Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Expanding the parameter space of 2002es-like type Ia supernovae: on the underluminous ASASSN-20jq / SN 2020qxp

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ASASSN-20jq is a faint Type Ia supernova whose normal light curve cannot be standardized by current distance relations.

desk verdict A well-observed, genuinely peculiar SN Ia that is a robust outlier in the Phillips relation; the data deserve publication, but the off-center DDT interpretation rests on a marginal [O I] detection and a qualitative single-model comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04086 v2 pith:FIF4KZ5C submitted 2025-01-07 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

Subhash Bose , Maximilian D. Stritzinger , Chris Ashall , Eddie Baron , Peter Hoeflich , L. Galbany , W. B. Hoogendam , E. A. M. Jensen
show 18 more authors
C. S. Kochanek R. S. Post A. Reguitti N. Elias-Rosa K. Z. Stanek Peter Lundqvist Katie Auchettl Alejandro Clocchiatti A. Fiore Claudia P. Gutiérrez Jason T. Hinkle Mark E. Huber T. de Jaeger Andrea Pastorello Anna V. Payne Mark Phillips Benjamin J. Shappee Michael A. Tucker
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords TypeIasupernovae2002es-likeASASSN-20jqoff-centerdelayeddetonationnebularspectroscopyluminosity-widthrelationwhitedwarf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the Type Ia supernova ASASSN-20jq, while peaking at a faint absolute magnitude of $M_B=-17.1$ mag, declines at the normal rate of $\Delta m_{15}(B)=1.35$ mag, making it a strong outlier in both the luminosity–width and luminosity–color–stretch relations that are used to standardize Type Ia distances. The authors argue that the object belongs to the heterogeneous 2002es-like class and that its nebular spectra carry signatures of a particular explosion geometry: a high-density white dwarf disrupted by an off-center delayed detonation that produced roughly equal amounts of $^{56}$Ni in the deflagration and detonation phases. Such a case matters because if similar objects exist in cosmological samples, they evade the light-curve corrections applied to standard Type Ia supernovae.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the off-center delayed-detonation (DDT) explosion model of a high-central-density ($\rho_c \approx 4\times10^9$ g cm$^{-3}$) carbon–oxygen white dwarf. A central deflagration first burns about $0.3\,M_\odot$ and produces an inner, roughly spherical region of electron-capture elements surrounded by $^{56}$Ni ashes; the detonation then ignites at an off-center point on an already expanding background, so the detonation products, including $^{40}$Ca and additional $^{56}$Ni, are distributed asymmetrically in a banana-shaped ring. Viewed from the adopted angle, this geometry naturally produces redshifted [Ca II] and [O I] lines from the detonation ashes while the iron-group lines from the centrally distributed deflagration ashes stay unshifted, and gives the tilted-top [Fe II] profiles observed in both the optical and near-infrared.

What would settle it

A deep, high-signal-to-noise nebular spectrum of ASASSN-20jq obtained near the same phases (+200 to +350 days) that fails to show both [O I] components with a 6300/6364 flux ratio near 1.67 and at the claimed ~2200 km s$^{-1}$ redshift would remove the paper's key spectroscopic support for the off-center detonation geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

ASASSN-20jq is a low-luminosity Type Ia supernova whose light-curve shape is normal: it has a decline rate $\Delta m_{15}(B)=1.35\pm0.09$ mag and a color-stretch parameter $s_{BV}\gtrsim0.82$, yet it lies roughly 2.5 mag below the standard luminosity–width and luminosity–color–stretch relations, a deviation not seen in any other reported supernova. Its nebular spectra show a strong, narrow forbidden [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda7291,7324$ doublet redshifted by about 1700 km s$^{-1}$, a marginal detection of an [O I] $\lambda\lambda6300,6364$ doublet redshifted by about 2200 km s$^{-1}$, and [Fe II] lines at 7155 Å and 1.644 $\mu$m with identical tilted-top profiles whose peaks appear shifted by about 1400 km s$^{-1}$. The paper interprets these features as the view of an off-center delayed detonation in a Chandrasekhar-mass, high-central-density white dwarf that synthesized comparable amounts of $^{56}$Ni in the deflagration and detonation phases, and it shows that a synthetic nebular spectrum of such a model, extended to optical wavelengths and supplemented by macroscopic mixing, reproduces the observations.

