Schr\"odinger Bridge Problem for Jump Diffusions

Andrei Zlotchevski; Linan Chen

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Schr\"odinger Bridge Problem for Jump Diffusions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that for jump-diffusion reference measures, Schrödinger bridges are strong limits of h-transforms by harmonic functions, with explicit drift and jump-measure formulas.

desk verdict Solid jump-diffusion Schrödinger bridge theory with a real approximation theorem, but the abstract oversells Assumption (A3): for the stable-like class only finite-dimensional convergence of h-transforms of a mollified reference is proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13765 v2 pith:222GOYGH submitted 2024-11-21 math.PR cs.ITmath.ITmath.OC

Andrei Zlotchevski , Linan Chen This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRcs.ITmath.ITmath.OC MSC 35Q9345K0560H1060H2060H3094A17

keywords Schrödingerbridgesh-transformjumpdiffusionsnon-localLévy-typeoperatorsKLdivergencesystemmartingaleproblemstable-likeprocesses

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tackles the Schrödinger bridge problem when the reference process is a jump diffusion: given initial and terminal distributions, find the path measure closest to the reference in relative entropy. It establishes that the optimal bridge is an $h$-transform of a modified reference, and when the bridge function is not harmonic, it can still be reached as the strong limit of $h$-transforms by genuinely harmonic functions. This matters because the classical diffusion theory of Schrödinger bridges does not automatically carry over: jump diffusions have non-local generators and limited regularity theory. The result gives explicit formulas for the transformed generator, including the new drift and the rescaled jump measure, and extends the dynamic Schrödinger system to the jump setting.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $h$-transform of a jump-diffusion path measure, defined by $\mathbf{P}^h=\mathbf{1}_{\{X_0\in A_0\}}r_0^{-1}(h(T,X_T)/h(0,X_0))\mathbf{P}$ for a non-negative $h$ satisfying the mean-value property. If $h$ is harmonic, i.e. $(\partial_t+L)h=0$, then $\mathbf{P}^h$ solves the martingale problem for a transformed jump-diffusion operator $L^h$ with the explicit drift and jump measure above; equivalently it is a Girsanov transform with those coefficients. The approximation machinery approximates the Schrödinger-system function $g$ by $C_c^\infty$ functions $g_k$ (via simple functions, Lusin's theorem, and mollification), and Assumption (A3) makes each $h_k=\int g_k(y)P_{t,T}(x,dy)$ harmonic, so the corresponding $h$-transforms converge strongly to $\hat{\mathbf{P}}$.

