Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Complexity Dynamics of Grokking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.09810 v2 pith:CMOVZH4P submitted 2024-12-13 cs.LG

The Complexity Dynamics of Grokking

classification cs.LG
keywords complexitynetworksphasetransitioncompressiongeneralizationmemorizationdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We demonstrate the existence of a complexity phase transition in neural networks by studying the grokking phenomenon, where networks suddenly transition from memorization to generalization long after overfitting their training data. To characterize this phase transition, we introduce a theoretical framework for measuring complexity based on rate-distortion theory and Kolmogorov complexity, which can be understood as principled lossy compression for networks. We find that properly regularized networks exhibit a sharp phase transition: complexity rises during memorization, then falls as the network discovers a simpler underlying pattern that generalizes. In contrast, unregularized networks remain trapped in a high-complexity memorization phase. We establish an explicit connection between our complexity measure and generalization bounds, providing a theoretical foundation for the link between lossy compression and generalization. Our framework achieves compression ratios 30-40x better than na\"ive approaches, enabling precise tracking of complexity dynamics. Finally, we introduce a regularization method based on spectral entropy that encourages networks toward low-complexity representations by penalizing their intrinsic dimension.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example

    cs.LG 2025-04 accept novelty 7.0

    One training example via RLVR boosts LLM math reasoning from 17.6% to 35.7% average across six benchmarks.

  2. At-Grok Is Not Converged:A Measurement-Validity Audit for Grokking Representation Metrics

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    Embedding effective rank at grokking is a transient that overstates the converged floor by 3–5× (MLP) / 1.3–1.5× (transformer), and compression lags generalization by order T_grok, modulated by LayerNorm.

  3. Model Capacity Determines Grokking through Competing Memorisation and Generalisation Speeds

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Grokking emerges near the model size where memorization timescale T_mem(P) intersects generalization timescale T_gen(P) on modular arithmetic.