Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Jump Starting Bandits with LLM-Generated Prior Knowledge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.19317 v2 pith:P724LIC6 submitted 2024-06-27 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

Jump Starting Bandits with LLM-Generated Prior Knowledge

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords banditscontextualllmsbandithumanexperimentknowledgelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present substantial evidence demonstrating the benefits of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with a Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit framework. Contextual bandits have been widely used in recommendation systems to generate personalized suggestions based on user-specific contexts. We show that LLMs, pre-trained on extensive corpora rich in human knowledge and preferences, can simulate human behaviours well enough to jump-start contextual multi-armed bandits to reduce online learning regret. We propose an initialization algorithm for contextual bandits by prompting LLMs to produce a pre-training dataset of approximate human preferences for the bandit. This significantly reduces online learning regret and data-gathering costs for training such models. Our approach is validated empirically through two sets of experiments with different bandit setups: one which utilizes LLMs to serve as an oracle and a real-world experiment utilizing data from a conjoint survey experiment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Bandits

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lightweight numerical bandits on text embeddings match or exceed LLM accuracy in contextual bandits at a fraction of the cost, with an embedding-based diagnostic to choose between them.

  2. LILO: Bayesian Optimization with Natural Language Feedback

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LILO integrates LLMs to translate natural language feedback into preference signals for Gaussian process-based Bayesian optimization, outperforming standard preference BO and LLM-only methods on benchmarks.