Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Segment anything model 2: an application to 2D and 3D medical images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.00756 v3 pith:JBJKSWQH submitted 2024-08-01 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords medicalimagessegmentsegmentationabilityimagingmodalitiesanything
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Segment Anything Model (SAM) has gained significant attention because of its ability to segment various objects in images given a prompt. The recently developed SAM 2 has extended this ability to video inputs. This opens an opportunity to apply SAM to 3D images, one of the fundamental tasks in the medical imaging field. In this paper, we extensively evaluate SAM 2's ability to segment both 2D and 3D medical images by first collecting 21 medical imaging datasets, including surgical videos, common 3D modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) as well as 2D modalities such as X-ray and ultrasound. Two evaluation settings of SAM 2 are considered: (1) multi-frame 3D segmentation, where prompts are provided to one or multiple slice(s) selected from the volume, and (2) single-frame 2D segmentation, where prompts are provided to each slice. The former only applies to videos and 3D modalities, while the latter applies to all datasets. Our results show that SAM 2 exhibits similar performance as SAM under single-frame 2D segmentation, and has variable performance under multi-frame 3D segmentation depending on the choices of slices to annotate, the direction of the propagation, the predictions utilized during the propagation, etc. We believe our work enhances the understanding of SAM 2's behavior in the medical field and provides directions for future work in adapting SAM 2 to this domain. Our code is available at: https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/segment-anything2-medical-evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Vision Foundation Models Ready for Out-of-the-Box Medical Image Registration?

    eess.IV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a benchmark of four breast MRI registration tasks, the SAM encoder outperforms classical optimization methods for gross breast alignment but not for fine fibroglandular tissue, and medical pre-training did not help.

  2. SAM-I2V: Upgrading SAM to Support Promptable Video Segmentation with Less than 0.2% Training Cost

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAM-I2V upgrades SAM to video segmentation with three lightweight modules (temporal integrator, selective memory, memory prompts), reaching about 90% of SAM 2.1's average J&F at 0.2% of its training cost.

  3. Enhancing MedSAM with a Lightweight Box Predictor for Medical Image Segmentation

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Enhances MedSAM with a 1.6M-parameter Box Predictor trained in two stages to convert single clicks to bounding boxes, reporting Dice scores of 0.89-0.98 on four medical datasets across CT, MRI, and ultrasound.

Pith tools