What would settle it

Take the α-stable-like jump operator of Section 5.3 with a discontinuous Schrödinger-system function g and check whether sup_A |P_{h_k}(A)-\hat{P}(A)| tends to 0; the paper proves only finite-dimensional convergence in that case, so exhibiting a counterexample to the vanishing total-variation distance would show the strong-convergence claim depends essentially on (A3).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under Assumptions (A1)/(A2) and (A3), the solution $\hat{\mathbf{P}}$ to the SBP for a jump-diffusion reference $\mathbf{R}$ is the $h$-transform of $\mathbf{P}$ by $h(t,x)=\int g(y)P_{t,T}(x,dy)$, where $(f,g)$ solves the Schrödinger system. When $h$ is only measurable, the bridge is still recovered as $\lim_k \sup_{A\in\mathcal{F}}|\mathbf{P}_{h_k}(A)-\hat{\mathbf{P}}(A)|=0$, with $h_k(t,x)=\int g_k(y)P_{t,T}(x,dy)$ for smooth compactly supported approximations $g_k$ of $g$; each $h_k$ is harmonic, so each $\mathbf{P}_{h_k}$ is a classical harmonic $h$-transform. In the smooth stochastic-flow case, $\hat{\mathbf{P}}$ is itself an $h$-transform by a harmonic $\phi$, the marginal density of $\hat{\mathbf{P}}$ at time $t$ is $\phi(t,x)\hat{\phi}(t,x)$, and $(\phi,\hat{\phi})$ solves the backward-forward PIDE system. The generator of the bridge has drift $b^h=b+\sigma\sigma^T\nabla\log h+\int_{|z|\le 1}(h(x+\gamma)-h(x))/h(x)\,\gamma\,\nu(dz)$ and jump measure $\nu^h(dz)=(h(x+\gamma)/h(x))\nu(dz)$.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on Assumption (A3): the conditional expectation h(t,x)=E[g(X_T)|X_t=x] must be smooth enough in time and space and satisfy the backward equation for every smooth compactly supported terminal function g, and if that regularity fails the approximating functions are no longer harmonic and the strong-convergence proof stops working.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any jump-diffusion reference satisfying (A3), the bridge can be approximated by harmonic h-transforms built from explicit smooth approximations of the Schrödinger-system function, so the diffusion-case approximation picture carries over.
The bridge dynamics are explicit: the drift gains the term σσᵀ∇log h plus a jump-induced correction, and the jump measure is tilted by h(x+γ)/h(x), so jumps into regions of higher h become more likely.
In the smooth stochastic-flow setting, the marginal density of the bridge factorizes as φφ̂ and the dynamic Schrödinger system becomes a pair of backward and forward PIDEs, extending the classical diffusion results.
For α-stable-like jump operators where (A3) is not known, h-transforms of mollified operators still converge to the bridge in finite-dimensional distributions, giving a weaker but usable approximation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The explicit g_k construction suggests a numerical route to the bridge: approximate g from endpoint data and evaluate h_k by Monte Carlo transition kernels, without needing a smooth transition density, as long as (A3) is verified.
The tilt factor h(x+γ)/h(x) is the jump analogue of the diffusion drift pull toward high-h regions; one could test in simulation whether bridges of jump diffusions select paths whose jump destinations track the level sets of h.
For stable-like generators, the gap between finite-dimensional and strong convergence is likely not just technical: if (A3) fails, strong convergence would probably require heat-kernel or gradient estimates that the paper does not supply.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper does what it claims in the large: it carries the Schrödinger bridge machinery from diffusions to jump diffusions, and the main theorems are mostly proved. The genuinely new pieces are the explicit h-transform generator transformation (Lemma 3.7), the strong-convergence approximation of the bridge by harmonic h-transforms under Assumption (A3) (Theorem 4.4), the PIDE formulation for smooth stochastic flows (Theorem 5.3), and the honest finite-dimensional convergence result for stable-like operators (Theorem 5.6). The construction of the approximating functions from the Schrödinger data is explicit and usable, and the paper carefully handles non-negative h and zero sets. The Poisson example is a nice sanity check. Citations to the diffusion SBP and jump-process literature look fair and appropriate.

The soft spot is the gap between the abstract and the theorems. Calling (A3) a 'mild assumption' is too generous: it requires the semigroup applied to every smooth compactly supported g to produce a C^{1,2} solution of the backward equation. The paper itself concedes this is scarce for jump diffusions. The strong convergence of Theorem 4.4 rests on it. For the stable-like class that the paper highlights, Theorem 5.6 gives only convergence in finite-dimensional distributions, and the approximating Q_k are h-transforms of the mollified reference measures P_k, not of the original reference R. So the abstract's 'strong-convergence limit' is not established for that class. This is a framing issue rather than a hidden mathematical error; the proofs themselves look coherent, and the paper is open about the limitation in Section 5.3. The fix is straightforward: temper the abstract and state the scope precisely.

Minor nit: the reader's report flags that Corollary 3.10 does not restate a condition from Theorem 3.9. I checked and the 'under the same setting' wording does cover it, so this is a readability issue, not a real gap.

Who is this for? People working on Schrödinger bridges, stochastic control with jumps, or generative modeling with jump processes will get a rigorous but conventional extension rather than a conceptual break. The paper deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review and ask the authors to align the abstract with what is actually proved, but the core is solid and publishable after that revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Schrödinger bridge problem (SBP) when the reference measure is the law of a jump diffusion. It develops an h-transform theory for jump diffusions in two complementary formulations: a martingale-problem/generator approach under Assumption (A1) and an SDE/Girsanov approach under Assumption (A2). The transformed drift and jump measure are given explicitly in Lemma 3.7, and the corresponding martingale problem and SDE statements appear in Theorem 3.8 and Corollary 3.10. The paper then connects the SBP solution to an h-transform: under a regularity assumption (A3), Theorem 4.4 shows that the SBP solution is the strong (total-variation) limit of h-transforms by harmonic functions, with the approximating functions constructed explicitly from the Schrödinger system data. Under additional smoothness assumptions and existence of a transition density, the paper derives a dynamic Schrödinger system of PIDEs and a product-form marginal density (Theorems 5.3 and 5.4). Finally, for α-stable-like jump operators that may fail (A3), a mollification procedure is proposed and convergence in finite-dimensional distributions is claimed in Theorem 5.6.

