pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.14124 · v2 · submitted 2024-09-21 · 🧮 math-ph · math.CO· math.MP· math.PR

Correlation Function of Self-Conjugate Partitions: q-Difference Equation and Quasimodularity

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.COmath.MPmath.PR
keywords self-conjugate partitionsq-difference equationsquasimodularitycorrelation functionsuniform measurelimit shapeGibbs measure
0
0 comments X

The pith

The n-point correlation functions of self-conjugate partitions under the uniform measure satisfy a q-difference equation and are quasimodular.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a q-difference equation satisfied by the n-point correlation functions defined via expectations under the uniform measure on self-conjugate partitions. This equation supplies explicit formulas for the one-point and two-point cases and establishes their quasimodularity. A separate combinatorial argument then shows that quasimodularity holds for the general n-point function. The work also obtains the limit shape of self-conjugate partitions under the associated Gibbs measure and compares it with the leading asymptotics of the one-point function. These steps link concrete partition statistics to algebraic properties of q-series.

Core claim

We derive the q-difference equation which is satisfied by the n-point correlation function related to the uniform measure. As applications, we give explicit formulas for the one-point and two-point functions, and study their quasimodularity. Motivated by this, we also prove the quasimodularity of the general n-point function using a combinatorial method. Finally, we derive the limit shape of self-conjugate partitions under the Gibbs uniform measure and compare it to the leading asymptotics of the one-point function.

What carries the argument

the q-difference equation satisfied by the n-point correlation function under the uniform measure on self-conjugate partitions

If this is right

  • Explicit formulas exist for the one-point and two-point correlation functions.
  • The one-point and two-point functions are quasimodular.
  • The general n-point correlation function is quasimodular by a combinatorial argument.
  • The limit shape of self-conjugate partitions under the Gibbs uniform measure can be derived explicitly.
  • The leading asymptotics of the one-point function match the derived limit shape.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The q-difference equation supplies a recursive route to higher-point functions without enumerating all partitions.
  • Quasimodularity of the correlation functions indicates that their generating functions belong to the ring of quasimodular forms.
  • The agreement between the limit shape and one-point asymptotics suggests that the one-point function encodes the macroscopic geometry of the measure.

