Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 5 cited by

LISA can reconstruct the cosmic-string tension to within a few percent over a wide parameter range, and can confidently distinguish the two standard cosmic-string network models once the tension exceeds 5×10^-13.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

As provided, the manuscript body (random lasing) does not correspond to the abstract (cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA), leaving the abstract's quantitative claims unsupported by any accessible text.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Promising abstract for a cosmic-string GWB template survey, but the supplied full text is an unrelated random-laser intro, so none of the quantitative claims can be verified. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2508.05395 v2 pith:VASAQD3Z submitted 2025-08-07 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison

Androniki Dimitriou , Daniel G. Figueroa , Peera Simakachorn , Bryan Zaldivar This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph PACS 04.30.-w11.27.+d
keywords cosmic stringsgravitational wave backgroundLISAstochastic backgroundsimulation-based inferencetemplate reconstructionmodel comparisonstring tension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a signal survey and parameter-reconstruction forecast for the stochastic gravitational-wave background produced by cosmic-string networks, targeting the LISA detector. The authors build a large catalog of spectral templates for both standard cosmic strings (with VOS and BOS loop-production models) and a range of beyond-standard scenarios (exotic string types, modified expansion histories, altered loop properties). Using simulation-based inference, they show that LISA can reconstruct the string tension Gμ with an error of at most 10% for Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-15}$, improving to 2-3% for Gμ ≳ $10^{-12}$, and can distinguish the BOS and VOS models confidently for Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-13}$. The paper matters because a precise measurement of the tension would probe physics at energy scales far beyond the reach of particle colliders, and model discrimination would reveal how string loops are produced.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: LISA, observing in isolation a stochastic background from cosmic strings, can measure the string tension Gμ with percent-level precision across a wide range of signal amplitudes. In particular, the reconstruction error is ≲10% for Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-15}$, dropping to 2-3% for Gμ ≳ $10^{-12}$, for both conventional Nambu-Goto network descriptions (VOS and BOS). Furthermore, the two competing descriptions of loop formation become distinguishable with confidence once Gμ ≳ 5×$10^{-13}$. For beyond-conventional scenarios, the paper provides SNR and error thresholds for each parameter and, for selected cases, identifies the regions where such exotic signals can be told apart from conventio

What carries the argument

The central object is the template catalog of gravitational-wave background spectra Ω_GW(f) for cosmic strings, classified as conventional (standard expansion history plus VOS or BOS loop production) or beyond-conventional (modified loop number density, exotic string types, non-standard cosmologies, altered loop properties). The load-bearing mechanism is the paper's simulation-based inference package, GWBackFinder: it simulates synthetic LISA data across the parameter space of each template and learns the posterior distribution of the signal parameters. This turns each spectral template into a quantitative prediction about measurement uncertainty and model distinguishability.

Load-bearing premise

Every quoted reconstruction error and model-discrimination threshold assumes that LISA observes the cosmic-string background in isolation, with no overlapping astrophysical foreground; if unresolved foregrounds (such as white-dwarf binaries) contribute to the same frequency band, the achievable precision will be worse than the paper reports.

