Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Propagation of chaos for multi-species moderately interacting particle systems up to Newtonian singularity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A multi-species particle system converges at an algebraic rate to its aggregation-diffusion limit, even for Newtonian/Coulomb kernels.

desk verdict A genuinely new multi-species propagation-of-chaos result with algebraic rate up to Coulomb singularity; the proof has a repairable gap in a law-of-large-numbers lemma but the strategy is sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03087 v1 pith:ZX3MPLIX submitted 2025-01-06 math.PR math.AP

José Antonio Carrillo , Shuchen Guo , Alexandra Holzinger This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.AP MSC 60K3582C2235K5560F05
keywords multi-speciesaggregation-diffusionmoderateinteractionpropagationofchaosrelativeentropysingularpotentialsCoulombsingularitymean-fieldlimitstoppingtime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to prove that multi-species aggregation-diffusion equations with interaction kernels as singular as the Newtonian/Coulomb potential $V(x)=|x|^{-s}$, $00$ is arbitrarily small. The proof works in two stages: a relative-entropy comparison between the particle system and an intermediate regularised PDE, and a combined relative-entropy/$L^2$ comparison between that intermediate PDE and the singular limiting system; the first stage is closed by a stopping-time argument yielding convergence in probability with arbitrarily high algebraic rate. If correct, this gives the first multi-species algebraic propagation-of-chaos bound reaching Newtonian/Coulomb singularity without truncating the particle interaction.

