Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

SURDS: Benchmarking Spatial Understanding and Reasoning in Driving Scenarios with Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.13112 v3 pith:AOL7L6UU submitted 2024-11-20 cs.CV

SURDS: Benchmarking Spatial Understanding and Reasoning in Driving Scenarios with Vision Language Models

classification cs.CV
keywords spatialreasoningsurdsalignmentbenchmarkdrivingevaluationvlms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate spatial reasoning in outdoor environments - covering geometry, object pose, and inter-object relationships - is fundamental to downstream tasks such as mapping, motion forecasting, and high-level planning in autonomous driving. We introduce SURDS, a large-scale benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of vision language models (VLMs). Built on the nuScenes dataset, SURDS comprises 41,080 vision-question-answer training instances and 9,250 evaluation samples, spanning six spatial categories: orientation, depth estimation, pixel-level localization, pairwise distance, lateral ordering, and front-behind relations. We benchmark leading general-purpose VLMs, including GPT, Gemini, and Qwen, revealing persistent limitations in fine-grained spatial understanding. To address these deficiencies, we go beyond static evaluation and explore whether alignment techniques can improve spatial reasoning performance. Specifically, we propose a reinforcement learning-based alignment scheme leveraging spatially grounded reward signals - capturing both perception-level accuracy (location) and reasoning consistency (logic). We further incorporate final-answer correctness and output-format rewards to guide fine-grained policy adaptation. Our GRPO-aligned variant achieves an overall score of 40.80 in the SURDS benchmark. Notably, it outperforms proprietary systems such as GPT-4o (13.30) and Gemini-2.0-flash (35.71). To our best knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that reinforcement learning-based alignment can significantly and consistently enhance the spatial reasoning capabilities of VLMs in real-world driving contexts. We release the SURDS benchmark, evaluation toolkit, and GRPO alignment code through: https://github.com/XiandaGuo/Drive-MLLM.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OmniCoT: A Benchmark for Global and Multi-Step Panoramic Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    OmniCoT is a new panoramic reasoning benchmark with 6.7K eval, 1K real, and 14.3K training examples plus a two-stage SFT+GRPO training method to enforce global 360-degree consistency.

  2. GeoDrive-Bench: Benchmarking Region-Specific Multimodal Reasoning in Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GeoDrive-Bench is a new multimodal benchmark and distillation method for testing and improving VLMs on region-specific traffic-rule reasoning in autonomous driving across six countries.

  3. TPS-Drive: Task-Guided Representation Purification for VLM-based Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TPS-Drive uses an agent-centric tokenizer supervised by a frozen 3D detection head to purify VLM spatial representations, enabling better scene forecasting and lower collision rates on nuScenes and NAVSIM benchmarks.

  4. Steadily moving semi-infinite fracture in plane poroelasticity

    physics.geo-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new coupled boundary integral method models steadily moving semi-infinite fractures in plane poroelasticity, solving for mechanical deformation and fluid exchange with verification on analytical test cases.

  5. ReMemNav: A Rethinking and Memory-Augmented Framework for Zero-Shot Object Navigation

    cs.RO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    ReMemNav improves zero-shot object navigation success and efficiency by integrating episodic memory and rethinking with VLMs, achieving SR/SPL gains of 1.7%/7.0% on HM3D v0.1, 18.2%/11.1% on HM3D v0.2, and 8.7%/7.9% on MP3D.

  6. OmniDrive-R1: Reinforcement-driven Interleaved Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought for Trustworthy Vision-Language Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    OmniDrive-R1 boosts VLM reasoning score from 51.77% to 80.35% and answer accuracy from 37.81% to 73.62% on DriveLMM-o1 via reinforcement-driven interleaved multi-modal chain-of-thought with annotation-free grounding.

  7. Descriptor: Distance-Annotated Traffic Perception Question Answering (DTPQA)

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DTPQA is a new VQA benchmark consisting of synthetic and real-world traffic images with distance annotations to isolate and measure VLM perception capabilities for driving decisions.

  8. Steadily moving semi-infinite fracture in plane poroelasticity

    physics.geo-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    XEmbodied achieves SOTA on 18 embodied VQA benchmarks by fusing 3D geometric tokens and distilled physical cues into a 30B VLM with progressive curriculum training.

  9. XEmbodied: A Foundation Model with Enhanced Geometric and Physical Cues for Large-Scale Embodied Environments

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    XEmbodied is a foundation model that integrates 3D geometric and physical signals into VLMs using a 3D Adapter and Efficient Image-Embodied Adapter, plus progressive curriculum and RL post-training, to improve spatial...