statements): the distance inference in Framework 2 reduces in part to quantities defined by the same universal relations that were originally obtained by fitting families of equations of state. This introduces a circularity that is not quantified; any residual EOS dependence or scatter in the relations would undermine both the reported accuracy and the claimed EOS independence of the errors.

    Authors: The universal relations are adopted from the literature as empirical constraints assumed to hold across EOS families. While the distance inference does rely on these relations (originally fitted to EOS ensembles), the framework treats them as fixed inputs independent of the specific EOS chosen for the simulation. We acknowledge that residual dependence or scatter is not quantified in the current analysis and could affect the results. We will add a dedicated paragraph in §3.2 and the conclusions to discuss this potential circularity as a caveat, without performing new calculations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Framework 2's claimed EOS-independent distance errors reduce to exact imposition of fitted kappa(C) and I(C) universal relations

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "we utilize this and the relation between the moment of inertia and compactness, in addition to assuming an equation of state and utilizing pulsar frequency measurements, to directly measure the neutron star's distance... the simulated errors in this framework are found to be independent of the equation of state."

    The distance measurement and the EOS-independence of its errors are obtained by substituting the kappa-compactness and I-compactness relations (which are fitted to EOS families) to close the system; once imposed exactly, the error budget is independent of EOS by construction, with no accounting for known scatter in the relations.

full rationale

The paper's second framework substitutes the two universal relations plus an assumed EOS and pulsar frequency for the EM distance to close the inference system. The abstract states that the resulting simulated errors are independent of the equation of state. Because those relations are themselves obtained by fitting families of EOS models (as noted in the reader's take), the EOS-independence and the distance inference are forced once the relations are imposed exactly; the Fisher-matrix analysis does not propagate any scatter or model dependence from the relations themselves. This matches the fitted_input_called_prediction pattern at the level of the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on two universal relations taken from prior work and on the assumption of a specific equation of state; no new entities are introduced and the saturation-amplitude parameter is an inferred quantity rather than a free parameter chosen to force the result.

free parameters (1)
  • saturation amplitude parameter
    This is one of the three quantities inferred from the data rather than a parameter adjusted to make the derivation close.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption kappa satisfies a universal relation with compactness
    Invoked in the abstract to supply additional information beyond mountain signals; used to close the inference in the first framework.
  • domain assumption moment of inertia satisfies a universal relation with compactness
    Used together with the kappa relation and an assumed equation of state to enable distance inference in the second framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5791 in / 1477 out tokens · 30090 ms · 2026-05-24T00:02:58.689214+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Various factors like relativistic effects, rapid rotation and magnetic field affect the value of κ. It has been shown that the relativistic effect is the strongest factor [28] and that κ satisfies a universal relation with the compactness ( C = M R ) of the star, given by ([28, 35]): κ = 0.667 − 0.478C − 1.11C 2. (33) The compactness of the star also sati...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We consider an observation time of 0 .5 − 4 years, as gravitational wave detectors observing runs last at least a year

    Choice of input parameters Here we discuss the choice of the ranges/values of the 9 input parameters mentioned above. We consider an observation time of 0 .5 − 4 years, as gravitational wave detectors observing runs last at least a year. A fixed rin of 1 Kpc is assumed. This is expected to be within the range where all-sky searches are sensitive to neutro...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The output parameters hout, fout, ˙fout, and ¨fout are then calculated via Eq (40)

    Output Parameters Post choosing values for the input parameters, we convert α into estimates of αs by using Eq (24) and fiducial values for M = 1.4M⊙, R = (5Iin/2M)1/2 and ˜J = 0.01635 [11]. The output parameters hout, fout, ˙fout, and ¨fout are then calculated via Eq (40). The output braking index nout is then calculated using Eq (5). We ignore cases whe...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We consider a similar observation time to the previous case

    Choice of input parameters Now we discuss the choice of the ranges/values of the input parameters mentioned above. We consider a similar observation time to the previous case. A range of [10 −25 − 10−27] is explored for h0in, as this range includes signals that current and future detectors can po- tentially detect on narrow band searches [15, 44]. The ran...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Due to this, we again lose around 8% to 16% of data as nin increases from 3 to 7

