REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards Complete Causal Explanation with Expert Knowledge
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study the problem of restricting a Markov equivalence class of maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs) to only those MAGs that contain certain edge marks, which we refer to as expert or orientation knowledge. Such a restriction of the Markov equivalence class can be uniquely represented by a restricted essential ancestral graph. Our contributions are several-fold. First, we prove certain properties for the entire Markov equivalence class including a conjecture from Ali et al. (2009). Second, we present several new sound graphical orientation rules for adding orientation knowledge to an essential ancestral graph. We also show that some orientation rules of Zhang (2008b) are not needed for restricting the Markov equivalence class with orientation knowledge. Third, we provide an algorithm for including this orientation knowledge and show that in certain settings the output of our algorithm is a restricted essential ancestral graph. Finally, outside of the specified settings, we provide an algorithm for checking whether a graph is a restricted essential graph and discuss its runtime. This work can be seen as a generalization of Meek (1995) to settings which allow for latent confounding.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Identifying Conditional Causal Effects in MPDAGs
The paper gives sound and complete methods for identifying conditional causal effects when the causal graph is known only up to an MPDAG.
-
Integrating Background Knowledge for Scalable Causal Discovery
Integrating adjacency, orientation, and gap background knowledge during PC, SNAP, MB-by-MB, LDECC, and LOAD reduces CI tests and improves causal-effect estimates under standard assumptions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.