Load-bearing premise

The off-center, asymmetric-explosion interpretation relies on the marginal ~6350 Å feature being a genuine [O I] doublet redshifted by about 2200 km s$^{-1}$; the paper itself describes the detection as low signal-to-noise, so if that feature is noise or a blend the specific geometry is no longer anchored by oxygen.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the off-center DDT interpretation is correct, ASASSN-20jq shows that high-density, near-accretion-induced-collapse white dwarfs can produce faint Type Ia explosions whose light curves nonetheless mimic normal decline rates.
  • Objects like ASASSN-20jq, being 2.5 mag fainter than the $s_{BV}$ relation predicts, would escape the empirical standardization used in cosmology and would bias distance measurements if present in a survey sample.
  • The equal production of $^{56}$Ni in the deflagration and detonation phases provides a diagnostic that distinguishes this channel from both normal-bright and 1991bg-like subluminous events.
  • The redshifted intermediate-mass-element lines alongside unshifted iron lines give an observational probe of the explosion geometry that can be applied to future 2002es-like supernovae observed into the nebular phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A statistical consequence not drawn in the paper: if off-center DDT events are common among 2002es-like supernovae, nebular [Ca II] and [O I] line shifts should appear in roughly equal numbers as red- and blueshifts depending on viewing angle, rather than predominantly redshifted as in this single object.
  • The assumed Tully-Fisher distance dominates the absolute-magnitude scale; a direct distance measurement to NGC 5002 would test whether the 2.5-mag offset from the relations persists or shrinks.
  • The proposed geometry predicts that the [O I] doublet, if confirmed, should fade in step with [Ca II] as the same detonation ashes are radiatively cooling, so a late-time spectrum several hundred days after explosion could test the association.
  • If the marginal [O I] feature is instead a blend, the central explosion-geometry claim would weaken substantially, but the redshifted [Ca II] and asymmetric [Fe II] profiles would still require an asymmetric inner ejecta structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents optical photometry and spectroscopy of the Type Ia supernova ASASSN-20jq/SN 2020qxp, covering the photospheric and nebular phases. The authors derive a low peak luminosity (MB = -17.1 mag), a normal decline rate (dm15(B) = 1.35 mag), a color-stretch lower limit (sBV > 0.82), and a low ejected 56Ni mass (0.088 solar masses). They identify a tentative early light-curve bump, strong intermediate-mass-element features near maximum, and, in the nebular phase, redshifted [Ca II] and a marginal [O I] doublet along with a tilted-top [Fe II] profile. The paper interprets these observations with an off-center delayed-detonation model of a high-central-density Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf, proposing roughly equal 56Ni production in the deflagration and detonation phases, and classifies the object as an extreme member of the heterogeneous 2002es-like class.

Significance. If the explosion-mechanism interpretation is secure, the paper provides a rare observational anchor for off-center delayed detonations in high-density white dwarfs and expands the 2002es-like parameter space in an instructive way. The dataset itself is valuable: multi-band light curves extending past one year, thirteen optical spectra, careful treatment of distance, reddening, and template fitting, and a host-galaxy analysis are all presented transparently. The paper also gives explicit credit to the earlier Hoeflich et al. (2021) NIR model and extends that comparison to the optical. The main caveat is that the two most decisive pieces of evidence for the asymmetric explosion are a tentative line identification and a single-model, visually judged spectral comparison; as a result, the geometric conclusion is currently more suggestive than uniquely established.