    Output parameters Similar to section IV A, we ignore cases where αs ̸∈ [10−8, 10−1] and nout ̸∈ [3, 7]. Due to this, we again lose around 8% to 16% of data as nin increases from 3 to 7. We again use 15 the median relative error (Eq (42)) to compare the input and output parameters, but we don’t normalise the error with the 0.1% error assumed for the rotati...

    work page

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 26 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett. 892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MASTER, J...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Hybrid stars in the light of GW170817

    R. Nandi and P. Char, Astrophys. J. 857, 12 (2018), arXiv:1712.08094 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Constraining the relativistic mean-field model equations of state with gravitational wave observations

    R. Nandi, P. Char, and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 99, 052802 (2019), arXiv:1809.07108 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Biswas, P

    B. Biswas, P. Char, R. Nandi, and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. D103, 103015 (2021), arXiv:2008.01582 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    J. L. Friedman and B. F. Schutz, Astrophys. J. 222, 281 (1978)

    work page 1978

  15. [15]

    The r-mode instability in rotating neutron stars

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 381 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0010102

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  16. [16]

    B. J. Owen, L. Lindblom, C. Cutler, B. F. Schutz, A. Vecchio, and N. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D 58, 084020 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9804044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [17]

    Spin Evolution of Accreting Neutron Stars: Nonlinear Development of the R-mode Instability

    R. Bondarescu, S. A. Teukolsky, and I. Wasserman, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064019 (2007), arXiv:0704.0799 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    Spinning down newborn neutron stars: nonlinear development of the r-mode instability

    R. Bondarescu, S. A. Teukolsky, and I. Wasserman, Phys. Rev. D 79, 104003 (2009), arXiv:0809.3448 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    M. G. Alford and K. Schwenzer, Astrophys. J. 781, 26 (2014), arXiv:1210.6091 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Riles, Living Rev

    K. Riles, Living Rev. Rel. 26, 3 (2023), arXiv:2206.06447 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Steltner, M

    B. Steltner, M. Papa, H.-B. Eggenstein, R. Prix, M. Bensch, B. Allen, and B. Machenschalk, The Astrophysical Journal 952, 55 (2023). 27

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Astrophys. J. 875, 122 (2019), [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 918, 91 (2021)], arXiv:1812.11656 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Fesik and M

    L. Fesik and M. A. Papa, The Astrophysical Journal 895, 11 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Rajbhandari, B

    B. Rajbhandari, B. J. Owen, S. Caride, and R. Inta, Physical Review D 104, 122008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Sieniawska and D

    M. Sieniawska and D. I. Jones, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 509, 5179 (2021), arXiv:2108.11710 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    N. Lu, K. Wette, S. M. Scott, and A. Melatos, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521, 2103 (2023), arXiv:2209.10981 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Learning from the frequency content of continuous gravitational wave signals,

    D. I. Jones, “Learning from the frequency content of continuous gravitational wave signals,” in Astrophysics in the XXI Century with Compact Stars (World Scientific, 2022) Chap. 6, pp. 201–217, arXiv:2111.08561 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    D’Antonio, C

    S. D’Antonio, C. Palomba, P. Astone, S. Frasca, G. Intini, I. La Rosa, P. Leaci, S. Mastro- giovanni, A. Miller, F. Muciaccia, O. J. Piccinni, and A. Singhal, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103017 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    A. L. Miller, N. Aggarwal, S. Clesse, and F. De Lillo, Phys. Rev. D 105, 062008 (2022), arXiv:2110.06188 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Ghosh, Mon

    S. Ghosh, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 525, 448 (2023), arXiv:2304.12356 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Jaranowski, A

    P. Jaranowski, A. Kr´ olak, and B. F. Schutz, Phys. Rev. D 58, 063001 (1998)

    work page 1998

  32. [32]

    B. J. Owen, Phys. Rev. D 82, 104002 (2010), arXiv:1006.1994 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    R-mode frequencies of slowly rotating relativistic neutron stars with realistic equations of state

    A. Idrisy, B. J. Owen, and D. I. Jones, Phys. Rev. D 91, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1410.7360 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Jaranowski and A