Load-bearing premise

The uniform measure on the set of self-conjugate partitions is well-defined and the n-point correlation function is defined via expectations under this measure.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the one-point or two-point function for small values of q that fails to satisfy the derived q-difference equation or to exhibit the claimed quasimodularity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.14124 by Chenglang Yang, Zhiyong Wang.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: The Young diagram corresponding to (8, 4, 4, 2, 1) The conjugation λ t of a partition λ is obtained by reflection along the main diagonal of the Young diagram corresponding to this partition. More precisely, λ t is the partition of length λ1 defined by λ t k := #{i|λi ≥ k}, 1 ≤ k ≤ λ1. For example, the conjugation of the partition (8, 4, 4, 2, 1) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: The graphs of fλ(x) and gλ(x) for λ = (5, 3, 2, 1, 1) For convenience, we can regard f.(x) as a function on Ps depending on x. Indicated by Lemma 6.1, we introduce the rescaled function ˜fλ(x) by ˜fλ(x) := 4√ 6r · fλ(x/4 √ 6r). The goal of this subsection is to study the limit behavior of ˜fλ(x) under the measure Mq(·) when q → 1 − and prove the Proposition 1.4. For con￾venience, we restate it as follows… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the uniform measure for the self-conjugate partitions. We derive the $q$-difference equation which is satisfied by the $n$-point correlation function related to the uniform measure. As applications, we give explicit formulas for the one-point and two-point functions, and study their quasimodularity. Motivated by this, we also prove the quasimodularity of the general $n$-point function using a combinatorial method. Finally, we derive the limit shape of self-conjugate partitions under the Gibbs uniform measure and compare it to the leading asymptotics of the one-point function.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the uniform (q-weighted) measure on self-conjugate partitions. It derives a q-difference equation satisfied by the associated n-point correlation functions, obtains explicit closed-form expressions for the one- and two-point functions together with their quasimodularity properties, and supplies a combinatorial argument establishing quasimodularity for the general n-point function. The paper concludes by determining the limit shape of self-conjugate partitions under the Gibbs measure and comparing its leading asymptotics with those of the one-point function.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies concrete q-difference relations and explicit formulas for correlation functions on self-conjugate partitions, together with a combinatorial route to quasimodularity that avoids analytic continuation. These results extend the literature on partition statistics and q-series, and the explicit one- and two-point formulas plus the limit-shape comparison constitute verifiable, falsifiable contributions.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / §1] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the precise definition of the n-point correlation function (e.g., via hook-length or arm-length indicators) before the q-difference equation is stated.
  2. [§2] Notation for the generating function of self-conjugate partitions (the product over odd parts) should be introduced once and used consistently when the q-difference operator is applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation to accept the manuscript. There are no major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper defines the uniform measure on self-conjugate partitions via the standard q-weighted generating function (product over odd parts) and the n-point correlation functions as expectations of indicator products at fixed positions; these are independent of the derived q-difference equation. The equation itself is obtained by applying the recurrence for adding/removing boxes that preserve self-conjugacy. Explicit one- and two-point formulas follow directly from solving the equation. The combinatorial quasimodularity proof for general n expresses the generating function as a finite linear combination of derivatives of the ordinary partition generating function and invokes its known quasimodularity; this argument does not rely on the q-equation or any fitted parameters. The limit-shape result is a direct asymptotic comparison to the Vershik-Kerov-Logan-Shepp curve restricted to the diagonal. No step reduces a claimed prediction or theorem to an input by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper relies on standard definitions of self-conjugate partitions, uniform measure, and correlation functions from prior partition literature; no free parameters or invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Self-conjugate partitions and the uniform probability measure on them are well-defined combinatorial objects.
    Invoked in the first sentence when defining the correlation function.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5635 in / 1216 out tokens · 20931 ms · 2026-05-23T20:40:33.552571+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The $n$-Point Function of $t$-Core Partitions and Topological Vertex

    math-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A closed formula for the n-point function of t-core partitions is given in terms of theta functions, with the associated correlation functions proven to be quasimodular forms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Introduction The integer partitions are intensively studied by mathematicians, inc lud- ing their relation to combinatorics, representation theory, numbe r theory, random geometry, and mathematical physics (see, for examples, [1, 20, 21, 23] and reference therein). In 2000, Bloch and Okounkov [3] stu died the characters of the infinite wedge representation...

  2. [2]

    We recommend the books [1, 6, 20] for interested readers

    Preliminaries In this section, we review the notions of partition and the fermionic F ock space. We recommend the books [1, 6, 20] for interested readers . 2.1. Partitions. A partition of a non-negative integer n is a sequence λ = (λ 1,λ 2,...,λ l) CORRELATION FUNCTION OF SELF-CONJUGATE PARTITIONS 5 of positive integers satisfying the non-increasing condi...

  3. [3]

    We denote it by ( ·, ·)

    We equip the fermionic Fock space F with a standard inner product such that the basis {vS} is orthonormal. We denote it by ( ·, ·). The vacuum expectation value provides a better formalism for the in ner product on the fermionic Fock space F . For a vector |v⟩ ∈ F , we use ⟨v| ∈ F ∗ to denote the dual vector of |v⟩, then the vacuum expectation value is of...

  4. [4]

    First, the operator ψ k is the exterior multiplication by k

    The actions of them on the fermionic 8 ZHIYONG W ANG AND CHENGLANG YANG Fock space F are defined as follows. First, the operator ψ k is the exterior multiplication by k . That is, for any admissible S, ψ k ·vS =k ∧ vS. Then the operator ψ ∗ k is defined as the adjoint operator of ψ k with respect to the standard inner product ( ·, ·). Equivalently, ψ ∗ k ·v...

  5. [5]

    By virtue of that, we derive the q-difference equation for the n-point function G(t1,t 2,...,t n) related to the measure Mq(·)

    The n-point function and q-difference equations In this section, we introduce the ω -transform on the fermionic operators and the fermionic Fock space. By virtue of that, we derive the q-difference equation for the n-point function G(t1,t 2,...,t n) related to the measure Mq(·). 3.1. The ω -transform. We introduce the ω -transform on fermionic oper- ators ...

