Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Grams: Gradient Descent with Adaptive Momentum Scaling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.17107 v3 pith:G2G67WK2 submitted 2024-12-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DSmath.OC

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.DSmath.OC
keywords gramsmathbfoptimizersdescentmomentumadaptiveapproachcautious
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We introduce $\mathbf{G}$radient Descent with $\mathbf{A}$daptive $\mathbf{M}$omentum $\mathbf{S}$caling ($\mathbf{Grams}$), a novel optimization algorithm that decouples the direction and magnitude of parameter updates in deep learning. Unlike traditional optimizers that directly integrate momentum into updates, Grams separates the update direction, derived from current gradients, from momentum, which is used solely for adaptive magnitude scaling. This approach enables Grams to achieve improved loss descent compared to state-of-the-art cautious and momentum-based optimizers. We theoretically demonstrate that Grams descents faster than other state-of-the-art optimizers and establish a global convergence guarantee for Grams. We also validate its effectiveness through extensive empirical evaluations. The results demonstrate Grams' superior performance, including faster convergence and better generalization, compared to widely-used optimizers such as Adam, Lion, and their cautious variants. Our results highlight Grams' potential as a transformative approach for efficiently training and fine-tuning large language models. Code is available at https://github.com/Gunale0926/Grams.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. OmniOpt: Taxonomy, Geometry, and Benchmarking of Modern Optimizers

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A meta-pipeline plus LMO four-axis view yields a dual taxonomy of 108 optimizers, and a multi-objective LLM/vision benchmark shows no single family dominates the quality–cost–memory frontier.

  2. High-Order Matching for One-Step Shortcut Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    HOMO extends shortcut diffusion with acceleration and jerk supervision, but the proof of superior approximation is not supported and experiments lack error bars.

  3. Video Latent Flow Matching: Optimal Polynomial Projections for Video Interpolation and Extrapolation

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    VLFM models video latent patches as a HiPPO-LegS polynomial flow and trains a flow matching model to generate frames, claiming bounded interpolation and extrapolation error.

Pith tools