What would settle it

Generate synthetic LISA observations that include a cosmic-string signal with Gμ ≈ $10^{-14}$ superimposed on the expected galactic white-dwarf binary foreground, run the same simulation-based reconstruction, and check whether the tension error remains ≤10% and whether the BOS-vs-VOS discrimination still holds at Gμ ≈ 5×$10^{-13}$; if either fails, the optimistic foreground-free claims are not valid in the real noise environment.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If a cosmic-string background is detected by LISA and no astrophysical foreground contaminates it, the string tension Gμ can be measured to a few percent, turning a detection into a precision early-universe measurement.
  • A confident BOS-vs-VOS discrimination at Gμ > 5×10^-13 would select between two different descriptions of the loop-formation process in Nambu-Goto networks, with direct consequences for the small-scale structure of string loops and their gravitational-wave emission.
  • For beyond-conventional models (metastable, superconducting or super-heavy strings, non-standard expansion histories), the reported error and SNR thresholds define which regions of parameter space LISA can actually constrain or exclude.
  • The template catalog and the error-floor curves establish a baseline for the LISA search, against which any future foreground-inclusive analysis can be compared to see how much precision is lost by the universe's other stochastic sources.
  • If no cosmic-string background is seen, the reconstruction-error curves translate, at given detection thresholds, into upper limits on Gμ that depend on the assumed network model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Note on the input: the full-text section supplied with this abstract covers an unrelated article on random lasers; this extraction is consequently anchored to the abstract alone, and the paper's internal derivations were not checked independently.
  • Because the quoted precision assumes a foreground-free observation, the real LISA measurement will likely sit under unresolved white-dwarf binary and compact-binary backgrounds; a direct forecast of the degraded precision would be a natural follow-up, and the present numbers should be read as best-case floors.
  • The model-discrimination threshold Gμ ≈ 5×10^-13 may correspond to the scale at which the two standard loop-production descriptions produce differing high-frequency spectral features; below this tension their spectra are effectively degenerate in the LISA band, meaning a detection alone will not identify the loop-formation mechanism.
  • The catalog's classification of beyond-conventional scenarios can be reused as a test suite for other gravitational-wave detectors (e.g., future space interferometers or pulsar timing arrays) whose frequency bands overlap with the cosmic-string background.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to present a catalog of cosmic-string gravitational wave background templates, an SBI-based reconstruction of their parameters with LISA using the GWBackFinder package, and model-comparison thresholds. The abstract reports quantitative results: tension errors ≲10% for Gμ ≳ 5×10⁻¹⁵, decreasing to 2–3% for Gμ ≳ 10⁻¹², and confident BOS/VOS distinguishability for Gμ ≳ 5×10⁻¹³. However, the supplied full text is an unrelated introduction to random lasers (RGB lasing, electrospinning), containing no cosmological or gravitational-wave content. No equations, noise model, injection procedure, template definitions, or analysis results appear anywhere in the body. The abstract's claims are therefore entirely unsupported by the manuscript text.

Significance. If the claimed quantitative results were established, they would be of considerable importance: they would quantify LISA's reach for measuring cosmic-string tension and for distinguishing competing network models, with direct relevance to fundamental physics and cosmology. The concrete threshold numbers in the abstract are falsifiable predictions that a complete paper could test. However, in its current form the manuscript provides no evidence whatsoever for these claims. The presented body text is unrelated to the abstract, so the significance of the work cannot be assessed: there is no method to evaluate, no code to check, and no data to scrutinize.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (Introduction) vs. Abstract] The central claims of the paper—reconstruction precision of cosmic-string tension, BOS/VOS distinguishability, SNR thresholds—are stated only in the abstract. The supplied body begins with 'Random lasers (RLs) have gained attention...' and contains no mention of cosmic strings, LISA, GWBackFinder, gravitational wave backgrounds, noise modeling, simulation, or parameter inference. There is no derivation, no equations, no tables, and no results that could substantiate the numbers (e.g., '≲10% for Gμ ≳ 5·10^-15'). This is not a presentation issue; it is the absence of the entire technical content needed to evaluate the central claims. The manuscript as submitted is internally inconsistent and cannot be verified.
  2. [Abstract (methodological support)] Even setting aside the body mismatch, the abstract makes no reference to a specific noise model for LISA, a signal injection procedure, or a statistical criterion for 'confident' distinguishability. The claim that BOS and VOS are 'distinguishable confidently' requires a defined decision rule (e.g., Bayes factor or posterior overlap threshold). None is given. Without these definitions, the quoted thresholds are not reproducible. A complete paper must describe the template catalog, the SBI algorithm, the likelihood and noise model, and the model-comparison procedure.
  3. [Abstract (foreground limitation)] The abstract's final sentence defers 'quality reconstruction studies of cosmic-string GWBs, superimposed over leading astrophysical foregrounds' to future papers. This is an honest limitation, but it is load-bearing for the quoted error bars: the 10%/2–3% tension errors and the BOS/VOS threshold are obtained in a foreground-free setting. If unresolved astrophysical backgrounds overlap the cosmic-string signal in the LISA band, those numbers could change materially. A reader cannot currently evaluate whether the quoted precision would survive a realistic foreground environment.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title/Keywords] The keywords ('RGB, white lasing, random lasing, electrospinning') and the title/abstract describe entirely different subjects. If this is a submission error, the authors should resubmit the correct manuscript; if not, the mismatch itself is a fatal presentation flaw.
  2. [References] The body references non-existent entries (e.g., '1–3', '4–8') for random-laser literature, with no bibliography. None of the cosmic-string or LISA literature cited in the abstract is present in the body.
  3. [Notation] The abstract introduces 'BOS' and 'VOS' without definition, and the body provides no glossary. These abbreviations are presumably loop distribution models, but the reader cannot confirm from the supplied text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular step identifiable; supplied full text does not contain the claimed derivation.