Significance. If the results hold as stated, this is a useful contribution to the Schrödinger bridge literature, which has largely been confined to diffusion references. The paper correctly identifies the role of transition-semigroup regularity, gives explicit formulas for the transformed generator and SDE, and provides a constructive approximation scheme. The proof of Theorem 4.4 is coherent, and the construction is genuinely data-driven: the approximating functions g_k are built from R, ρ0 and ρT, not assumed to solve the target problem. The stable-like extension is potentially valuable but is the weakest part of the paper, and its current proof and framing need work. The paper does not provide code or machine-checked proofs; its value is theoretical.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and Section 1.2] The abstract's claim of obtaining the SBP solution 'under mild assumptions' as 'the strong-convergence limit of a sequence of harmonic h-transforms' is not supported for the advertised general jump-diffusion class. Assumption (A3), stated in Section 1.2 around Eq. (1.4), is a strong C^{1,2} regularity condition on all smoothed conditional expectations; it is not implied by (A1)/(A2), and the paper itself notes in Section 5.3 that the stable-like operators of Eq. (5.8) may not support (A3). For that class, Theorem 5.6 proves only convergence in finite-dimensional distributions, and the approximating Q_k are h-transforms of the mollified measures P_k associated with L_{m_k}, not h-transforms of the original reference R. The abstract and Section 1.2 should be revised to state explicitly that strong convergence of harmonic h-transforms requires (A3).
[Section 5.3] The proof of finite-dimensional convergence in Theorem 5.6 is incomplete. After establishing pointwise convergence of h_k^{(m_k)} to h (Lemma 5.5) and uniform-on-compact convergence of p_{m_k} to p, the displayed formula for Q_k(∩_{i=0}^N {X_{t_i}∈B_i}) is passed to the limit without a dominated-convergence or uniform-integrability argument. The ratio h_k^{(m_k)}(T,x_N)/h_k^{(m_k)}(0,x_0) may be large where h(0,x_0) is small, and no bound is supplied; the same issue affects the assertion that r_k→1. A rigorous argument is needed, for example by using the explicit construction of g_k and the mean-value property to obtain L1 control, or by restricting to compact sets and appealing to tightness. This is load-bearing because Theorem 5.6 is the paper's only positive statement for the stable-like class.

minor comments (5)

