Pith. sign in

REVIEW 22 cited by

Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.09078 v5 pith:X2GTUOMR submitted 2024-12-12 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoningcomplexforest-of-thoughtproblemsstrategiesaccuracydecision-makingefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities across various language tasks, but solving complex reasoning problems remains a significant challenge. While existing methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Tree-of-Thought (ToT), enhance reasoning by decomposing problems or structuring prompts, they typically perform a single pass of reasoning and may fail to revisit flawed paths, compromising accuracy. To address this limitation, we propose a novel reasoning framework called Forest-of-Thought (FoT), which integrates multiple reasoning trees to leverage collective decision-making for solving complex logical problems. FoT employs sparse activation strategies to select the most relevant reasoning paths, improving both efficiency and accuracy. Additionally, we introduce a dynamic self-correction strategy that enables real-time error correction, along with consensus-guided decision-making strategies to optimize both correctness and computational resources. Experimental results demonstrate that the FoT framework, combined with these strategies, significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, enabling them to solve complex tasks with greater precision and efficiency. Code will be available at https://github.com/iamhankai/Forest-of-Thought.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Subspace Networks: Scaling Decentralized Training with Communication-Efficient Model Parallelism

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Constraining transformer projection weights to a shared low-rank subspace reportedly enables near-lossless compression of pipeline-parallel communication, matching centralized convergence at 80Mbps bandwidth.

  2. Stepwise Reasoning Checkpoint Analysis: A Test Time Scaling Method to Enhance LLMs' Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A checkpoint-based search and candidate augmentation method improves small LLM mathematical reasoning accuracy over existing test-time scaling baselines.

  3. When to Vote, When to Rewrite: Disagreement-Guided Strategy Routing for Test-Time Scaling

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A disagreement-guided routing framework dynamically selects among resolution, voting, and rewriting strategies for test-time scaling, delivering 3-7% accuracy gains with lower sampling cost on mathematical benchmarks.

  4. Framework of Thoughts: A Foundation Framework for Dynamic and Optimized Reasoning based on Chains, Trees, and Graphs

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A framework that wraps chain/tree/graph reasoning schemes with parallel execution, caching, and hyperparameter/prompt optimization, reporting 1.9–35× speedups and modest accuracy gains.

  5. CLEANER: Self-Purified Trajectories Boost Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Replacing execution-error segments in RL trajectories with the model's own successful self-corrections improves accuracy on math and code benchmarks while cutting training steps by roughly two-thirds.

  6. Re-FORC: Adaptive Reward Prediction for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Re-FORC learns to forecast reward-versus-thinking-token curves and uses them in a Gittins-style policy, saving ~26% compute at matched accuracy and improving accuracy at matched compute on five math benchmarks.

  7. Bottom-up Domain-specific Superintelligence: A Reliable Knowledge Graph is What We Need

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A language model fine-tuned on knowledge-graph-path reasoning tasks (QwQ-Med-3) beats strong baselines on a same-style benchmark but shows mixed gains on external medical QA tests.

  8. DenseWorld-1M: Towards Detailed Dense Grounded Caption in the Real World

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DenseWorld-1M provides one million images with detailed object captions, pixel masks, and spatial relations by chaining SAM, APE, RAM++, and VLMs through a three-stage labeling pipeline.

  9. LLM-First Search: Self-Guided Exploration of the Solution Space

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-First Search, where the model itself decides whether to continue or backtrack during reasoning, outperforms MCTS, BestFS, and ToT-BFS on harder Countdown and Sudoku tasks while using fewer tokens.

  10. Structured Pruning for Diverse Best-of-N Reasoning Optimization

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    SPRINT learns to select which attention heads to prune per question, improving Pass@N over random head selection and multinomial sampling on MATH500 and GSM8K.

  11. MARCO: Meta-Reflection with Cross-Referencing for Code Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MARCO combines cross-problem knowledge accumulation with cross-agent lesson sharing to improve LLM code reasoning at inference time.

  12. Typhoon T1: An Open Thai Reasoning Model

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Structured long-thinking SFT turns a 3B Thai instruct model into a reasoning model that improves on several English benchmarks and can think in Thai, with a fully open recipe.

  13. GroupRAG: Cognitively Inspired Group-Aware Retrieval and Reasoning via Knowledge-Driven Problem Structuring

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Structuring questions into knowledge-driven keypoint groups before retrieval and reasoning improves small-model accuracy on MedQA.

  14. Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SRGen improves LLM math reasoning by detecting high-entropy tokens and injecting a small corrected vector into the hidden state at those points during decoding, without training.

  15. CyberV: Cybernetics for Test-time Scaling in Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-free test-time feedback loop, using attention drift to select key frames, improves video MLLM accuracy, with the largest gains on knowledge-heavy VideoMMMU.

  16. Revisiting Test-Time Scaling: A Survey and a Diversity-Aware Method for Efficient Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ADAPT, a diversity-aware prefix fine-tuning method, improves best-of-N sampling efficiency for a 1.5B reasoning model, reaching 80% accuracy at N=32 versus N=256 for the baseline.

  17. Think Again! The Effect of Test-Time Compute on Preferences, Opinions, and Beliefs of Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark (POBs) reveals that LLMs lean progressive-collectivist, that test-time compute offers limited gains in neutrality or consistency, and that newer model versions often become more biased and less consistent.

  18. Enhancing SLMs for Sustainable Code Optimization in Radio-Astronomy

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A 7-billion-parameter coding model with multi-sampling matches a 32-billion-parameter model on repository-level completion under the same time budget, and compiler-error feedback improves pass rates across all models tested.

  19. From Implicit Exploration to Structured Reasoning: Leveraging Guideline and Refinement for LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A guideline-and-refinement prompting framework distills reasoning rules from past successes and failures, applies them stepwise with per-step correction, and reports gains over CoT, ReAct, ToT, Beats, and FoT on selec...

  20. AutoChemSchematic AI: Agentic Physics-Aware Automation for Chemical Manufacturing Scale-Up

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The framework trains small models on synthetic AI-generated data to produce PFD/PID text, then validates two examples by manual DWSIM setup, leaving the industrial-viability claim unproven.

  21. ThinkLess: A Training-Free Inference-Efficient Method for Reducing Reasoning Redundancy

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Skipping explicit chain-of-thought reasoning entirely, and prompting for a formatted answer, matches full CoT accuracy on several benchmarks while cutting latency and token counts.

  22. A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    Recent advances in LLM mathematical reasoning are organized into comprehension and generation phases, covering methods from prompting to test-time scaling.

Pith tools