What carries the argument

The machinery has three load-bearing pieces. First is the renormalised relative entropy $H(f_{N,\varepsilon}\mid \tilde f_{N,\varepsilon})/N$, whose time derivative is controlled by the squared $L^2$ discrepancy between the empirical interaction field and its convolution expectation. Second is a stopping-time argument: a process $S_\lambda(t)=N^\lambda \max_{\alpha,i}|\tilde X^\varepsilon_{\alpha,i}(t\wedge\tau_\lambda)-X^\varepsilon_{\alpha,i}(t\wedge\tau_\lambda)|$ is shown to have arbitrarily small high moments, giving convergence in probability at scale $N^{-\lambda}$. Third is an auxiliary integrable kernel $$ K^\varepsilon(x)=\begin{cases} |x|^{-(s+2)} & |x|\ge 4\varepsilon,\\ (4\varepsilon)^{-(s+2)} & |x|<4\varepsilon,\end{cases} $$ which provides a uniform bound $|\nabla V^\varepsilon_{\alpha\beta}(x+\xi)-\nabla V^\varepsilon_{\alpha\beta}(x)|\le C K^\varepsilon(x)|\xi|$ for $|\xi|\le 2\varepsilon$, replacing the Taylor expansion that blocked Coulomb singularities in earlier work. These pieces feed a multi-species law-of-large-numbers lemma and a combined $L^2$/relative-entropy estimate between the intermediate and limiting PDEs.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate the $L^2(0,T;H^1)$ norm of the intermediate PDE solution for a Newtonian kernel $V(x)=|x|^{-1}$ in $d=3$ with initial data violating (2.10): divergence of $\sup_\varepsilon \int_0^T \|\nabla \tilde f_{\alpha,\varepsilon}\|^2_{L^2}\,dt$ would falsify the uniform bound (1.9) and hence the theorem's hypotheses. Alternatively, since the stated rate exponent $\zeta$ becomes negative for $\ell>1/(2s+4)$, a simulation showing convergence for such $\ell$ would contradict the claimed parameter range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim of the paper is that, under assumptions (H1)--(H7) and a uniform-in-$\varepsilon$ regularity bound on the intermediate PDE, the relative entropy and the $L^1$ distance between the $K$-th marginal of the interacting particle system and the tensorised solution of the limiting aggregation-diffusion system decay algebraically in $N$. The admissible singularities cover $V(x)=|x|^{-s}$ for $0<s\le d-2$, including the Newtonian/Coulomb case $s=d-2$, with no additional cut-off on the microscopic level. The rate is $$ \sup_{t\in[0,T]}\Big\|$f^{{(K)}}$_{N,\varepsilon}(t)-\prod_{\$\alpha$=1}^n \bar f_\$alpha^{{\otimes K_\alpha}}$\Big\|_{$L^{1}$(\mathbb{R}^{d|K|})}\le C(T) $N^{{-\zeta}}$,\qquad \zeta=\min\{\ell,\tfrac12-\ell(s+2)-\rho\}, $$ with $\varepsilon=N^{-\ell}$ and $\rho>0$ arbitrarily small. The proof splits into a mean-field estimate (particles to regularised PDE) and a PDE error estimate (regularised PDE to singular limit), and crucially proves convergence in probability by a stopping time rather than by Taylor-expanding the singular kernel. The result therefore gives a quantitative microscopic derivation of multi-species aggregation-diffusion systems, including the parabolic-elliptic chemotaxis model in dimensions $d\ge 3$ under the stated smallness assumptions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the uniform-in-$\varepsilon$ bound (1.9) on the regularised intermediate PDE solutions; the paper only verifies this bound under a smallness condition on the initial data, so if that bound fails the algebraic rate (1.11) has no foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the main theorem is correct, the particle derivation of multi-species aggregation-diffusion systems, including chemotaxis and two-species plasma models, becomes quantitative in the particle number $N$ rather than merely qualitative.
  • The algebraic rate opens a route to fluctuation results: the paper states that the algebraic nature of the bound is a starting point for analysing fluctuations of the microscopic particle system.
  • No truncation of the singular potential is needed on the particle level, so the microscopic model is the natural regularised Coulomb dynamics rather than a modified one.
  • In the sub-Coulomb regime, or with $W^{1,1}\cap W^{1,\infty}$ initial data, the rate improves to $\zeta=\min\{\ell,\tfrac12-\ell(s+1)-\rho\}$, as noted in Remark 1.3(iii).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the optimal balance in the rate suggests choosing $\varepsilon=N^{-1/(2s+4)}$, which gives the best algebraic rate $N^{-1/(2s+4)+o(1)}$ in the Coulomb case $s=d-2$; the paper does not state this optimisation explicitly.
  • The proof's reliance on the uniform-in-$\varepsilon$ bound (1.9) means that the main bottleneck for removing the small-initial-data condition is a purely PDE regularity question: if (1.9) were established for large data, the whole propagation-of-chaos statement would follow without changing the particle-level argument.
  • The same two-step entropy scheme with a modified auxiliary kernel may extend to $d=2$ logarithmic Coulomb interactions; the paper explicitly identifies why its current $V_{\mathrm{in}}/V_{\mathrm{out}}$ decomposition fails there, pointing to the technical step a two-dimensional proof would need to replace.
  • The arbitrary-algebraic-rate convergence in probability is likely the right quantitative input for central-limit-theorem-type fluctuation bounds around the mean-field limit; the authors flag fluctuations as future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives a quantitative propagation of chaos result for multi-species, moderately interacting particle systems approximating aggregation-diffusion systems with singular potentials up to Newtonian/Coulomb type. The main theorem, Theorem 1.2, states that under assumptions (H1)-(H7) and a uniform-in-epsilon bound (1.9), the L1 distance between any K-th marginal of the particle system and the tensorized limiting solution decays algebraically in N, with rate zeta = min{ell, 1/2 - ell(s+2) - rho}. The proof follows a two-step strategy: first a mean-field estimate comparing the particle system with an intermediate regularized PDE via relative entropy, and second a PDE error estimate comparing the intermediate PDE with the limit. The well-posedness of the limiting system is established under a smallness condition on the initial data. The argument is detailed and carefully tracks constants, but the proof of a key law-of-large-numbers lemma has a missing diagonal-term justification when applied to the auxiliary kernel K^epsilon, and the main theorem remains conditional on a uniform-in-epsilon bound that is only verified under a smallness condition.

