REVIEW 6 cited by
On the uncertainty of the White Dwarf Astrophysical Gravitational Wave Background
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Context: The astrophysical gravitational wave background (AGWB) is a stochastic gravitational wave (GW) signal that is emitted by different populations of inspiralling binary systems containing compact objects throughout the Universe. In the frequency range between 0.1 and 100 mHz it will be detected by future space-based gravitational wave detectors like the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). Recently, we concluded that the white dwarf (WD) contribution to the AGWB dominates over that of black holes (BHs) and neutron stars (NSs). Aims: We aim to investigate the uncertainties of the WD AGWB that arise from the use of different stellar metallicities, different star formation rate density (SFRD) models, and different binary evolution models. Methods: We use the code developed before to determine the WD component of the AGWB. We use a metallicity dependent SFRD based on earlier work to construct five different SFRD models. We use four different population models that use different common-envelope treatment and six different metallicities for each model. Results: For all possible combinations, the WD component of the AGWB is dominant over other populations of compact objects. The effects of metallicity and population model are smaller than the effect of a (metallicity dependent) SFRD model. We find a range of about a factor of 5 in the level of the WD AGWB around a mid value of $\Omega_{\rm WD} = 4\times10^{-12}$ at 1 mHz and a shape that depends weakly on the model. Conclusions: We find an uncertainty for the WD component of the AGWB of about a factor 5. We note that there exist other uncertainties that have an effect on this signal as well. We discuss whether the turnover of the WD AGWB at 10 mHz will be detectable by LISA, and find that this is likely. We confirm the previous finding that the WD component of the AGWB dominates over other populations, in particular BHs.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Flexible Spectral Separation of Multiple Isotropic and Anisotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds in LISA
BLIP 2.0 simultaneously infers multiple isotropic and anisotropic stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds in simulated LISA data, recovering the Milky Way, LMC, and stellar-origin black hole components and bounding ...
-
Detecting gravitational signatures of dark matter with atom gradiometers
Atom gradiometers, especially a space-based AEDGE+-like design, could probe a 10% dark matter clump subcomponent in the 10^6 to 10^10 kg window and order-10 ultralight dark matter overdensities through purely gravitat...
-
Inferring the stochastic gravitational-wave background from eccentric stellar-mass binary black holes with spaceborne detectors
Eccentric black-hole-binary backgrounds from globular clusters and isolated evolution would look like power-law noise for TianQin/LISA/Taiji, but AGN-formed binaries produce a turnover that LISA and Taiji can distinguish.
-
Assessing the performance of future space-based detectors: Astrophysical foregrounds and individual sources
A unified foreground simulation shows the μAres concept is heavily blurred by massive-black-hole-binary noise while the Decihertz Observatory is the cleanest post-LISA design.
-
Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: II. Reconstruction of conventional signals over astrophysical foregrounds
When realistic astrophysical foregrounds are included, LISA can reconstruct the cosmic-string tension to 10% precision only for Gμ ≳ 10^{-11}, 10^5 times larger than foreground-free forecasts.
-
Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison
As provided, the manuscript body (random lasing) does not correspond to the abstract (cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA), leaving the abstract's quantitative claims unsupported by any accessible text.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.