Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Combining Genre Classification and Harmonic-Percussive Features with Diffusion Models for Music-Video Generation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-stage diffusion pipeline generates music videos by first captioning and genre-labelling the audio, then interpolating frames along an audio energy vector built from percussive and harmonic components.

desk verdict Plausible pipeline, but the headline AVS gain is not yet evidenced: the metric is unvalidated, likely circular, and the numbers come from single runs with no statistics. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05694 v1 pith:CX6E4MJA submitted 2024-12-07 cs.MM cs.GRcs.SDeess.AS

Leonardo Pina , Yongmin Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.MMcs.GRcs.SDeess.AS
keywords diffusionmodelmusicvideogenerationcaptioninggenreclassificationharmonic-percussiveseparationaudio-visualsynchronyframeinterpolation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that music videos can be generated automatically from a song plus one user-chosen artwork image, with the visual changes plausibly locked to musical events. It argues that a two-stage pipeline—image generation guided by music captions and genre-based artistic style, followed by frame interpolation driven by an audio energy vector—produces better audio-visual synchronisation than simple linear interpolation. The authors introduce a new quantitative metric, Audio-Visual Synchrony (AVS), and report that videos made with their energy-vector method score substantially higher on it across classical, electronic, country, rock, and jazz examples.

What carries the argument

The audio energy vector is the central mechanism: a cumulative, normalised curve derived from a weighted combination of percussive and harmonic components of the audio (weights 0.9 and 0.1), computed via a Mel-scaled spectrogram. It acts as a one-dimensional control signal that maps the 0-to-1 range of a slerp between two latent images, so frame positions in the video correspond to musical energy milestones. The genre dictionary—23 hand-written style descriptions keyed to genre labels—is the other load-bearing component, translating music-caption text into a stable artistic prompt for the Kandinsky diffusion model.

What would settle it

A controlled perception study where listeners rate the synchronisation of the proposed videos against linear-interpolation videos (and against beat-synced baselines) would settle the claim: if human ratings do not reproduce the AVS ordering, the metric is not a faithful proxy for synchrony. A simpler check is to feed a shuffled or reversed audio energy vector into the pipeline and see whether AVS stays high despite obviously wrong sync.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that controlling diffusion-model frame interpolation with an audio energy vector, rather than linearly interpolating latent codes, makes the resulting music visualiser visibly change in step with the music. The energy vector is built by decomposing the audio into harmonic and percussive time series, weighting them (0.9 percussive, 0.1 harmonic), forming a Mel-scaled spectrogram, and taking the cumulative sum of the audio energy. That cumulative curve drives a spherical linear interpolation (slerp) between the latent encodings of consecutive key images, and the diffusion model decodes each interpolated latent into a frame. Reported AVS values are 0.744, 0.738, 0.631, 0.645, and 0.748 for classical, electronic, country, rock, and jazz, against 0.429, 0.501, 0.510, 0.373, and 0.311 for linear interpolation, which the paper interprets as significantly better synchronisation.