full rationale

The abstract claims a catalog of cosmic-string GWB templates and reconstruction precision using the SBI package GWBackFinder, with quantitative statements about Gμ reconstruction errors and BOS/VOS distinguishability. However, the supplied full text is an unrelated introduction to random lasers (it begins 'Random lasers (RLs) have gained attention...'). There are no equations, no template definitions, no simulation or inference details, and no model-comparison results. Treating all manuscript text as in-scope evidence, there is no derivation chain to walk. Circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction—e.g., an equation equal by construction, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. No such reduction can be quoted because none appears in the supplied text. The abstract/body mismatch is a serious verifiability and correctness issue, but it is not a circularity pattern enumerated in the rubric. Therefore the honest circularity score is 0, with no steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract offers a template survey and forecast, so the load-bearing inputs are the assumed physical picture (cosmic-string networks emitting a GWB), the assumed LISA sensitivity, and the foreground-free setting. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced; the beyond-conventional string families are borrowed from prior literature per the abstract's own description. Parameters such as Gμ are scanned rather than fitted, and the beyond-conventional modifiers are not enumerated in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • Cosmic-string tension Gμ
    Scanned over the range used for the quoted thresholds (roughly 10^-15 to above 10^-12). It is a physical model parameter of the templates, not a constant fitted to data, but the forecasts are presented as functions of it.
  • Beyond-conventional model parameters (loop number density, expansion history, loop properties)
    The abstract says reconstruction precision is quantified by 'scanning over their parameter space' for LRS, super, metastable, current-carrying strings and modified cosmologies; the individual parameters are not listed in the abstract.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Cosmic-string networks exist and emit stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds described by the adopted template families.
    The entire catalog and forecast presuppose the standard cosmic-string GWB emission picture; the abstract classifies templates 'based on relevant models proposed in the literature' without re-deriving or validating the network dynamics.
  • domain assumption LISA will operate at the nominal sensitivity implied by the 'LISA window.'
    All reconstruction-error and distinguishability thresholds are computed against the mission's assumed sensitivity; deviations in noise performance change the quoted numbers.
  • domain assumption Signals are treated in isolation from astrophysical foregrounds in this first paper.
    The final abstract sentence defers foreground-superposed studies to upcoming papers, so the quoted errors describe an idealized observation; this is load-bearing for the strongest claim.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VASAQD3Z

@misc{pith2026250805395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VASAQD3Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05395}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We present a catalog of gravitational wave background (GWB) signal templates from cosmic-string networks, based on relevant models proposed in the literature. We classify templates as conventional, based on standard cosmology and Nambu-Goto results (VOS and BOS), and beyond conventional, based on modifications of a) the loop number density (LRS, super, metastable, current-carrying strings), b) the expansion history (non-standard cosmologies, extra degrees of freedom, either thermal or secluded), or c) the loop properties (birth length, power emission). Using the SBI package $\texttt{GWBackFinder}$, we quantify the reconstruction precision of each signal by LISA, scanning over their parameter space, and performing model comparisons. For conventional signals, LISA reconstructs the tension $G\mu$ with an error $\lesssim 10\%$ for $G\mu \gtrsim 5\cdot 10^{-15}$, which decreases down to $2-3\%$ for $G\mu \gtrsim 10^{-12}$. BOS and VOS modelings become distinguishable confidently for $G\mu \gtrsim 5\cdot 10^{-13}$. For beyond-conventional signals, we identify SNR and error-threshold intervals for each parameter, and determine (for few examples) the regions where they can be distinguished from conventional signals. Analogous quality reconstruction studies of cosmic-string GWBs, superimposed over leading astrophysical foregrounds in the LISA window, will be presented in a series of upcoming papers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. New gravitational-wave templates for metastable cosmic strings: Loop breaking versus network collapse

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Metastable cosmic strings produce a gravitational wave background that is best modeled with three parameters (string tension Gμ plus independent time scales t_LB and t_NC), yielding a compact analytical spectrum when ...