Significance. If fully repaired, this would be a notable contribution: it extends quantitative propagation of chaos for moderately interacting systems to multi-species settings with attractive/repulsive singular kernels up to Newtonian/Coulomb type, without an additional cutoff at the particle level and with algebraic rates. The paper is transparent about the main hypothesis (1.9) and provides a large amount of detail, including the stopping-time argument and the PDE estimates. The treatment of the Coulomb case via the auxiliary kernel K^epsilon is a useful technique. However, the load-bearing law-of-large-numbers lemma has a gap for the auxiliary kernel, and the regime of applicability is restricted by the smallness condition needed for (1.9). These issues are likely repairable, but they need to be addressed before the result can be considered fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A.2, Lemma 3.2] The proof of Lemma 3.2 claims that E[h_{ij} | ~X_{alpha,i}(t)] = 0 and that terms where an index appears exactly once have zero expectation. This is only true for j != i. For j = i, the term is h_{ii} = psi(0) - (psi * ~f_{beta,epsilon})(~X_{alpha,i}), which is not centered. For the gradient kernels psi = nabla V^epsilon_{alpha,beta} this is harmless because psi(0)=0, but Lemma 3.2 is also applied to the auxiliary kernel K^epsilon in (3.13), (3.19)-(3.20), and Section 4, and K^epsilon(0) = (4epsilon)^{-(s+2)} = O(N^{ell(s+2)}). The diagonal contribution to the empirical average is then of size N^{ell(s+2)-1}; under the parameter range (1.10) this is smaller than the threshold N^{-theta} for the allowed theta, so the final estimates likely survive after splitting off the diagonal and recentering. However, the written proof does not justify the vanishing of the diagonal terms, and this is a gap in a load-bearing lemma as stated.
  2. [Theorem 1.2 and Lemma 6.1] Theorem 1.2 is conditional on the uniform-in-epsilon bound (1.9), which is used throughout Sections 3, 4, and 5. Lemma 6.1 establishes this bound only under the scale-invariant smallness condition (2.10)/(6.7) on the initial data. The authors acknowledge this in Remark 1.3(i), but the main theorem is therefore stated in a regime whose only verified sufficient condition is small initial mass or large diffusion. This is not a mathematical error, but it is a substantial restriction on the scope of the claimed propagation of chaos result, and the abstract and introductory statements could mislead readers about the unconditional nature of the result.
  3. [Section 3, equations (3.10)-(3.11) and (3.14)-(3.16)] The auxiliary kernel K^epsilon is used with the local Lipschitz bound (3.11), and its convolution with ~f_{beta,epsilon} is controlled in (3.14)-(3.16) using the uniform-in-epsilon bound (1.9). In the Coulomb case, the resulting bound is C(T) ell log N, and the admissible range of ell in (1.10) is expressed in terms of C0 = 2(C4 T + d), where C4 itself depends on the same uniform bound (1.9). Consequently, the range of ell is not explicit in terms of the original data alone; it depends on the a priori bound that the theorem assumes. The paper should clarify that (1.10) is a condition relative to the unknown or assumed constant C(T) in (1.9).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Lemma 3.4] In the statement of Lemma 3.4, the Itô differential is written as 'd tau |...|^p = ... d tau(...)', which is a typo: the differential on the left should be 'd |...|^p' and the differential on the right should be 'd(...)' rather than 'd tau(...)'.
  2. [Section 1, equation (1.2)] The text after (1.2) says 'V^epsilon_{alpha,beta} = chi_epsilon * V^epsilon_{alpha,beta}', which is self-referential; it should read 'V^epsilon_{alpha,beta} = chi_epsilon * V_{alpha,beta}' to match (H5).
  3. [Section 3, equation (3.3)] The set A^N_{theta, Psi_epsilon} in (3.3) uses the absolute value for functions that may take values in R, R^d, or R^{d x d}; the paper should specify that |.| denotes the Euclidean or Frobenius norm depending on the target space, although this is implicit from the usage.
  4. [Remark 1.3(iii) and Remark 4.2] The improved rate in the sub-Coulomb or higher-regularity case is stated as zeta = min{ell, 1/2 - ell(s+1) - rho}, while the main theorem states zeta = min{ell, 1/2 - ell(s+2) - rho}. The distinction is clear from context, but a sentence pointing to the exact source of the improved exponent in (4.6) would help readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The derivation is self-contained: the intermediate PDE is a tool, not an assumed target, and the final rate emerges from a genuine two-step triangle estimate with no fitted constants.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is: (i) compare the Liouville/particle distribution f_{N,ε} to the tensorised intermediate PDE solution via relative entropy (Proposition 2.3), using an explicit law-of-large-numbers lemma and a stopping-time argument; (ii) compare the intermediate PDE to the limiting aggregation-diffusion system via a combined L2-distance plus relative entropy estimate (Proposition 2.4); (iii) combine these by triangle inequality and Csiszár-Kullback-Pinsker. The uniform-in-ε bound (1.9) is explicitly stated as a hypothesis of Theorem 1.2 and independently established in Lemma 6.1 under smallness condition (2.10); it is not assumed from the conclusion of the theorem. The rate ζ = min{ℓ, 1/2 − ℓ(s+2) − ρ} is obtained by optimizing the auxiliary parameter λ close to 1/2 − ℓ(s+1) and using ε = N^{−ℓ}; it is not fitted to reproduce the claimed convergence. Self-citations to [12, Lemma 17] and [26, Lemma 4.2] are used for elementary mollifier bounds and as inspiration for the LLN/stopping-time technique, but the proofs are either reproduced in the appendix or are standard estimates, so they are not load-bearing circularity. The only substantive concern I see is a possible missing diagonal-term justification in the written proof of Lemma 3.2 when the lemma is applied to the auxiliary kernel K^ε; this is a correctness gap in a technical lemma, not circularity, and the stated rates appear robust to splitting off the j=i term.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are the regularization exponent ell and the mollifier chi, both chosen by the modeler. The axioms are standard mathematical tools plus the domain assumptions on the potentials, initial data, and the smallness condition required for global well-posedness.