Load-bearing premise

The whole quantitative comparison rests on the assumption that the AVS metric actually measures perceived synchronisation, but its thresholds, penalty, and DTW alignment were never checked against human judgments, and the same audio-energy representation drives both the generation and the metric.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the AVS results hold, the same pipeline could turn any song and seed artwork into a synced visualiser without manual editing, lowering the production cost for independent artists and live events.
  • The success of weighted percussive and harmonic components suggests that sharper musical transients, not just tempo or beats, should be the primary driver of visual rhythm in generative music video systems.
  • The genre-to-artistic-style dictionary offers a simple, user-controllable way to steer diffusion image generation, which could be reused in other music-to-visual applications.
  • Because the metric and the generation both rely on the same audio-energy representation, the paper implies that synchronisation quality can be optimised directly against a computable objective rather than human judgment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The AVS metric's thresholds and penalty weights are tunable and were not validated against human perception; a perceptual listening-viewing study would be needed to confirm that higher AVS values correspond to what audiences experience as better sync.
  • The same audio-energy-vector idea could be tested on other generative video backbones, such as text-to-video diffusion models, to see whether the improvement over linear interpolation carries over beyond the specific Stable Diffusion Image Variations model used here.
  • A natural extension is to derive the energy vector from more musical features than just harmonic and percussive components—for example, onset strength or beat-phase—and compare which control signal yields the most perceptible synchrony.
  • The genre dictionary could be learned from data instead of hand-written, potentially improving coverage for genres outside the current 23 labels and making the image style guidance more robust to captioning errors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a two-stage pipeline for generating music visualizers from a user-selected artwork image and a music sample. In the first stage, LP-MusicCaps produces text captions for 10-second music segments, a text classifier maps each caption to one of 23 predefined genres, and a hand-authored genre-to-art-style dictionary (Table 2) supplies a style prompt; a Kandinsky-based diffusion model then generates an image per segment from the style prompt and the user's seed image. In the second stage, librosa decomposes the audio into harmonic and percussive components, a weighted cumulative energy vector is built (weights 0.9 percussive, 0.1 harmonic in the example), and this vector controls the slerp interpolation between latent encodings of successive segment images, which are decoded by a Stable Diffusion Image Variations model to produce frames. The paper introduces a new Audio-Visual Synchrony (AVS) metric based on onset-strength timestamps, frame-difference timestamps, a slope-based exponential penalty, and FastDTW, and reports in Table 3 that videos generated with the proposed energy-vector interpolation achieve higher AVS values than linear interpolation for classical, electronic, country, rock, and jazz examples. The central quantitative claim is that this difference is 'significant' and indicates better audio-visual synchronization.

Significance. If the quantitative claim were established, the paper would offer a practically useful, user-controllable pipeline for music visualizer generation and a new evaluation metric for audio-visual synchronization. The authors deserve credit for a transparent system description, shared example results and code on GitHub, and qualitative demonstrations that the genre-dependent style prompts appear to influence the generated imagery (Figures 4 and 5). However, the paper's main evidence, the AVS gap in Table 3, is not yet convincing: the metric is introduced ad hoc, its thresholds are undisclosed, it is not validated against human perception, and the control signal driving the video interpolation is the same audio energy signal used by the metric's audio-side onset detection. The qualitative material is suggestive but does not by itself support the abstract's claim of significantly higher synchronization.