  2. LISA Reconstruction Landscape for Metastable Cosmic Strings

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    LISA can reconstruct metastable cosmic-string tension and lifetime when it samples the tail-to-plateau transition, with residual κ_CS sensitivity possible even in high-SNR plateau-like spectra.

  3. Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: II. Reconstruction of conventional signals over astrophysical foregrounds

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    When realistic astrophysical foregrounds are included, LISA can reconstruct the cosmic-string tension to 10% precision only for Gμ ≳ 10^{-11}, 10^5 times larger than foreground-free forecasts.

  4. Fire at the Tip of the Throat: Hagedorn Phase after brane-antibrane inflation?

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In perturbatively moduli-stabilized brane-antibrane inflation, a modest fraction of annihilation energy into visible open strings can trigger a Hagedorn phase that suppresses ΔN_eff when the SM throat string scale is ...

  5. On the Reliability of Sampling Strategies in Offline Recommender Evaluation

    cs.IR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulated exposure conditions on fully observed preference data show that the reliability of offline recommender evaluation depends jointly on the logging exposure model and the sampling strategy, and the paper maps w...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

278 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 241103 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04855 1606.04855 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO collaboration, GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 221101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01812 1706.01812 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c Astrophys. J. Lett. 851 (2017) L35 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05578 1711.05578 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  4. [4]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL collaboration, Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 (2017) L13 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05834 1710.05834 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  5. [5]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.141101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 141101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.09660 1709.09660 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05832 1710.05832 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031040 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12907 1811.12907 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO collaboration, GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 022001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01045 2108.01045 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific collaboration, GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 041039 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03606 2111.03606 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L8 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16213 2306.16213 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  11. [11]

    Search for gravitational wave signals , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 Astron

    EPTA, InPTA: collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16214 2306.16214 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L6 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16215 2306.16215 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  13. [13]

    Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 Res

    H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023) 075024 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16216 2306.16216 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013 Class

    S. Hild et al., Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013 Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0908 1012.0908 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  15. [15]

    Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 Class

    M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 2010

  16. [16]

    Abac et al., The Science of the Einstein Telescope , https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12263 2503.12263

    A. Abac et al., The Science of the Einstein Telescope , https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12263 2503.12263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    LIGO Scientific collaboration, Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors , https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa51f4 Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 044001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08697 1607.08697 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO , Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019) 035 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04833 1907.04833 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna , https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00786 1702.00786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    LISA Cosmology Working Group collaboration, Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna , https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-023-00045-2 Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) 5 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05434 2204.05434 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    L. P. Grishchuk, Amplification of gravitational waves in an istropic universe , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67 (1974) 825

    1974

  22. [22]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe , JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682

    1979

  23. [23]

    V. A. Rubakov, M. V. Sazhin and A. V. Veryaskin, Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90641-4 Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 189

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90641-4 1982

  24. [24]

    Fabbri and M

    R. Fabbri and M. d. Pollock, The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation , https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9 Phys. Lett. B 125 (1983) 445

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9 1983

  25. [25]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, N-flationary magnetic fields , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/10/018 JCAP 10 (2006) 018 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0606534 astro-ph/0606534 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    L. Sorbo, Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2011/06/003 JCAP 06 (2011) 003 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1525 1101.1525 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [27]

    Pajer and M

    E. Pajer and M. Peloso, A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214002 Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214002 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3557 1305.3557 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Adshead, E

    P. Adshead, E. Martinec and M. Wyman, Gauge fields and inflation: Chiral gravitational waves, fluctuations, and the Lyth bound , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.021302 Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 021302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.2598 1301.2598 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Adshead, E

