Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MOMAland: A Set of Benchmarks for Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.16312 v2 pith:B65QQBDK submitted 2024-07-23 cs.MA cs.AIcs.GT

classification cs.MAcs.AIcs.GT
keywords learningreinforcementmomalandmulti-agentmulti-objectivebenchmarksmomarlmultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many challenging tasks such as managing traffic systems, electricity grids, or supply chains involve complex decision-making processes that must balance multiple conflicting objectives and coordinate the actions of various independent decision-makers (DMs). One perspective for formalising and addressing such tasks is multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning (MOMARL). MOMARL broadens reinforcement learning (RL) to problems with multiple agents each needing to consider multiple objectives in their learning process. In reinforcement learning research, benchmarks are crucial in facilitating progress, evaluation, and reproducibility. The significance of benchmarks is underscored by the existence of numerous benchmark frameworks developed for various RL paradigms, including single-agent RL (e.g., Gymnasium), multi-agent RL (e.g., PettingZoo), and single-agent multi-objective RL (e.g., MO-Gymnasium). To support the advancement of the MOMARL field, we introduce MOMAland, the first collection of standardised environments for multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning. MOMAland addresses the need for comprehensive benchmarking in this emerging field, offering over 10 diverse environments that vary in the number of agents, state representations, reward structures, and utility considerations. To provide strong baselines for future research, MOMAland also includes algorithms capable of learning policies in such settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EngiBench: A Framework for Data-Driven Engineering Design Research

    cs.CE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EngiBench provides a unified, open-source benchmark suite with datasets and baseline algorithms (EngiOpt) for data-driven engineering design across aerodynamics, topology optimization, photonics, and power electronics.

Pith tools