REVIEW 2 cited by
SAM Decoding: Speculative Decoding via Suffix Automaton
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Speculative decoding (SD) has been demonstrated as an effective technique for lossless LLM inference acceleration. Retrieval-based SD methods, one kind of model-free method, have yielded promising speedup, but they often rely on incomplete retrieval resources, inefficient retrieval methods, and are constrained to certain domains. This paper presents a novel retrieval-based speculative decoding method that adapts suffix automaton (SAM) for efficient and accurate draft generation by utilizing common text corpus and dynamic text sequence. Unlike existing $n$-gram matching methods, SAM-Decoding finds the exact longest suffix match, achieving an average time complexity of O(1) per generation step of SAM update and suffix retrieval. It can also integrate with existing methods, adaptively selecting a draft generation strategy based on match length to generalize to broader domains. Extensive experiments on Spec-Bench show that our method is $18\%+$ faster than other retrieval-based SD methods. Additionally, when combined with advanced EAGLE-2, it provides an additional speedup of $3.28\%$ -- $11.13\%$ across various-sized LLM backbones. Our code is available at our \href{https://github.com/hyx1999/SAM-Decoding}{repository}.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Trees from Marginals: Autoregressive drafting with factorized priors
Weaver restores conditional dependencies on top-K factorized marginals to build high-acceptance draft trees, plus a fused GDN tree-verify kernel, yielding 4.37× AR speedup and 24.7% over DFlash.
-
Shallow Preference Signals: Large Language Model Aligns Even Better with Truncated Data?
Preference signals in LLM alignment are concentrated in early response tokens, so models trained on data truncated to the first half perform as well as or better than those trained on full responses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.