Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MSC-Bench: Benchmarking and Analyzing Multi-Sensor Corruption for Driving Perception

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.01037 v1 pith:GCYYXE2A submitted 2025-01-02 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CV
keywords modelsbenchmarkdrivingmulti-sensorautonomouscorruptionperceptionsensor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-sensor fusion models play a crucial role in autonomous driving perception, particularly in tasks like 3D object detection and HD map construction. These models provide essential and comprehensive static environmental information for autonomous driving systems. While camera-LiDAR fusion methods have shown promising results by integrating data from both modalities, they often depend on complete sensor inputs. This reliance can lead to low robustness and potential failures when sensors are corrupted or missing, raising significant safety concerns. To tackle this challenge, we introduce the Multi-Sensor Corruption Benchmark (MSC-Bench), the first comprehensive benchmark aimed at evaluating the robustness of multi-sensor autonomous driving perception models against various sensor corruptions. Our benchmark includes 16 combinations of corruption types that disrupt both camera and LiDAR inputs, either individually or concurrently. Extensive evaluations of six 3D object detection models and four HD map construction models reveal substantial performance degradation under adverse weather conditions and sensor failures, underscoring critical safety issues. The benchmark toolkit and affiliated code and model checkpoints have been made publicly accessible.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SafeMap: Robust HD Map Construction from Incomplete Observations

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SafeMap improves HD map construction accuracy under missing camera views by reconstructing the missing perspective features with Gaussian-sampled attention and correcting the BEV features through distillation.

  2. Multi-Sensor Alignment for Weather Simulations

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new cross-sensor weather-simulation alignment method makes fog severity and snow/rain particle positions consistent between LiDAR and camera, yielding less optimistic but more robust 3D detection evaluations.

  3. Foundation Models for Autonomous Driving Perception: A Survey Through Core Capabilities

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Foundation-model perception for autonomous driving is surveyed through four capability lenses: generalized knowledge, spatial understanding, multi-sensor robustness, and temporal understanding.

  4. What Really Matters for Robust Multi-Sensor HD Map Construction?

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Combining data augmentation, cross-modal attention fusion, and modality dropout training improves robustness of camera-LiDAR HD map construction under 13 synthetic sensor corruptions and raises clean nuScenes mAP to 77.0.

Pith tools