REVIEW 1 cited by
How to Choose a Reinforcement-Learning Algorithm
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The field of reinforcement learning offers a large variety of concepts and methods to tackle sequential decision-making problems. This variety has become so large that choosing an algorithm for a task at hand can be challenging. In this work, we streamline the process of choosing reinforcement-learning algorithms and action-distribution families. We provide a structured overview of existing methods and their properties, as well as guidelines for when to choose which methods. An interactive version of these guidelines is available online at https://rl-picker.github.io/.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Statistical Multicriteria Evaluation of LLM-Generated Text
Using generalized stochastic dominance, the authors find that human-written text completions are not significantly outperformed by five LLM decoding strategies across mixed cardinal and ordinal quality metrics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.