Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finite Sample Valid Inference via Calibrated Bootstrap

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.16763 v1 pith:GC2LJK2G submitted 2024-08-29 stat.ME stat.CO

classification stat.MEstat.CO
keywords alphamethodtextitbootstrapparameterresamplingalgorithmapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

While widely used as a general method for uncertainty quantification, the bootstrap method encounters difficulties that raise concerns about its validity in practical applications. This paper introduces a new resampling-based method, termed $\textit{calibrated bootstrap}$, designed to generate finite sample-valid parametric inference from a sample of size $n$. The central idea is to calibrate an $m$-out-of-$n$ resampling scheme, where the calibration parameter $m$ is determined against inferential pivotal quantities derived from the cumulative distribution functions of loss functions in parameter estimation. The method comprises two algorithms. The first, named $\textit{resampling approximation}$ (RA), employs a $\textit{stochastic approximation}$ algorithm to find the value of the calibration parameter $m=m_\alpha$ for a given $\alpha$ in a manner that ensures the resulting $m$-out-of-$n$ bootstrapped $1-\alpha$ confidence set is valid. The second algorithm, termed $\textit{distributional resampling}$ (DR), is developed to further select samples of bootstrapped estimates from the RA step when constructing $1-\alpha$ confidence sets for a range of $\alpha$ values is of interest. The proposed method is illustrated and compared to existing methods using linear regression with and without $L_1$ penalty, within the context of a high-dimensional setting and a real-world data application. The paper concludes with remarks on a few open problems worthy of consideration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The typicality principle and its implications for statistics and data science

    math.ST 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A typicality principle that penalizes parameter values under which observed data look atypical is shown to fix maximum likelihood failures in three examples and to yield calibrated plausibility regions.

Pith tools