free parameters (2)
  • regularization exponent ell = 0 < ell < 1/C0 for Coulomb (s=d-2), 0 < ell < 1/(2s+4) for sub-Coulomb; C0 depends on T,d,n, diffusion and mollifier…
    Chosen by hand to balance competing error terms in the proof; it is not fitted to any data but is a free modeling parameter that controls the relation epsilon = N^{-ell}. The final convergence rate zeta depends on ell.
  • mollifier chi = any smooth, compactly supported, radially symmetric probability density with supp chi subset B_1
    The regularized potentials V^epsilon = V * chi_epsilon depend on this choice, and the constants C0, C4, and the final rate depend on its W^{2,1} cap W^{2,infinity} norm. The theorem holds for any such chi, but the quantitative constants vary.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard stochastic calculus and analytic inequalities: Ito's formula, Gronwall's inequality, Csiszar-Kullback-Pinsker inequality, Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev and Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities.
    These are used without proof throughout, e.g., in the relative entropy evolution (Section 4) and the Lp estimates (Section 6).
  • domain assumption Assumptions (H1)-(H7): V(x)=|x|^{-s}, 0<s<=d-2, coefficients a_alpha beta in R, diffusion sigma_alpha > 0, initial densities in L1 cap L^infinity, i.i.d. initial data, and independent Brownian motions.
    These define the class of systems studied; they are stated in the introduction and used to set up the SDE and Liouville equation.
  • domain assumption Smallness condition (2.10) on the initial data, or equivalently the uniform-in-epsilon bound (1.9) on the intermediate PDE solutions.
    Theorem 1.2 assumes (1.9) directly, and Lemma 6.1 derives it from (2.10). Without this bound the estimates in Sections 3, 4 and 5 do not close.
  • ad hoc to paper Auxiliary function K_epsilon defined in (3.10) is integrable in a suitable sense and satisfies the local Lipschitz bound (3.11) for |xi| <= 2 epsilon.
    This function is introduced specifically to handle the Coulomb singularity without Taylor expansion; its properties are tailored to this proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Propagation of chaos for multi-species moderately interacting particle systems up to Newtonian singularity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZX3MPLIX