major comments (3)
  1. [4.2, Table 3; 3.3] The reported AVS advantage is confounded by construction. In Section 3.3, the interpolation progress between segment images is defined as the cumulative sum of percussive/harmonic audio energy, so stronger audio energy produces faster visual change. In Section 4.2, the AVS metric detects audio 'significant beats' from the onset strength of the same audio signal and detects visual transitions from frame differences. The video-side timestamps are therefore produced by the same control signal that the metric's audio-side detector measures, and a FastDTW alignment between these two timestamp sequences can be high even if a viewer perceives no synchronization. The authors should add a control experiment in which the visual transitions are generated by an independent signal, and should show that AVS scores correlate with human judgments.
  2. [4.2] The AVS metric is not validated and is not reproducible as reported. The metric relies on an audio onset threshold and a video frame-difference threshold, both described as 'it can be edited', plus a slope-based penalty with an exponential scaling factor, yet none of the actual threshold values, the scaling factor, or the minimum interval between detected transitions is reported. Because all of these parameters affect the final score, Table 3 cannot be independently reproduced or interpreted. The paper needs to disclose all parameters, calibrate the metric against human annotations or an existing synchronization benchmark, and show that the scores are stable under reasonable parameter variations.
  3. [Table 3; Section 4.2] The phrase 'significantly higher' is not supported by any statistical evidence. Table 3 reports a single AVS value per genre per method, with no repeated runs, no variance estimates, and no significance test, so the observed differences could be within run-to-run variation. The authors should generate several videos per condition (e.g., different seeds or different music segments), report means and confidence intervals, and apply an appropriate paired statistical test. In addition, the comparison includes only a linear-interpolation baseline; no comparison is made to existing audio-aligned video synthesis methods such as AADiff [28], which is cited but not evaluated. A human perceptual study would substantially strengthen the claim that the proposed method improves perceived synchronization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is typeset incorrectly as 'd(p, q) = p (p − q)2'; it should be the Euclidean distance, d(p,q) = sqrt((p−q)^2), and 'Euclidian' should be 'Euclidean'.
  2. [Figure 2] The text in Section 3.3 says the harmonic and percussive components are shown in Figure 2 (a) and (b) respectively, but the figure caption says '(a) percussive and (b) harmonic'; the order should be made consistent.
  3. [3.1] There is a typo in 'Built on the the GPT-3.5 Turbo LLM model' where 'the' is repeated.
  4. [3.4] The notation 'V AE' appears with an extra space and should be 'VAE'; similarly 'A VS' is frequently written with a space and should be 'AVS' throughout.
  5. [Tables 1 and 2] The captions contain 'T able' instead of 'Table'; please fix these typographical errors.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The quantitative advantage claimed in Table 3 rests on an unvalidated AVS metric whose audio reference stems from the same audio-energy content used to drive the video interpolation; this makes the high AVS scores partially self-confirming, though not a fully formal circularity.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.3 (Audio Energy Vectors) and Section 4.2 (Quantitative Evaluation, AVS metric)]
    "The cumulative audio energy vector is then used as a guide to smoothly interpolate between two images (latent vectors), resulting in the intermediate frames. In other words, value 0 in the cumulative sum represents the first frame, 1 the final frame, and others the frame transitions generated from the interpolation of the initial image to the final image."

    The AVS metric in Sec. 4.2 builds its audio-side reference from onset strength of the same music ('we first detect the significant beats existent in the audio sample by extracting the onset strength with the help of a threshold value (it can be edited) and then store the timestamps'), and its video-side reference from frame-difference peaks, then DTW-aligns the two timestamp vectors. But the frames being evaluated were generated by an interpolation whose progress variable is the cumulative audio energy vector of that same audio. Strong DTW alignment is therefore largely built into the experimental condition: the visual changes are produced by, and tightly correlated with, the very audio-derived signal that the metric uses as ground truth.

full rationale

The generative pipeline itself is a self-contained engineering composition of external tools (LP-MusicCaps, Kandinsky, Stable Diffusion Image Variations, librosa, ffmpeg) and does not rely on any load-bearing self-citation chain; no self-citation is central to the claimed derivation. The only significant circularity concern is the evaluation step. The authors introduce AVS in the same paper, explicitly state 'we do not have any ground-truth video examples or other comparison method', leave key thresholds 'editable' without reporting their values, and score a video whose frame-transition timing is controlled by the cumulative audio energy vector against an audio-onset signal derived from the same musical content. This makes the high AVS values partly a construction artifact: the metric rewards exactly the kind of alignment the control signal was designed to create. It is not a complete formal identity because the synthesis uses cumulative energy while the metric uses onset strength, and the comparison to linear interpolation is an appropriate algorithmic control; but the lack of perceptual validation or fixed thresholds means the reported 'significantly higher' AVS numbers do not independently establish better audio-visual synchronization. I therefore assign 5 rather than a higher score: the central quantitative claim is partially self-referential, yet the underlying method retains independent content and qualitative plausibility.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central pipeline relies on several hand-set parameters and unvalidated domain assumptions. The numeric weights in the energy vector and the text/image weights are chosen without sensitivity analysis; the AVS metric thresholds and penalty factors are not reported; and the genre-to-style mappings and metric validity are asserted rather than demonstrated.