[Theorem 4.4] The proof of strong convergence uses only the mean-value property of h_k, which is automatic from the definition h_k(t,x)=∫g_k(y)P_{t,T}(x,dy); the harmonicity supplied by (A3) is not used in the L1-convergence argument. The paper should state explicitly that the measure-convergence part does not require (A3) and that (A3) is needed only to interpret the approximants as harmonic h-transforms with the generator/SDE theory of Section 3.
[Theorem 4.4] The definition of Phk in Eq. (4.9) divides by r_k, which may vanish for finitely many k; since the proof shows r_k→1, the statement should be restricted to k sufficiently large or allow discarding finitely many terms.
[Theorem 3.9] The Girsanov representation is cleaner if the base measure is taken to be \tilde P = 1_{X0∈A0}/r0 P; with the current normalization 1_{τ0>T}/r0 P, the condition P(τ0>T)=r0 in Theorem 3.9 is presented as necessary for the Girsanov interpretation, while Corollary 3.10 does not restate it. Please clarify the normalization and state explicitly that Corollary 3.10 is understood as a Girsanov transformation with respect to \tilde P.
[Section 3.1] There is a typo in the sentence after Lemma 3.4: 'andn which' should read 'and which'.
[Lemma 4.3] The conditional expectation E_R0T[g_k(y)|x] is defined only for R0-a.e. x; writing 'for every x∈Rn' is an abuse of notation and should be qualified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the h-transform representation of the Schrödinger bridge is an explicit consequence of the Schrödinger system, the approximation theorem is conditional on the stated Assumption (A3), and external rather than self-cited regularity results are used where density and smoothness are needed.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is non-circular. The central identity (Theorem 4.2, Eq. 4.3), P̂ = h(T,X_T)/h(0,X_0) P, is proved directly from the Schrödinger system (2.6): h(T,X_T) = g(X_T), h(0,X_0) = E[g(X_T)|X_0], and f(x)h(0,x) = dρ0/dR0(x), so the right-hand side equals f(X0)g(XT)R = P̂. This is a rewriting of the static-SBP factorization, not a derivation of that factorization from the h-transform. Lemma 3.7 is an explicit algebraic computation of L(hf)/h, and the paper states the proof is omitted because the equations are direct computations; it is a lemma, not a prediction. Theorem 4.4 is explicitly conditional on Assumption (A3), which asserts that conditional expectations with C_c^∞ terminal data are C^{1,2} and solve the backward equation; the approximants h_k are harmonic by that hypothesis, and the strong convergence is established through Lemma 4.3 and Scheffé's lemma from the approximation of g by smooth g_k, where the g_k are constructed from the input data R, ρ0, ρT and the given Schrödinger system solution, not from P̂. Section 5.2 uses external Kunita results ([41]) to verify (A3) and derive the PIDE system; Section 5.3 explicitly states that (A3) may not hold for stable-like operators and proves only finite-dimensional convergence of h-transforms of mollified reference measures Q_k (Theorem 5.6). That is a scope limitation relative to the abstract's phrase 'mild assumptions', but it is not circularity. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-citations are load-bearing (the cited Chen, Kunita, Léonard, and heat-kernel works are independent), and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked. The only omitted proof, Theorem 5.3, is flagged as a straightforward consequence of external Theorem 5.2 and does not smuggle the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new postulated entities. Its conclusions rest on existence, Markovicity, and regularity assumptions about the reference jump diffusion, together with standard martingale and density results imported from the cited literature. The only ad hoc structural condition is Assumption (A3), which is the main regularity bridge for the approximation theorem.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption The conclusion of Theorem 2.3 holds: the static SBP has a unique solution and P-hat = f(X0)g(XT)R with f,g solving the Schrödinger system.
Adopted after Theorem 2.3 in Section 2.1; it packages existence of the Schrödinger system solution and the product-form density of the bridge.
domain assumption Assumption (A1): the martingale problem for L has a strong Markov solution in P(Ω).
Section 1.2; needed for the generator-approach h-transform theory in Theorem 3.8.
domain assumption Assumption (A2): the SDE (1.2) has a strong Markov càdlàg weak solution with initial distribution ρ0.
Section 1.2; needed for the Girsanov approach in Theorems 3.9 and 3.10.
ad hoc to paper Assumption (A3): for every g in C_c∞, h(t,x)=∫ g(y) P_{t,T}(x,dy) is C^{1,2} and solves the backward equation.
Section 1.2; the key regularity condition for Theorem 4.4; the paper concedes such results are scarce for jump diffusions.
standard math Assumptions (B) on b, σ, γ ensure the stochastic integrals in (1.2) and the integro-differential operator (1.3) are well defined.
Section 1.1; standard Lévy-Itô integrability and local boundedness conditions.
domain assumption Assumptions (C) in Section 5.2: smooth coefficients, diffeomorphic jump maps, the order condition on the Lévy measure, and nondegeneracy of σσT + KΓ0K^T.
Used to invoke Kunita's stochastic flow density theorem, Theorem 5.2, which provides the transition density regularity behind Theorem 5.3.
domain assumption The α-stable-like operator conditions and heat kernel results from Chen et al. [12] used in Section 5.3.
Used for existence of the transition density and for the mollification convergence argument in Theorem 5.6.
standard math Girsanov theorem for jump diffusions and standard martingale/Dynkin calculus.
Used in the proof of Theorem 3.9 and Corollary 3.10 to identify the h-transform as a Girsanov transform.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Schr\"odinger Bridge Problem for Jump Diffusions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/222GOYGH

@misc{pith2026241113765,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Schr\"odinger Bridge Problem for Jump Diffusions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/222GOYGH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13765}
}

abstract

The Schr\"odinger bridge problem (SBP) seeks to find the measure $\hat{\mathbf{P}}$ on a certain path space which interpolates between state-space distributions $\rho_0$ at time $0$ and $\rho_T$ at time $T$ while minimizing the KL divergence (relative entropy) to a reference path measure $\mathbf{R}$. In this work, we tackle the SBP in the case when $\mathbf{R}$ is the path measure of a jump diffusion. Under mild assumptions, with both the operator theory approach and the stochastic calculus techniques, we establish an $h$-transform theory for jump diffusions and devise an approximation method to achieve the jump-diffusion SBP solution $\hat{\mathbf{P}}$ as the strong-convergence limit of a sequence of harmonic $h$-transforms. To the best of our knowledge, these results are novel in the study of SBP. Moreover, the $h$-transform framework and the approximation method developed in this work are robust and applicable to a relatively general class of jump diffusions. In addition, we examine the SBP of particular types of jump diffusions under additional regularity conditions and extend the existing results on the SBP from the diffusion case to the jump-diffusion setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Trajectory Generator Matching for Time Series
math.NA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