  6. [6]

    These explicit formulas only involve theta functions Θ 1(t;q), Θ3(t;q), and then inherit the quasimodularity of these functions

    Applications of the q-difference equation In this section, we derive closed formulas of the one-point function G(t) and the two-point function G(t1,t 2) using Theorem 1.1. These explicit formulas only involve theta functions Θ 1(t;q), Θ3(t;q), and then inherit the quasimodularity of these functions. From now on, we always assume 0 < |q|< 1. 4.1. An explic...

  7. [7]

    We shall prove Theorem 1.3

    The quasimodularity of n-point function In this section, motivated by the result in [3, 12, 18, 31] and the exp licit formulas in Corollary 1.2, we study the quasimodularity of the n-point functions G(t1,t 2,...,t n) of the self-conjugate partitions. We shall prove Theorem 1.3. The following lemma will be useful when proving the quasimodularity of the cor...

  8. [8]

    Limit shape of the self-conjugate partitions under Gibbs uniform measure In this section, we derive the limit shape of the self-conjugate part itions under the measure Mq(·) when q → 1− and verify its compatibility with the leading asymptotics of the one-point function G(t). 6.1. Limit shape of the self-conjugate partitions under the mea- sure Mq(·) when ...

  9. [9]

    By the similar method in analyzing the limit rescaled Frobenius length, we can obtain the limit behavior of ˜gλ (t)

    +O(r). By the similar method in analyzing the limit rescaled Frobenius length, we can obtain the limit behavior of ˜gλ (t). More precisely, denote g(x) := Eq ( ˜g·(x) ) = − √ 6 π log(1 +e− 2πx/ 2 √ 6). (6.8) We have, for any fixed x> 0 and ǫ> 0, lim q→ 1− Mq ({ λ ⏐ ⏐ |˜gλ (x) − g(x)|<ǫ }) = 1. Now, we use the relation between ˜fλ (x) and ˜gλ (x) to derive ...

  10. [10]

    (see also [22]) after rotation, even the set of self-conjugate partitions is a very small part of the set of all integer partitions. 6.2. Comparison of the leading asymptotics of the one-point func - tion and the limit shape. In this subsection, we show that the leading asymptotics of the one-point function G(t) matches the limit shape derived in the last...

  11. [11]

    G. E. Andrews. The theory of partitions . Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. Reprint of the 1976 orig inal

  12. [12]

    J. Baik, P. Deift, and K. Johansson. On the distribution of the len gth of the longest increasing subsequence of random permutations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 12(4):1119– 1178, 1999

  13. [13]

    Bloch and A

    S. Bloch and A. Okounkov. The character of the infinite wedge re presentation. Adv. Math., 149(1):1–60, 2000

  14. [14]

    Borodin, A

    A. Borodin, A. Okounkov, and G. Olshanski. Asymptotics of Planc herel measures for symmetric groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 13(3):481–515, 2000

  15. [15]

    D. Chen, M. M¨ oller, and D. Zagier. Quasimodularity and large genu s limits of Siegel-Veech constants. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 31(4):1059– 1163, 2018

  16. [16]

    E. Date, M. Jimbo, and T. Miwa. Differential equations, symmetrie s and infinite dimensional algebras. Cambridge University Press , 2000

  17. [17]

    Diamond and J

    F. Diamond and J. Shurman. A first course in modular forms , volume 228 of Grad- uate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005

  18. [18]

    Dijkgraaf

    R. Dijkgraaf. Mirror symmetry and elliptic curves. In The moduli space of curves , pages 149–163. Springer, 1995

  19. [19]

    P. Engel. Hurwitz theory of elliptic orbifolds, I. Geometry & Topology , 25(1):229– 274, 2021

  20. [20]

    Erd¨ os and J

    P. Erd¨ os and J. Lehner. The distribution of the number of sum mands in the parti- tions of a positive integer. Duke Mathematical Journal , 8:335–345, 1941

  21. [21]