free parameters (7)
  • Percussive/harmonic energy weighting = 0.9 percussive, 0.1 harmonic
    Used to compute the audio energy vector that drives frame interpolation (Section 3.3); values chosen by hand with no sensitivity analysis.
  • Kandinsky text/image input weights = text 0.30, image 0.70
    The text weight is lowered to 0.30 to mitigate caption errors, with image weight 0.70 (Section 4.3); chosen empirically for the presented examples.
  • Audio onset detection threshold = unspecified, editable
    Threshold on onset strength used in the AVS metric to select significant beats (Section 4.2); the actual value is not reported.
  • Video transition detection threshold = unspecified, editable
    Threshold on frame-difference values to select major visual transitions in the AVS metric (Section 4.2); the actual value is not reported.
  • Slope penalty scaling factor = unspecified
    Exponential scaling factor that normalizes the DTW cost into a 0 to 1 AVS score (Section 4.2); the value is not reported.
  • Minimum interval between detected transitions = unspecified
    Parameter to prevent too many transition detections in a short period during AVS calculation (Section 4.2); the value is not reported.
  • Music segment length = 10 seconds
    Segmentation length for captioning and image generation (Section 3.1); a design choice that affects the number and timing of generated images.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LP-MusicCaps captions are accurate enough that a simple text classifier can assign the correct genre.
    The genre classification feeds the art-style description that guides image generation (Sections 3.1-3.2); the paper itself notes caption inaccuracies (Section 4.3).
  • ad hoc to paper The hand-authored genre-to-art-style descriptions in Table 2 capture a useful relation between music genres and visual styles.
    The descriptions are created by the authors with no validation; they are the main driver of visual variation across genres (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption Cumulative weighted harmonic-percussive energy is a suitable control signal for perceived audio-visual synchronization.
    The entire frame-interpolation schedule is a monotone function of this vector (Section 3.3); no perceptual validation is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper FastDTW distance between onset timestamps and visual-transition timestamps, after a slope-based penalty, measures human-perceived synchronization.
    The AVS metric in Section 4.2 is defined by the authors and is not validated against human ratings or existing benchmarks.
  • domain assumption The diffusion models (Kandinsky, Stable Diffusion Image Variations) produce frames whose latent-space interpolation yields coherent visual transitions.
    Video quality and temporal coherence are taken as given from the pre-trained models (Sections 3.3-3.4); the paper reports only qualitative observations.
invented entities (1)
  • Audio-Visual Synchrony (AVS) metric
    purpose: Quantify synchronization between audio onsets and visual transitions in generated videos.
    No validation against human perception or external benchmarks; thresholds and penalty scaling are hand-set (Section 4.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Combining Genre Classification and Harmonic-Percussive Features with Diffusion Models for Music-Video Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CX6E4MJA

@misc{pith2026241205694,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Combining Genre Classification and Harmonic-Percussive Features with Diffusion Models for Music-Video Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CX6E4MJA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05694}
}
read the original abstract

This study presents a novel method for generating music visualisers using diffusion models, combining audio input with user-selected artwork. The process involves two main stages: image generation and video creation. First, music captioning and genre classification are performed, followed by the retrieval of artistic style descriptions. A diffusion model then generates images based on the user's input image and the derived artistic style descriptions. The video generation stage utilises the same diffusion model to interpolate frames, controlled by audio energy vectors derived from key musical features of harmonics and percussives. The method demonstrates promising results across various genres, and a new metric, Audio-Visual Synchrony (AVS), is introduced to quantitatively evaluate the synchronisation between visual and audio elements. Comparative analysis shows significantly higher AVS values for videos generated using the proposed method with audio energy vectors, compared to linear interpolation. This approach has potential applications in diverse fields, including independent music video creation, film production, live music events, and enhancing audio-visual experiences in public spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04001 (2023)