New closed-form drift, diffusion, and Gaussian jump generators for bridge processes enable simulation-free generative modeling of irregularly sampled time series with discontinuities, with learned generators that reco...
Exponential Convergence of the Sinkhorn Algorithm for the Schr\"odinger Bridge with Regime Switching
math.PR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Sinkhorn iterates for regime-switching Schrödinger bridges converge exponentially in relative entropy under compactness and C^2 strictly-positive transition-density assumptions.
Geometric Methods for Stochastic Dynamical Systems
math.DS 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

A textbook-style synthesis claiming that the most probable transition path, the Schrödinger bridge, and α-divergence information geodesics are one geometric idea in the space of probability densities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[1]

Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus

David Applebaum. Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2 editi on, 2009

work page 2009
[2]

Regularity results for stable-like oper ators

Richard F Bass. Regularity results for stable-like oper ators. Journal of Functional Analysis, 257(8):2693–2722, 2009

work page 2009
[3]

An automorphism of product measures

Arne Beurling. An automorphism of product measures. Annals of Mathematics, pages 189–200, 1960

work page 1960
[4]

Hughston, Sebastian Jaimunga l, and Leandro Sánchez- Betancourt

George Bouzianis, Lane P. Hughston, Sebastian Jaimunga l, and Leandro Sánchez- Betancourt. Lévy-Ito models in ﬁnance. Probability Surveys, 18(none):132 – 178, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

The Schrödinger bridge between Gaussian measures has a closed form, 2023

Charlotte Bunne, Ya-Ping Hsieh, Marco Cuturi, and Andre as Krause. The Schrödinger bridge between Gaussian measures has a closed form, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Smooth densities for solutions to stochast ic diﬀerential equations with jumps

Thomas Cass. Smooth densities for solutions to stochast ic diﬀerential equations with jumps. Stochastic processes and their applications, 119(5):1416–1435, 2009

work page 2009
[7]

Periodic homogeniza- tion of nonsymmetric Lévy-type processes

Xin Chen, Zhen-Qing Chen, Takashi Kumagai, and Jian Wang . Periodic homogeniza- tion of nonsymmetric Lévy-type processes. The Annals of Probability, 49(6):2874–2921, 2021

work page 2021
[8]

Heat kernel for n on-local operators with variable order

Xin Chen, Zhen-Qing Chen, and Jian Wang. Heat kernel for n on-local operators with variable order. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 130(6):3574–3647, 2020

work page 2020

Show all 67 references

[9]

Georgiou, and Michele Pavon

Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon. En tropic and displacement interpolation: a computational approach using the Hilbert metric. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 76(6):2375–2396, 2016

2016
[10]

Georgiou, and Michele Pavon

Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon. O ptimal transport in systems and control. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 4:89–113, 2021. 17W ord count: 11148. 38 SCHRÖDINGER BRIDGE PROBLEM FOR JUMP DIFFUSIONS

2021
[11]

Georgiou, and Michele Pavon

Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon. T he most likely evolution of diﬀusing and vanishing particles: Schrödinger bridges w ith unbalanced marginals. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 60(4):2016–2039, 2022

2016
[12]

Heat kernels for non- symmetric diﬀusion operators with jumps

Zhen-Qing Chen, Eryan Hu, Longjie Xie, and Xicheng Zhan g. Heat kernels for non- symmetric diﬀusion operators with jumps. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 263, 11 2016

2016
[13]

Perturbation by non- local operators

Zhen-Qing Chen and Jie-Ming Wang. Perturbation by non- local operators. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques, 54(2):606 – 639, 2018

2018
[14]

Heat kernels and anal yticity of non-symmetric jump diﬀusion semigroups

Zhen-Qing Chen and Xicheng Zhang. Heat kernels and anal yticity of non-symmetric jump diﬀusion semigroups. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 165:267–312, 2016

2016
[15]

Uniqueness of stable -like processes, 2016

Zhen-Qing Chen and Xicheng Zhang. Uniqueness of stable -like processes, 2016

2016
[16]

Heat kernels for non- symmetric non-local oper- ators

Zhen-Qing Chen and Xicheng Zhang. Heat kernels for non- symmetric non-local oper- ators. Recent developments in nonlocal theory, pages 24–51, 2018

2018
[17]

Chung and J.B

K.L. Chung and J.B. Walsh. Markov Processes, Brownian Motion, and Time Symmetry. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer New York, 2005

2005
[18]