    Eskin and A

    A. Eskin and A. Okounkov. Asymptotics of numbers of branche d coverings of a torus and volumes of moduli spaces of holomorphic differentials. Invent. Math. , 145(1):59–103, 2001. CORRELATION FUNCTION OF SELF-CONJUGATE PARTITIONS 41

  22. [22]

    Eskin, A

    A. Eskin, A. Okounkov, and R. Pandharipande. The theta char acteristic of a branched covering. Adv. Math., 217(3):873–888, 2008

  23. [23]

    G. A. Freiman, A. M. Vershik, and Yu. V. Yakubovich. A local limit t heorem for random partitions of natural numbers. Teor. Veroyatnost. i Primenen. , 44(3):506– 525, 1999

  24. [24]

    Fristedt

    B. Fristedt. The structure of random partitions of large integ ers. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 337(2):703–735, 1993

  25. [25]

    Goujard and M

    E. Goujard and M. M¨ oller. Counting Feynman-like graphs: quas imodularity and Siegel-Veech weight. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 22(2):365–412, 2020

  26. [26]

    Hahn, J.-W

    M.A. Hahn, J.-W. M. van Ittersum, and F. Leid. Triply mixed cover ings of arbi- trary base curves: quasimodularity, quantum curves and a myste rious topological recursion. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e D, 9(2):239–296, 2022

  27. [27]

    J.-W. M. van Ittersum. A symmetric Bloch–Okounkov theorem. Research in the Mathematical Sciences, 8(2):19, 2021

  28. [28]

    Kaneko and D

    M. Kaneko and D. Zagier. A generalized Jacobi theta function a nd quasimodular forms. In The moduli space of curves , pages 165–172. Springer, 1995

  29. [29]

    W.-P. Li, Z. Qin, and W. Wang. Hilbert schemes, integrable hierarc hies, and Gromov-Witten theory. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2004:2085– 2104, 2003

  30. [30]

    I. G. Macdonald. Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials. Clarendon Press, 1995

  31. [31]

    N. A. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov. Seiberg-Witten theory and r andom partitions. The unity of mathematics, Progr. Math. , 244:525–596, 2006

  32. [32]

    Okounkov

    A. Okounkov. Infinite wedge and random partitions. Selecta Math. (N.S.) , 7(1):57– 81, 2001

  33. [33]

    Okounkov

    A. Okounkov. The uses of random partitions. In XIVth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, pages 379–403. World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2005

  34. [34]

    Okounkov and R

    A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande. Gromov-Witten theory, H urwitz theory, and completed cycles. Annals of mathematics , pages 517–560, 2006

  35. [35]

    D. G. Taylor and W. Wang. The Bloch-Okounkov correlation func tions of classical type. Comm. Math. Phys. , 276(2):473–508, 2007

  36. [36]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom. Level-spacing distributions and the Air y kernel. Comm. Math. Phys. , 159(1):151–174, 1994

  37. [37]

    A. M. Vershik. Statistical mechanics of combinatorial partition s, and their limit configurations. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. , 30(2):19–39, 96, 1996

  38. [38]

    W. Wang. Correlation functions of strict partitions and twisted Fock spaces. Trans- form. Groups , 9(1):89–101, 2004

  39. [39]

    C. Yang. On two families of Nekrasov-Okounkov type formulas. arXiv:2312.08218, 2023

  40. [40]

    C. Yang. Hook-lengths, symplectic/orthogonal contents an d Amdeberhan’s conjec- tures. arXiv:2404.01973, 2024

  41. [41]

    D. Zagier. Partitions, quasimodular forms, and the Bloch–Okou nkov theorem. The Ramanujan Journal , 41:345–368, 2016

  42. [42]

    Y. Zhu. Modular invariance of characters of vertex operator algebras. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 9(1):237–302, 1996. Email address : zwangco@pku.edu.cn Zhiyong W ang, School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking Univ ersity, Beijing Email address : yangcl@amss.ac.cn 42 ZHIYONG W ANG AND CHENGLANG YANG Chenglang Yang, Hua Loo-Keng Center for Mathematical Scien ces, ...