@misc{pith2026250103087,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Propagation of chaos for multi-species moderately interacting particle systems up to Newtonian singularity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZX3MPLIX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03087}
}
abstract

We derive a class of multi-species aggregation-diffusion systems from stochastic interacting particle systems via relative entropy method with quantitative bounds. We show an algebraic $L^1$-convergence result using moderately interacting particle systems approximating attractive/repulsive singular potentials up to Newtonian/Coulomb singularities without additional cut-off on the particle level. The first step is to make use of the relative entropy between the joint distribution of the particle system and an approximated limiting aggregation-diffusion system. A crucial argument in the proof is to show convergence in probability by a stopping time argument. The second step is to obtain a quantitative convergence rate to the limiting aggregation-diffusion system from the approximated PDE system. This is shown by evaluating a combination of relative entropy and $L^2$-distance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-species McKean-Vlasov dynamics in non-convex landscapes

    math.PR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Multi-species mean-field particle systems with quadratic interactions are shown to exhibit phase transitions, with unique or multiple stationary states depending on noise, under a structural assumption that reduces th...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bailo, J

    R. Bailo, J. A. Carrillo, and D. G´ omez-Castro. Aggregat ion-diffusion equations for collective behaviour in the sciences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16679 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Baladron, D

    J. Baladron, D. Fasoli, O. Faugeras, and J. Touboul. Mean -field description and propaga- tion of chaos in networks of hodgkin-huxley and fitzhugh-nag umo neurons. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, 2:1–50, 2012

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Bresch, P.-E

    D. Bresch, P.-E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. Mean field limit and qu antitative estimates with singular attractive kernels. Duke Mathematical Journal , 172(13):2591–2641, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    J. A. Carrillo, K. Craig, and Y. Yao. Aggregation-diffusio n equations: dynamics, asymptotics, and singular limits. In Active particles. Vol. 2. Advances in theory, models, and ap plications, Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol., pages 65–108. Birkh¨ ause r/Springer, Cham, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    J. A. Carrillo, X. Feng, S. Guo, P.-E. Jabin, and Z. Wang. R elative entropy method for particle approximation of the landau equation for maxwelli an molecules. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15035, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    J. A. Carrillo and S. Guo. Interacting particle approxim ation of cross-diffusion systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05094, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    J. A. Carrillo, Y. Salmaniw, and J. Skrzeczkowski. Well- posedness of aggregation-diffusion systems with irregular kernels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09227 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    L. Chen, E. S. Daus, A. Holzinger, and A. J¨ ungel. Rigorou s derivation of population cross- diffusion systems from moderately interacting particle syst ems. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 31:1–38, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    L. Chen, E. S. Daus, and A. J¨ ungel. Rigorous mean-field li mit and cross-diffusion. Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 70:1–21, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    L. Chen, V. Gvozdik, A. Holzinger, and Y. Li. Rigorous de rivation of the degenerate parabolic- elliptic keller-segel system from a moderately interactin g stochastic particle system. part ii propagation of chaos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08763 , 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    L. Chen, A. Holzinger, and X. Huo. Quantitative converg ence in relative entropy for a mod- erately interacting particle system on rd. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01980 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    L. Chen, A. Holzinger, and A. J¨ ungel. Fluctuations aro und the mean-field limit for attractive riesz potentials in the moderate regime. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15128 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    L. Chen, P. Nikolaev, and D. J. Pr¨ omel. Well-posednessof diffusion–aggregation equations with bounded kernels and their mean-field approximations. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 47(11):9222–9248, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Clifford and A

    P. Clifford and A. Sudbury. A model for spatial conflict. Biometrika, 60(3):581–588, 1973

    1973

  7. [15]