    Lee, S., Kong, C., Jeon, D., Kwak, N.: Aadiff: Audio-aligned video synthesis with text-to-image diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04001 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Wu, X., Qiao, Y., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Cross matching of music and image. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 837–840 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [2]

    Master’s thesis, Mississippi College (2018)

    Ward, T.: Aesthetics of sound: The relationship between music and its artwork. Master’s thesis, Mississippi College (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    In: 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo

    Xu, L.-Q., Li, Y.: Video classification using spatial-temporal features and pca. In: 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME’03. Proceedings, vol. 3, p. 485 (2003). IEEE

    work page 2003

  5. [4]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol

    Li, Y., Gong, S., Liddell, H.: Constructing facial identity surfaces in a nonlin- ear discriminating space. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 258–263 (2001). IEEE

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    In: The Second International Workshop on Recognition, Analysis, and Tracking of Faces and Gestures in Real-Time Systems, pp

    Li, Y., Gong, S., Liddell, H.: Video-based online face recognition using identity surfaces. In: The Second International Workshop on Recognition, Analysis, and Tracking of Faces and Gestures in Real-Time Systems, pp. 40–46 (2001). IEEE

    work page 2001

  7. [6]

    In: KES’2000

    Li, Y., Gong, S., Sherrah, J., Liddell, H.: Multi-view face detection using support vector machines and eigenspace modelling. In: KES’2000. Fourth International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems and Allied Technologies. Proceedings (Cat. No. 00TH8516), vol. 1, pp. 241–244 (2000). IEEE

    work page 2000

  8. [7]

    Image and Vision Computing 21(13-14), 1077–1086 (2003) 19

    Li, Y., Gong, S., Liddell, H.: Recognising trajectories of facial identities using kernel discriminant analysis. Image and Vision Computing 21(13-14), 1077–1086 (2003) 19

    work page 2003

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    International Journal of Computer Vision 53, 71–92 (2003)

    Li, Y., Gong, S., Liddell, H.: Constructing facial identity surfaces for recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision 53, 71–92 (2003)

    2003

  2. [9]

    ACM (2023)

    Williams, A., Lattner, S., Barthet, M., et al.: Sound-and-image-informed music artwork generation using text-to-image models. ACM (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Lee, C.-C., Lin, W.-Y., Shih, Y.-T., Kuo, P.-Y., Su, L.: Crossing you in style: Cross-modal style transfer from music to visual arts. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 3219–3227 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp

    Qiu, Y., Kataoka, H.: Image generation associated with music data. In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 2510–2513 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Wu, X., Xu, B., Qiao, Y., Tang, X.: Automatic music video generation: cross matching of music and image. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1381–1382 (2012)

    2012

  6. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Lin, J.-C., Wei, W.-L., Yang, J., Wang, H.-M., Liao, H.-Y.M.: Automatic music video generation based on simultaneous soundtrack recommendation and video editing. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 519–527 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence45(9), 10850–10869 (2023)

    Croitoru, F.-A., Hondru, V., Ionescu, R.T., Shah, M.: Diffusion models in vision: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence45(9), 10850–10869 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    In: Ranzato, M., Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P.S., Wortman Vaughan, J

    Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A.: Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. In: Ranzato, M., Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P.S., Wortman Vaughan, J. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794. Curran Associates, Inc., ??? (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10684–10695 (2022)

    2022

  10. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 1(2), 3 (2022)

    Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., Chen, M.: Hierarchical text- conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 1(2), 3 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07909 (2023)

    Zhang, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, M., Kweon, I.S.: Text-to-image diffusion models in generative ai: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07909 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning, 20 pp

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, 20 pp. 8748–8763 (2021). PMLR

    2021

  13. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.00386 (2022)

    Wang, Z., Liu, W., He, Q., Wu, X., Yi, Z.: Clip-gen: Language-free training of a text-to-image generator with clip. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.00386 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03502 (2023)