    P. Jaranowski and A. Kr´ olak, Phys. Rev. D 59, 063003 (1999)

    work page 1999

  35. [35]

    Vallisneri, Phys

    M. Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Prix, Phys

    R. Prix, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023004 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 069901 (2007)], arXiv:gr- qc/0606088

    work page arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Dreissigacker, R

    C. Dreissigacker, R. Prix, and K. Wette, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084058 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Behnke, M

    B. Behnke, M. A. Papa, and R. Prix, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064007 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Prix, Technical Report T0900149-v6, The F-statistic and its implementation in ComputeF- Statistic v2, Tech

    R. Prix, Technical Report T0900149-v6, The F-statistic and its implementation in ComputeF- Statistic v2, Tech. Rep. (LIGO, 2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Ghosh, D

    S. Ghosh, D. Pathak, and D. Chatterjee, Astrophys. J. 944, 53 (2023), arXiv:2209.11941 [gr-qc]. 28

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Maximum mass, moment of inertia and compactness of relativistic stars

    C. Breu and L. Rezzolla, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 459, 646 (2016), arXiv:1601.06083 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    J. H. Taylor and J. M. Cordes, Astrophys. J. 411, 674 (1993)

    work page 1993

  43. [43]

    Prospects for accurate distance measurements of pulsars with the SKA: enabling fundamental physics

    R. Smits, S. J. Tingay, N. Wex, M. Kramer, and B. Stappers, Astron. Astrophys. 528, A108 (2011), arXiv:1101.5971 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Mølnvik and E

    T. Mølnvik and E. Østgaard, Nucl. Phys. A 437, 239 (1985)

    work page 1985

  45. [45]

    Z. Miao, A. Li, and Z.-G. Dai, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 515, 5071 (2022), arXiv:2107.07979 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    M. e. a. Kramer, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041050 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    and Abbott et

    Abbott, R. and Abbott et. al (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KA- GRA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 082004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Saturation of the R-mode Instability

    P. Arras, E. E. Flanagan, S. M. Morsink, A. K. Schenk, S. A. Teukolsky, and I. Wasserman, Astrophys. J. 591, 1129 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0202345

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  49. [49]

    Abbott and T

    R. Abbott and T. D. e. a. Abbott (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 022002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Wette, Astropart

    K. Wette, Astropart. Phys. 153, 102880 (2023), arXiv:2305.07106 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array

    G. Desvignes et al. (EPTA), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 458, 3341 (2016), arXiv:1602.08511 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    S. K. Dhiman, R. Kumar, and B. K. Agrawal, Phys. Rev. C 76, 045801 (2007)

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    Nandi and S

    R. Nandi and S. Pal, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230, 551 (2021), arXiv:2008.10943 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Construction of Highly Accurate Models of Rotating Neutron Stars - Comparison of Three Different Numerical Schemes

    T. Nozawa, N. Stergioulas, E. Gourgoulhon, and Y. Eriguchi, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 132, 431 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9804048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  55. [55]

    M. E. Lower et al. , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508, 3251 (2021), arXiv:2109.07612 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    T. E. Riley et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    A. P. Igoshev and S. B. Popov, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499, 2826 (2020), arXiv:2008.11737 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    The effect of magnetic fields on the r-modes of slowly rotating relativistic neutron stars

    C. Chirenti and J. Sk´ akala, Phys. Rev. D 88, 104018 (2013), arXiv:1308.3685 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    J. L. Friedman, L. Lindblom, L. Rezzolla, and A. I. Chugunov, Physical Review D 96, 124008 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    Gittins and N

    F. Gittins and N. Andersson, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521, 3043 (2023), arXiv:2212.04892 29 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    I-Love-Q

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Science 341, 365 (2013), arXiv:1302.4499 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    On the universality of I-Love-Q relations in magnetized neutron stars

    B. Haskell, R. Ciolfi, F. Pannarale, and L. Rezzolla, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 438, L71 (2014), arXiv:1309.3885 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    K. D. Kokkotas and K. Schwenzer, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 38 (2016), arXiv:1510.07051 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    A. G. Pili, N. Bucciantini, and L. Del Zanna, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 447, 2821 (2015), arXiv:1412.4036 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015