Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Prompt Refinement or Fine-tuning? Best Practices for using LLMs in Computational Social Science Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.01346 v1 pith:KGQEOHWW submitted 2024-08-02 cs.CY cs.CLphysics.soc-ph

classification cs.CYcs.CLphysics.soc-ph
keywords bestpracticessocialtaskscomplexcomputationaldatamodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models are expressive tools that enable complex tasks of text understanding within Computational Social Science. Their versatility, while beneficial, poses a barrier for establishing standardized best practices within the field. To bring clarity on the values of different strategies, we present an overview of the performance of modern LLM-based classification methods on a benchmark of 23 social knowledge tasks. Our results point to three best practices: select models with larger vocabulary and pre-training corpora; avoid simple zero-shot in favor of AI-enhanced prompting; fine-tune on task-specific data, and consider more complex forms instruction-tuning on multiple datasets only when only training data is more abundant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Extracting Participation in Collective Action from Social Media

    cs.SI 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new classifier suite detects and levels expressions of collective action participation in Reddit comments, reaching weighted F1=0.71 for binary detection.

Pith tools