    Razzhigaev, A., Shakhmatov, A., Maltseva, A., Arkhipkin, V., Pavlov, I., Ryabov, I., Kuts, A., Panchenko, A., Kuznetsov, A., Dimitrov, D.: Kandinsky: an improved text-to-image synthesis with image prior and latent diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03502 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Xu, X., Guo, J., Wang, Z., Huang, G., Essa, I., Shi, H.: Prompt-free diffu- sion: Taking ”text” out of text-to-image diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8682–8692 (2024)

    2024

  16. [23]

    Hugging Face

    Pinkney, J.: Stable Diffusion Image Variations. Hugging Face. Available at: https://huggingface.co/lambdalabs/sd-image-variations-diffusers (Accessed: 7 August 2024) (2022)

    2022

  17. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10647 (2023)

    Xing, Z., Feng, Q., Chen, H., Dai, Q., Hu, H., Xu, H., Wu, Z., Jiang, Y.-G.: A survey on video diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10647 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol

    Ho, J., Salimans, T., Gritsenko, A., Chan, W., Norouzi, M., Fleet, D.J.: Video diffusion models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 35, pp. 8633–8646 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303 (2022)

    Ho, J., Chan, W., Saharia, C., Whang, J., Gao, R., Gritsenko, A., Kingma, D.P., Poole, B., Norouzi, M., Fleet, D.J., Salimans, T.: Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  20. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

    Hua, X.-S., Lu, L., Zhang, H.-J.: Automatic music video generation based on temporal pattern analysis. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 472–475 (2004)

    2004

  21. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06654 (2019)

    Pons, J., Serra, X.: musicnn: Pre-trained convolutional neural networks for music audio tagging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06654 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp

    Manco, I., Benetos, E., Quinton, E., Fazekas, G.: Muscaps: Generating captions for music audio. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8 (2021). IEEE

    2021

  23. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp

    Guzhov, A., Raue, F., Hees, J., Dengel, A.: Audioclip: Extending clip to image, text and audio. In: Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 976–980 (2022). IEEE 21

    2022

  24. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16372 (2023)

    Doh, S., Choi, K., Lee, J., Nam, J.: Lp-musiccaps: Llm-based pseudo music captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16372 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08730 (2023)

    Deng, Z., Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Guo, R., Zhang, G., Chen, W., Huang, W., Benetos, E.: Musilingo: Bridging music and text with pre-trained language models for music captioning and query response. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08730 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol

    Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al.: Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 35, pp. 27730–27744 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol

    Zheng, C., Vuong, T.-L., Cai, J., Phung, D.: Movq: Modulating quantized vectors for high-fidelity image generation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 35, pp. 23412–23425 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Raw, N.: Creating AI Music Videos with Stable Diffusion. AI Art. https://aiart. dev/posts/sd-music-videos/sd music videos.html Accessed 2024-08-06

    2024

  29. [37]

    US Patent App

    Xu, L.-Q., Li, Y.: Method and system for classification of semantic content of audio/video data. US Patent App. 10/521,732 (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    PhD thesis, Queen Mary, University of London (2001)

    Li, Y.: Dynamic face models: construction and applications. PhD thesis, Queen Mary, University of London (2001)

    2001

  31. [39]

    GitHub repository

    Kroening, K.: ffmpeg-python. GitHub repository. Available at: https://github.com/kkroening/ffmpeg-python (Accessed: 27 August 2024) (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 26(1), 43–49 (1978)

    Sakoe, H., Chiba, S.: Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 26(1), 43–49 (1978)

    1978

  33. [41]

    Revista Informatic˘ a Economic˘ a2(46), 94 (2008)

    Furtun˘ a, T.F.: Dynamic programming algorithms in speech recognition. Revista Informatic˘ a Economic˘ a2(46), 94 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Intelligent Data Analysis 11(5), 561–580 (2007) 22

    Salvador, S., Chan, P.: Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space. Intelligent Data Analysis 11(5), 561–580 (2007) 22

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.