REVIEW 1 cited by
Do Discrete Self-Supervised Representations of Speech Capture Tone Distinctions?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Discrete representations of speech, obtained from Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) foundation models, are widely used, especially where there are limited data for the downstream task, such as for a low-resource language. Typically, discretization of speech into a sequence of symbols is achieved by unsupervised clustering of the latents from an SSL model. Our study evaluates whether discrete symbols - found using k-means - adequately capture tone in two example languages, Mandarin and Yoruba. We compare latent vectors with discrete symbols, obtained from HuBERT base, MandarinHuBERT, or XLS-R, for vowel and tone classification. We find that using discrete symbols leads to a substantial loss of tone information, even for language-specialised SSL models. We suggest that discretization needs to be task-aware, particularly for tone-dependent downstream tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Benchmarking Prosody Encoding in Discrete Speech Tokens
A benchmark study shows which speech discretization choices preserve prosodic information, measured by how much token sequences change when prosody is artificially altered.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.