    P. Adshead, E. Martinec and M. Wyman, Perturbations in Chromo-Natural Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2013)087 JHEP 09 (2013) 087 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2930 1305.2930 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    A. Maleknejad, Axion Inflation with an SU(2) Gauge Field: Detectable Chiral Gravity Waves , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2016)104 JHEP 07 (2016) 104 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03327 1604.03327 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello and T. Fujita, Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/019 JCAP 01 (2017) 019 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04216 1608.04216 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Namba, M

    R. Namba, M. Peloso, M. Shiraishi, L. Sorbo and C. Unal, Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/041 JCAP 01 (2016) 041 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07521 1509.07521 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    R. Z. Ferreira, J. Ganc, J. Nore\ na and M. S. Sloth, On the validity of the perturbative description of axions during inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/039 JCAP 04 (2016) 039 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06116 1512.06116 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Peloso, L

    M. Peloso, L. Sorbo and C. Unal, Rolling axions during inflation: perturbativity and signatures , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/001 JCAP 09 (2016) 001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00459 1606.00459 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Domcke, M

    V. Domcke, M. Pieroni and P. Bin\'etruy, Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/031 JCAP 06 (2016) 031 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01287 1603.01287 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder, Axion Gauge Field Inflation and Gravitational Leptogenesis: A Lower Bound on B Modes from the Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.023532 Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023532 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03765 1706.03765 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori and S. Matarrese, Gravitational waves from inflation , https://doi.org/10.1393/ncr/i2016-10127-1 Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39 (2016) 399 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01615 1605.01615 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Bartolo et al., Science with the space-based interferometer LISA

    N. Bartolo et al., Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/026 JCAP 12 (2016) 026 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06481 1610.06481 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    D'Amico, N

    G. D'Amico, N. Kaloper and A. Westphal, General double monodromy inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103527 Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 103527 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13861 2112.13861 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    D'Amico, N

    G. D'Amico, N. Kaloper and A. Westphal, Double Monodromy Inflation: A Gravity Waves Factory for CMB-S4, LiteBIRD and LISA , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L081302 Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) L081302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05861 2101.05861 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Fumagalli, S

    J. Fumagalli, S. Renaux-Petel and L. T. Witkowski, Oscillations in the stochastic gravitational wave background from sharp features and particle production during inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/030 JCAP 08 (2021) 030 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02761 2012.02761 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Fumagalli, G

    J. Fumagalli, G. A. Palma, S. Renaux-Petel, S. Sypsas, L. T. Witkowski and C. Zenteno, Primordial gravitational waves from excited states , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)196 JHEP 03 (2022) 196 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14664 2111.14664 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Easther and E

    R. Easther and E. A. Lim, Stochastic gravitational wave production after inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2006/04/010 JCAP 04 (2006) 010 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601617 astro-ph/0601617 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    Garcia-Bellido and D

    J. Garcia-Bellido and D. G. Figueroa, A stochastic background of gravitational waves from hybrid preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.061302 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 061302 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701014 astro-ph/0701014 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  45. [45]

    Garcia-Bellido, D

    J. Garcia-Bellido, D. G. Figueroa and A. Sastre, A Gravitational Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043517 Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 043517 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0839 0707.0839 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    J. F. Dufaux, A. Bergman, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman and J.-P. Uzan, Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.123517 Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 123517 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0875 0707.0875 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    Dufaux, G

    J.-F. Dufaux, G. Felder, L. Kofman and O. Navros, Gravity Waves from Tachyonic Preheating after Hybrid Inflation , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/03/001 JCAP 03 (2009) 001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2917 0812.2917 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    Dufaux, D

    J.-F. Dufaux, D. G. Figueroa and J. Garcia-Bellido, Gravitational Waves from Abelian Gauge Fields and Cosmic Strings at Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083518 Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083518 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0217 1006.0217 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [49]

    Bethke, D

    L. Bethke, D. G. Figueroa and A. Rajantie, Anisotropies in the Gravitational Wave Background from Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.011301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 011301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.2657 1304.2657 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Bethke, D

