Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Drift in Extreme Turning with Active Exploration and Gaussian Process Based MPC

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05740 v3 pith:ROTDIA47 submitted 2024-10-08 cs.RO cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.SYeess.SY
keywords explorationdrifterrormodelvehiclecontroldecreasesprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Extreme cornering in racing often leads to large sideslip angles, presenting a significant challenge for vehicle control. Conventional vehicle controllers struggle to manage this scenario, necessitating the use of a drifting controller. However, the large sideslip angle in drift conditions introduces model mismatch, which in turn affects control precision. To address this issue, we propose a model correction drift controller that integrates Model Predictive Control (MPC) with Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). GPR is employed to correct vehicle model mismatches during both drift equilibrium solving and the MPC optimization process. Additionally, the variance from GPR is utilized to actively explore different cornering drifting velocities, aiming to minimize trajectory tracking errors. The proposed algorithm is validated through simulations on the Simulink-Carsim platform and experiments with a 1:10 scale RC vehicle. In the simulation, the average lateral error with GPR is reduced by 52.8% compared to the non-GPR case. Incorporating exploration further decreases this error by 27.1%. The velocity tracking Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) also decreases by 10.6% with exploration. In the RC car experiment, the average lateral error with GPR is 36.7% lower, and exploration further leads to a 29.0% reduction. Moreover, the velocity tracking RMSE decreases by 7.2% with the inclusion of exploration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Residual Koopman Model Predictive Control for Enhanced Vehicle Dynamics with Small On-Track Data Input

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Residual Koopman MPC adds a learned correction to a kinematic-baseline LMPC, cutting required training data to about 20% of standard Koopman MPC and improving lateral and heading tracking.

Pith tools