    A. C. de Courcel, M. Rosenzweig, and S. Serfaty. The attr active log gas: stability, uniqueness, and propagation of chaos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14560 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A. Dembo. Large deviations techniques and applications . Springer, 2009. 40

    2009

  9. [17]

    Figalli and R

    A. Figalli and R. Philipowski. Convergence to the visco us porous medium equation and propagation of chaos. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat , 4:185–203, 2008

    2008

  10. [18]

    Flandoli, C

    F. Flandoli, C. Olivera, and M. Simon. Uniform approxim ation of 2 dimensional navier–stokes equation by stochastic interacting particle systems. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 52(6):5339–5362, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Fontbona and S

    J. Fontbona and S. M´ el´ eard. Non local lotka-volterra system with cross-diffusion in an het- erogeneous medium. Journal of mathematical biology , 70:829–854, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Fournier and B

    N. Fournier and B. Jourdain. Stochastic particle appro ximation of the keller–segel equation and two-dimensional generalization of bessel processes. Annals of Applied Probability , 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Fournier and Y

    N. Fournier and Y. Tardy. Collisions of the supercritic al keller–segel particle system. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Garnier, G

    J. Garnier, G. Papanicolaou, and T.-W. Yang. Consensus convergence with stochastic effects. Vietnam J. Math. , 45(1-2):51–75, 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    G´ omez-Castro

    D. G´ omez-Castro. Beginner’s guide to aggregation-di ffusion equations. SeMA J. , 81(4):531– 587, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Guo and D

    S. Guo and D. Luo. Scaling limit of moderately interacti ng particle systems with singular interaction and environmental noise. The Annals of Applied Probability , 33(3):2066–2102, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Hao, J.-F

    Z. Hao, J.-F. Jabir, S. Menozzi, M. R¨ ockner, and X. Zhan g. Propagation of chaos for moder- ately interacting particle systems related to singular kin etic mckean-vlasov sdes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09195, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Holzinger

    A. Holzinger. Rigorous derivations of diffusion systems from moderately i nteracting particle models. PhD thesis, Technische Universit¨ at Wien, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Huang, J.-G

    H. Huang, J.-G. Liu, and J. Lu. Learning interacting par ticle systems: Diffusion parameter estimation for aggregation equations. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , 29(01):1–29, 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Huang, J.-G

    H. Huang, J.-G. Liu, and P. Pickl. On the mean-field limit for the vlasov–poisson–fokker–planck system. J Stat Phys 181, 1915–1965 , 2020

    1915

  21. [29]

    Jabin and Z

    P.-E. Jabin and Z. Wang. Mean field limit for stochastic p article systems. Active Particles, Volume 1: Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications , pages 379–402, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    Jabin and Z

    P.-E. Jabin and Z. Wang. Quantitative estimates of prop agation of chaos for stochastic systems with w−1,∞ kernels. Inventiones mathematicae, 214:523–591, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    Jourdain

    B. Jourdain. Convergence of moderately interacting pa rticle systems to a diffusion–convection equation. Stochastic processes and their applications , 73(2):247–270, 1998

    1998

  24. [32]

    Jourdain and S

    B. Jourdain and S. M´ el´ eard. Propagation of chaos and fluctuations for a moderate model with smooth initial data. In Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probability and Sta tistics, volume 34, pages 727–766. Elsevier, 1998

    1998

  25. [33]

    J¨ ungel

    A. J¨ ungel. Transport equations for semiconductors , volume 773. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009. 41

    2009

  26. [34]

    M. Kac. Foundations of kinetic theory. In Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1954–1955, vol. III, pages 171–197. Univ. California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles, Calif., 1956

    1954

  27. [35]

    Karmakar and G

    D. Karmakar and G. Wolansky. On Patlak-Keller-Segel sy stem for several populations: a gradient flow approach. J. Differential Equations , 267(12):7483–7520, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Karmakar and G

