REVIEW 3 cited by
AI Meets the Classroom: When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The effect of large language models (LLMs) in education is debated: Previous research shows that LLMs can help as well as hurt learning. In two pre-registered and incentivized laboratory experiments, we find no effect of LLMs on overall learning outcomes. In exploratory analyses and a field study, we provide evidence that the effect of LLMs on learning outcomes depends on usage behavior. Students who substitute some of their learning activities with LLMs (e.g., by generating solutions to exercises) increase the volume of topics they can learn about but decrease their understanding of each topic. Students who complement their learning activities with LLMs (e.g., by asking for explanations) do not increase topic volume but do increase their understanding. We also observe that LLMs widen the gap between students with low and high prior knowledge. While LLMs show great potential to improve learning, their use must be tailored to the educational context and students' needs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Generative AI Availability, Grades, and Student Satisfaction at a Large University
In a large-U.S.-university panel, courses with more GenAI-susceptible assessment weight show no significant post-ChatGPT rise in grades, withdrawal, or failure once pandemic effects are modeled; satisfaction effects a...
-
Artificial or Human Intelligence?
A theoretical model shows that AI's sharp capability cutoff and hallucination rate create a discontinuous gap in student ability around the AI frontier, and that AI-free assignments can correct students' overestimatio...
-
Structured Prompts, Better Outcomes? Exploring the Effects of a Structured Interface with ChatGPT in a Graduate Robotics Course
A structured prompting interface temporarily increased clear code-focused prompts and self-written input, but behaviors did not transfer to free ChatGPT use, and learning and performance did not improve.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.