Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

How Numerical Precision Affects Arithmetical Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13857 v2 pith:XRIKSVBO submitted 2024-10-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML
keywords numericalprecisionllmstasksarithmeticcapabilitiesmathematicalarithmetical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the remarkable success of Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) across various domains, understanding and enhancing their mathematical capabilities remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we conduct a rigorous theoretical analysis of LLMs' mathematical abilities, with a specific focus on their arithmetic performances. We identify numerical precision as a key factor that influences their effectiveness in arithmetical tasks. Our results show that Transformers operating with low numerical precision fail to address arithmetic tasks, such as iterated addition and integer multiplication, unless the model size grows super-polynomially with respect to the input length. In contrast, Transformers with standard numerical precision can efficiently handle these tasks with significantly smaller model sizes. We further support our theoretical findings through empirical experiments that explore the impact of varying numerical precision on arithmetic tasks, providing valuable insights for improving the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Basis Transformers for Multi-Task Tabular Regression

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Basis transformers beat fine-tuned LLMs on 34 multi-task tabular regression datasets while using five times fewer parameters and no data preprocessing.

  2. Trade-offs in Image Generation: How Do Different Dimensions Interact?

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark and VLM-as-judge metric map trade-offs among ten image-generation dimensions across 14 models, with a visualization called DTM.

  3. Univariate to Multivariate: LLMs as Zero-Shot Predictors for Time-Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMPred improves LLM-based forecasting by frequency-decomposing inputs and adding an MLP post-processor, but the reported gains largely reflect the trained post-processor and a narrowed multivariate comparison rather ...

  4. Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A three-model, three-dataset LLM math evaluation using a multi-dimensional reasoning rubric, undermined by contradictory accuracy tables.

Pith tools