    D. Karmakar and G. Wolansky. On the critical mass Patlak -Keller-Segel system for multi- species populations: global existence and infinite time agg regation. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 71(6):2477–2527, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel. Initiation of slime mold agg regation viewed as an instability. Journal of theoretical biology , 26(3):399–415, 1970

    1970

  30. [38]

    Y. Li, L. Chen, and Z. Zhang. Convergence towards the pop ulation cross-diffusion system from stochastic many-particle system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.03306 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    E. H. Lieb. Sharp constants in the hardy-littlewood-so bolev and related inequalities. In Inequalities: Selecta of Elliott H. Lieb , pages 529–554. Springer, 1983

    1983

  32. [40]

    Liu and R

    J.-G. Liu and R. Yang. Propagation of chaos for the kelle r–segel equation with a logarithmic cut-off. Methods and Applications of Analysis , 26(4):319–348, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    P. A. Markowich, C. A. Ringhofer, and C. Schmeiser. Semiconductor equations . Springer- Verlag, Vienna, 1990

    1990

  34. [42]

    H. P. McKean. Propagation of chaos for a class of non-lin ear parabolic equations. Stochastic Differential Equations (Lecture Series in Differential Equa tions, Session 7, Catholic Univ., 1967), pages 41–57, 1967

    1967

  35. [43]

    M´ el´ eard and S

    S. M´ el´ eard and S. Roelly-Coppoletta. A propagation o f chaos result for a system of particles with moderate interaction. Stochastic processes and their applications , 26:317–332, 1987

    1987

  36. [44]

    Miclo and P

    L. Miclo and P. Del Moral. Genealogies and increasing pr opagation of chaos for feynman-kac and genetic models. The Annals of Applied Probability , 11(4):1166–1198, 2001

    2001

  37. [45]

    Nikolaev and D

    P. Nikolaev and D. J. Pr¨ omel. Quantitative relative en tropy estimates on the whole space for convolution interaction forces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08938 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Oelschl¨ ager

    K. Oelschl¨ ager. A law of large numbers for moderately i nteracting diffusion processes. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete , 69(2):279–322, 1985

    1985

  39. [47]

    Oelschl¨ ager

    K. Oelschl¨ ager. A fluctuation theorem for moderately i nteracting diffusion processes. Proba- bility theory and related fields , 74(4):591–616, 1987

    1987

  40. [48]

    Olivera, A

    C. Olivera, A. Richard, and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c. Quantitative particle approximation of nonlinear fokker-planck equations with singular kernel. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa- Classe di Scienze , 24(3):691–649, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Olivera, A

    C. Olivera, A. Richard, and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c. Quantitati ve approximation of the burgers and keller-segel equations by moderately interacting particl es. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03177v3 , 2024

    2004 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Pr´ evˆ ot and M

    C. Pr´ evˆ ot and M. R¨ ockner.A concise course on stochastic partial differential equatio ns, volume

  43. [51]

    Roub ´ ıˇ cek.Nonlinear partial differential equations with application s, volume 153

    T. Roub ´ ıˇ cek.Nonlinear partial differential equations with application s, volume 153. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  44. [52]

    S. Serfaty. Mean field limit for coulomb-type flows. Duke Mathematical Journal , 169(15), 2020

    2020

  45. [53]

    S. Serfaty. Lectures on coulomb and riesz gases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21194 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Shafrir and G

    I. Shafrir and G. Wolansky. Moser-Trudinger and logari thmic HLS inequalities for systems. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 7(4):413–448, 2005

    2005

  47. [55]

    A. Stevens. The derivation of chemotaxis equations as l imit dynamics of moderately interacting stochastic many-particle systems. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 61(1):183–212, 2000

    2000

  48. [56]

    Y. Tardy. Convergence of the empirical measure for the k eller-segel model in both subcritical and critical cases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.04968 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    C. Villani. Topics in optimal transportation , volume 58. American Mathematical Soc., 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    Wolansky

    G. Wolansky. Multi-components chemotactic system in t he absence of conflicts. European J. Appl. Math. , 13(6):641–661, 2002. 43

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.