    L. Bethke, D. G. Figueroa and A. Rajantie, On the Anisotropy of the Gravitational Wave Background from Massless Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/047 JCAP 06 (2014) 047 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1148 1309.1148 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    D. G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti, Gravitational wave production from preheating: parameter dependence , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/057 JCAP 10 (2017) 057 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04533 1707.04533 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin and Z. J. Weiner, Gravitational waves from gauge preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043525 Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 043525 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04550 1805.04550 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni and Z. J. Weiner, Constraining axion inflation with gravitational waves from preheating , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083534 Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083534 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12842 1909.12842 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni and Z. J. Weiner, Constraining Axion Inflation with Gravitational Waves across 29 Decades in Frequency , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.171301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 171301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12843 1909.12843 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Giovannini, Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083504 Phys

    M. Giovannini, Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083504 Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 083504 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9806329 hep-ph/9806329 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  56. [56]

    Giovannini, Production and detection of relic gravitons in quintessential inflationary models , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123511 Phys

    M. Giovannini, Production and detection of relic gravitons in quintessential inflationary models , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123511 Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 123511 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9903004 astro-ph/9903004 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    L. A. Boyle and A. Buonanno, Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043531 Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 043531 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2279 0708.2279 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [58]

    B. Li, P. R. Shapiro and T. Rindler-Daller, Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter and the gravitational wave background from inflation: new cosmological constraints and its detectability by LIGO , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.063505 Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 063505 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07961 1611.07961 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Li and P

    B. Li and P. R. Shapiro, Precision cosmology and the stiff-amplified gravitational-wave background from inflation: NANOGrav, Advanced LIGO-Virgo and the Hubble tension , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/024 JCAP 10 (2021) 024 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.12229 2107.12229 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, Inconsistency of an inflationary sector coupled only to Einstein gravity , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/050 JCAP 10 (2019) 050 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04093 1811.04093 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, Ability of LIGO and LISA to probe the equation of state of the early Universe , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/011 JCAP 08 (2019) 011 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11960 1905.11960 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion , https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10328 2108.10328

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    R. T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya et al., Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)116 JHEP 09 (2022) 116 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09299 2108.09299 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn, Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures , https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.01150 2111.01150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    V. K. Oikonomou, Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 observation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043516 Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043516 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17351 2306.17351 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Ghiglieri and M

    J. Ghiglieri and M. Laine, Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: Qualitative features , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/022 JCAP 07 (2015) 022 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02569 1504.02569 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    Ghiglieri, G

    J. Ghiglieri, G. Jackson, M. Laine and Y. Zhu, Gravitational wave background from Standard Model physics: Complete leading order , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2020)092 JHEP 07 (2020) 092 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11392 2004.11392 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Ringwald, J

    A. Ringwald, J. Sch\"utte-Engel and C. Tamarit, Gravitational Waves as a Big Bang Thermometer , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/054 JCAP 03 (2021) 054 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04731 2011.04731 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Ghiglieri, J

    J. Ghiglieri, J. Sch\"utte-Engel and E. Speranza, Freezing-in gravitational waves , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023538 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023538 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16513 2211.16513 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    S.-Y. Zhou, E. J. Copeland, R. Easther, H. Finkel, Z.-G. Mou and P. M. Saffin, Gravitational Waves from Oscillon Preheating , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)026 JHEP 10 (2013) 026 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6094 1304.6094 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Antusch, F

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala and S. Orani, Gravitational waves from oscillons after inflation , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.011303 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 011303 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01314 1607.01314 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Antusch, F

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala and S. Orani, What can we learn from the stochastic gravitational wave background produced by oscillons? , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/032 JCAP 03 (2018) 032 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03231 1712.03231 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Liu, Z.-K

    J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and G. Shiu, Gravitational Waves from Oscillons with Cuspy Potentials , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.031301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 031301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09841 1707.09841 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    M. A. Amin, J. Braden, E. J. Copeland, J. T. Giblin, C. Solorio, Z. J. Weiner et al., Gravitational waves from asymmetric oscillon dynamics? , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024040 Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 024040 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08047 1803.08047 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2837 Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2837 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9310044 astro-ph/9310044 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  76. [76]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant, Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.124015 Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 124015 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2593 0711.2593 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin, Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/09/022 JCAP 09 (2008) 022 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1828 0806.1828 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.041301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041301 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.2433 1304.2433 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [79]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir, Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123009 Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 123009 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03291 1504.03291 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/001 JCAP 04 (2016) 001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06239 1512.06239 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.