A ﬁnite diﬀerence s cheme for option pricing in jump diﬀusion and exponential Lévy models

Rama Cont and Ekaterina Voltchkova. A ﬁnite diﬀerence s cheme for option pricing in jump diﬀusion and exponential Lévy models. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 43(4):1596–1626, 2005

2005
[19]

Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computa tion of optimal transport

Marco Cuturi. Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computa tion of optimal transport. Advances in neural information processing systems, 26, 2013

2013
[20]

A stochastic control approach to recipro cal diﬀusion processes

Paolo Dai Pra. A stochastic control approach to recipro cal diﬀusion processes. Applied mathematics and Optimization, 23(1):313–329, 1991

1991
[21]

Diﬀusion Schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based gener ative modeling

Valentin De Bortoli, James Thornton, Jeremy Heng, and A rnaud Doucet. Diﬀusion Schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based gener ative modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:17695–17709, 2021

2021
[22]

Conditional Brownian motion and the boun dary limits of harmonic functions

Joseph L Doob. Conditional Brownian motion and the boun dary limits of harmonic functions. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 85:431–458, 1957

1957
[23]

Classical potential theory and its probabilistic counterpart, volume

Joseph L Doob. Classical potential theory and its probabilistic counterpart, volume
[24]

Application of generalized hyperboli c Lévy motions to ﬁnance

Ernst Eberlein. Application of generalized hyperboli c Lévy motions to ﬁnance. In Lévy processes: theory and applications, pages 319–336. Springer, 2001

2001
[25]

Traversing the Schrö dinger bridge strait: Robert Fortet’s marvelous proof redux

Montacer Essid and Michele Pavon. Traversing the Schrö dinger bridge strait: Robert Fortet’s marvelous proof redux. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 181(1):23–60, 2019

2019
[26]

Random ﬁelds and diﬀusion processes

Hans Föllmer. Random ﬁelds and diﬀusion processes. Ecole d’Ete de Probabilites de Saint-Flour XV-XVII, 1985-87, 1988

1985
[27]

Entropy minimization an d Schrödinger processes in inﬁnite dimensions

Hans Föllmer and Nina Gantert. Entropy minimization an d Schrödinger processes in inﬁnite dimensions. The annals of probability, 25(2):901–926, 1997

1997
[28]

Heat kernel estimates and Harnack in equalities for some Dirichlet forms with non-local part

Mohammud Foondun. Heat kernel estimates and Harnack in equalities for some Dirichlet forms with non-local part. Electronic Journal of Probability, 14(none):314 – 340, 2009

2009
[29]

Résolution d’un système d’équations de M

Robert Fortet. Résolution d’un système d’équations de M. Schrödinger. J. Math. Pure Appl. IX, 1:83–105, 1940

1940
[30]

Heat kernels of non-symmetric Lévy-type operators

Tomasz Grzywny and Karol Szczypkowski. Heat kernels of non-symmetric Lévy-type operators. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 267(10):6004–6064, 2019

2019
[31]

Malliavin calcul us on the Wiener-Poisson space and its application to canonical SDE with jumps

Yasushi Ishikawa and Hiroshi Kunita. Malliavin calcul us on the Wiener-Poisson space and its application to canonical SDE with jumps. Stochastic processes and their applications, 116(12):1743–1769, 2006. SCHRÖDINGER BRIDGE PROBLEM FOR JUMP DIFFUSIONS 39

2006
[32]

Reciprocal processes

Benton Jamison. Reciprocal processes. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 30(1):65–86, 1974

1974
[33]

The Markov processes of Schrödinger

Benton Jamison. The Markov processes of Schrödinger. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete, 32(4):323–331, 1975

1975
[34]

Heat kernel estimates for non-symmetric stab le-like processes, 2017

Peng Jin. Heat kernel estimates for non-symmetric stab le-like processes, 2017

2017
[35]

Heat kern els of non-symmetric jump processes: beyond the stable case

Panki Kim, Renming Song, and Zoran Vondraček. Heat kern els of non-symmetric jump processes: beyond the stable case. Potential analysis, 49:37–90, 2018

2018
[36]

Markov processes associated with cer tain integro-diﬀerential opera- tors

Takashi Komatsu. Markov processes associated with cer tain integro-diﬀerential opera- tors. Osaka Journal of Mathematics, 10(2):271 – 303, 1973

1973
[37]

Jump-diﬀusion models for asset pricing in ﬁ nancial engineering

Steve G Kou. Jump-diﬀusion models for asset pricing in ﬁ nancial engineering. Handbooks in operations research and management science, 15:73–116, 2007

