Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Price Collusion in Two-sided Markets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.04088 v1 pith:A5GBQMFA submitted 2024-07-04 econ.GN cs.AIcs.GTq-fin.EC

classification econ.GNcs.AIcs.GTq-fin.EC
keywords collusionhigheralgorithmicalgorithmsartificialdiscountintelligencemarkets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Algorithmic price collusion facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms raises significant concerns. We examine how AI agents using Q-learning engage in tacit collusion in two-sided markets. Our experiments reveal that AI-driven platforms achieve higher collusion levels compared to Bertrand competition. Increased network externalities significantly enhance collusion, suggesting AI algorithms exploit them to maximize profits. Higher user heterogeneity or greater utility from outside options generally reduce collusion, while higher discount rates increase it. Tacit collusion remains feasible even at low discount rates. To mitigate collusive behavior and inform potential regulatory measures, we propose incorporating a penalty term in the Q-learning algorithm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools