REVIEW 3 cited by
The Maximum Black Hole Mass at Solar Metallicity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We analyse the current knowledge and uncertainties in detailed stellar evolution and wind modelling to evaluate the mass of the most massive stellar black hole (BH) at solar metallicity. Contrary to common expectations that it is the most massive stars that produce the most massive BHs, we find that the maximum $M_{\rm BH}^{\rm Max} \simeq 30 \pm 10\,M_{\odot}$ is found in the canonical intermediate range between $M_{\rm ZAMS} \simeq 30$ and $50\,M_{\odot}$ instead. The prime reason for this seemingly counter-intuitive finding is that very massive stars (VMS) have increasingly high mass-loss rates, leading to substantial mass evaporation before they expire as stars, ending as lighter BHs than their canonical O-star counterparts.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Trading oxygen for iron II. Oxygen- versus iron-dependent cosmic star formation history
Most cosmic star formation occurred in gas with non-solar O/Fe; the cosmic mean [Fe/H] lags [O/H] by up to ~0.5 dex.
-
The Stellar Winds Atlas II: Black Hole Formation at Solar Metallicity
Black hole masses at solar metallicity are set by whether a star becomes a Wolf-Rayet star before collapse, and cool supergiant winds control that split.
-
Binary Black Hole Phase Space Discovers the Signature of Pair Instability Supernovae Mass Gap
Applying a phase-space overlap method to GWTC-4, the paper claims first-generation black holes are truncated near 45.5 solar masses, but the cutoff follows from the assumed exponential mass prior rather than from the data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.