2007
[38]

Existence of (Markovian) solutions to martingale problems associated with Lévy-type operators

Franziska Kühn. Existence of (Markovian) solutions to martingale problems associated with Lévy-type operators. Electronic Journal of Probability, 25(none):1 – 26, 2020

2020
[39]

Analysis of nondegenerate Wiener-Poi sson functionals and its applica- tions to Itô’s SDE with jumps

Hiroshi Kunita. Analysis of nondegenerate Wiener-Poi sson functionals and its applica- tions to Itô’s SDE with jumps. Sankhya A, 73:1–45, 2011

2011
[40]

Nondegenerate SDE’s with jumps and the ir hypoelliptic properties

Hiroshi Kunita. Nondegenerate SDE’s with jumps and the ir hypoelliptic properties. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, 65(3):993–1035, 2013

2013
[41]

Stochastic Flows and Jump-Diﬀusions

Hiroshi Kunita. Stochastic Flows and Jump-Diﬀusions. Probability Theory and Sto- chastic Modelling. Springer Nature Singapore, 2019

2019
[42]

Equivalence of stochastic equations an d martingale problems

Thomas G Kurtz. Equivalence of stochastic equations an d martingale problems. Stochastic analysis 2010, pages 113–130, 2011

2010
[43]

A survey of the Schrödinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport, 2013

Christian Léonard. A survey of the Schrödinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport, 2013

2013
[44]

Some properties of path measures

Christian Léonard. Some properties of path measures. Séminaire de Probabilités XL VI, pages 207–230, 2014

2014
[45]

Problème des martin gales et équations diﬀéren- tielles stochastiques associées à un opérateur intégro-di ﬀérentiel

J-P Lepeltier and Bernard Marchal. Problème des martin gales et équations diﬀéren- tielles stochastiques associées à un opérateur intégro-di ﬀérentiel. In Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré. Section B. Calcul des probabilités et statistiques, volume 12, pages 43– 103, 1976

1976
[46]

Deep general- ized Schrödinger bridge

Guan-Horng Liu, Tianrong Chen, Oswin So, and Evangelos Theodorou. Deep general- ized Schrödinger bridge. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:9374– 9388, 2022

2022
[47]

Density and gradient esti- mates for non degenerate brownian sdes with unbounded measu rable drift

Stéphane Menozzi, Antonello Pesce, and Xicheng Zhang. Density and gradient esti- mates for non degenerate brownian sdes with unbounded measu rable drift. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 272:330–369, 2021

2021
[48]

A Martingale approach to optimal portfolios with jump-diﬀusions and benchmarks

Daniel Michelbrink. A Martingale approach to optimal portfolios with jump-diﬀusions and benchmarks. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, 2012

2012
[49]

Monge’s problem with a quadratic cost by the zero-noise limit of h-path processes

Toshio Mikami. Monge’s problem with a quadratic cost by the zero-noise limit of h-path processes. Probability theory and related ﬁelds, 129(2):245–260, 2004

2004
[50]

Transformations of diﬀusion and Schrö dinger processes

Masao Nagasawa. Transformations of diﬀusion and Schrö dinger processes. Probability theory and related ﬁelds, 82(1):109–136, 1989

1989
[51]

Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diﬀusions

Bernt Øksendal and Agnès Sulem. Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diﬀusions. Springer, Universitext, 2019. 3rd edition

2019
[52]

Michele Pavon, Giulio Trigila, and Esteban G. Tabak. Th e data-driven Schrödinger bridge. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 74(7):1545–1573, 2021

2021
[53]

Diﬀusions, Markov processes, and martingales: Volume 1, foundations

Leonard CG Rogers and David Williams. Diﬀusions, Markov processes, and martingales: Volume 1, foundations. Cambridge university press, 2000. 40 SCHRÖDINGER BRIDGE PROBLEM FOR JUMP DIFFUSIONS

2000
[54]

Diﬀusions, Markov processes, and martingales: Volume 2, Itô calculus

Leonard CG Rogers and David Williams. Diﬀusions, Markov processes, and martingales: Volume 2, Itô calculus. Cambridge university press, 2000

2000
[55]

On the probability of large dev iations of random variables

Ivan Nicolaevich Sanov. On the probability of large dev iations of random variables. Selected Translations in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1:213–244, 1961

1961
[56]

Lévy processes in ﬁnance: pricing ﬁnancial derivatives

Wim Schoutens. Lévy processes in ﬁnance: pricing ﬁnancial derivatives. Wiley Online Library, 2003

2003
[57]

Über die umkehrung der naturgesetze

Erwin Schrödinger. Über die umkehrung der naturgesetze. Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, physikalisch- mathematische Klasse, 8, 1931

1931
[58]

Sur la théorie relativiste de l’éle ctron et l’interprétation de la mécanique quantique

Erwin Schrödinger. Sur la théorie relativiste de l’éle ctron et l’interprétation de la mécanique quantique. In Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré, volume 2, pages 269– 310, 1932

1932
[59]

Diﬀusion Schrödinger bridge matching

Yuyang Shi, Valentin De Bortoli, Andrew Campbell, and A rnaud Doucet. Diﬀusion Schrödinger bridge matching. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

2024
[60]

Concerning nonnegati ve matrices and doubly sto- chastic matrices

Richard Sinkhorn and Paul Knopp. Concerning nonnegati ve matrices and doubly sto- chastic matrices. Paciﬁc Journal of Mathematics, 21(2):343–348, 1967

1967
[61]

Diﬀusion processes associated with L évy generators

Daniel W Stroock. Diﬀusion processes associated with L évy generators. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 32(3):209–244, 1975

1975
[62]

Multidimensional diﬀusion processes, volume 233

Daniel W Stroock and SR Srinivasa Varadhan. Multidimensional diﬀusion processes, volume 233. Springer Science & Business Media, 1997

1997
[63]

Theoretical guarante es for sampling and inference in generative models with latent diﬀusions

Belinda Tzen and Maxim Raginsky. Theoretical guarante es for sampling and inference in generative models with latent diﬀusions. In Conference on Learning Theory, pages 3084–3114. PMLR, 2019

2019
[64]

Solving Schrödinger bridges via maximum likelihood

Francisco Vargas, Pierre Thodoroﬀ, Austen Lamacraft, and Neil Lawrence. Solving Schrödinger bridges via maximum likelihood. Entropy, 23(9):1134, 2021

2021
[65]

Schrödinger bridges from 1931 to 19 91

A Wakolbinger et al. Schrödinger bridges from 1931 to 19 91. In Proc. of the 4th Latin American Congress in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Mexico City, pages 61–79, 1990

1931
[66]

Deep generative learning via Schrödinger bridge

Gefei Wang, Yuling Jiao, Qian Xu, Yang Wang, and Can Yang . Deep generative learning via Schrödinger bridge. In International conference on machine learning, pages 10794– 10804. PMLR, 2021

2021
[67]

Zeitouni and A Dembo

O. Zeitouni and A Dembo. Large deviations techniques an d applications. Applications of Mathematics, 38, 1998

1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus

David Applebaum. Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2 editi on, 2009

work page 2009

[2] [2]

Regularity results for stable-like oper ators

Richard F Bass. Regularity results for stable-like oper ators. Journal of Functional Analysis, 257(8):2693–2722, 2009

work page 2009

[3] [3]

An automorphism of product measures

Arne Beurling. An automorphism of product measures. Annals of Mathematics, pages 189–200, 1960

work page 1960

[4] [4]

Hughston, Sebastian Jaimunga l, and Leandro Sánchez- Betancourt

George Bouzianis, Lane P. Hughston, Sebastian Jaimunga l, and Leandro Sánchez- Betancourt. Lévy-Ito models in ﬁnance. Probability Surveys, 18(none):132 – 178, 2021

work page 2021

[5] [5]

The Schrödinger bridge between Gaussian measures has a closed form, 2023

Charlotte Bunne, Ya-Ping Hsieh, Marco Cuturi, and Andre as Krause. The Schrödinger bridge between Gaussian measures has a closed form, 2023

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Smooth densities for solutions to stochast ic diﬀerential equations with jumps

Thomas Cass. Smooth densities for solutions to stochast ic diﬀerential equations with jumps. Stochastic processes and their applications, 119(5):1416–1435, 2009

work page 2009

[7] [7]

Periodic homogeniza- tion of nonsymmetric Lévy-type processes

Xin Chen, Zhen-Qing Chen, Takashi Kumagai, and Jian Wang . Periodic homogeniza- tion of nonsymmetric Lévy-type processes. The Annals of Probability, 49(6):2874–2921, 2021

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Heat kernel for n on-local operators with variable order

Xin Chen, Zhen-Qing Chen, and Jian Wang. Heat kernel for n on-local operators with variable order. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 130(6):3574–3647, 2020

work page 2020