major comments (3)
  1. [5.2, Fig. 16] The [O I] identification is not established at the level needed to support the geometric conclusion. The paper itself states that the 6364 angstrom component is 'dominated by the spectral noise,' and Table B.1 lists [Fe II] at 0.6355 microns and several [Co I]/[Co II] transitions in the 0.635-0.637 micron region, so a weak blend is a plausible alternative to a 2200 km/s redshifted [O I] doublet. Please provide a quantitative detection significance (for example a signal-to-noise estimate for the feature, or a bootstrap/Monte Carlo assessment of the continuum uncertainty), fit a one-line alternative to the same region, and state explicitly how the interpretation in the abstract and Section 7.2 changes if the feature is not [O I]. As written, one of the two intermediate-mass-element tracers used to locate the detonation products rests on a marginal detection.
  2. [7.2, Fig. 20] The off-center delayed-detonation conclusion is based on a single model (5p02822d40.16) selected from a grid produced by the same research group to match the peak brightness and decline rate, and the comparison is judged visually. The macroscopic mixing scale (2000 km/s) and the viewing angle (-90 degrees) are adjusted to improve agreement, with no uncertainty or uniqueness analysis. Please test alternatives quantitatively: vary the inclination and mixing scale over plausible ranges, show the goodness of fit relative to a non-off-center delayed-detonation model with the same 56Ni mass, and report residuals. As it stands, the equal-56Ni-in-deflagration-and-detonation claim is not uniquely established by the comparison.
  3. [4.2, Fig. 4] The early 'bump' rests on a single Pan-STARRS z-band point that is S-corrected to the r band using spectral energy distributions of SN 2011fe and SN 2017cbv, which are not 2002es-like objects. The paper acknowledges the inherent SED uncertainty, but the abstract and Section 7.1.1 later treat the early excess as an established property connecting ASASSN-20jq to the 2002es-like class. Please show explicitly how the 3-sigma excess changes when the S-correction SED is varied over a wider, more representative set, and whether the excess remains significant if that one point is excluded from the power-law fit. Without this, the early-bump claim is overstated relative to the evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [4.5, Fig. 8] In the right panel of Fig. 8 the point for ASASSN-20jq is plotted as a definite value, but the paper only obtains a lower limit of sBV > 0.82; the figure should use an arrow or another clear lower-limit marker.
  2. [5.2, Fig. 16] The top panel of Fig. 16 shows the [O I] region for the +229, +295, and +337 day spectra without noise or continuum uncertainty envelopes; adding a 1-sigma envelope would make the marginal nature of the detection easier to assess.
  3. [7.2] The optical nebular spectrum is at +229 days while the NIR model comparison uses a +192 day spectrum; the text says this is acceptable because the features evolve slowly, but the [O I] feature itself appears to grow between +229 and +337 days in Fig. 16. Please justify the phase-matching assumption in one sentence or show the model at two phases.
  4. [8] The summary states that the [O I] identification is 'most likely' correct, while the abstract presents the redshifted [O I] and [Ca II] lines as parallel evidence for the explosion geometry; consider making the abstract's hedging consistent with the detailed caveats in Sections 5.2 and 7.2.
  5. [5.1, Fig. 12] The Branch diagram labels 'CL', 'BL', 'CN', and 'SS' are not defined in the caption; please add a sentence defining the subtypes for readers outside the SN Ia taxonomy.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The off-center DDT conclusion is supported by a same-group model selected for this SN and then adjusted with a free mixing scale; the empirical measurements are independent, so the circularity is partial but load-bearing.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Sect. 7.2, model description]
    "As detailed in Hoeflich et al. (2021), model 5p02822d40.16 is most aligned with key photospheric phase observables of ASASSN-20jq, including its peak brightness and light-curve decline rate."

    The off-center DDT explosion mechanism and the specific model are taken from prior work by largely the same authors, and that model was selected for this SN because it matched photospheric brightness and decline. The paper then uses the same model's nebular match as evidence for the mechanism: the abstract concludes that the line profiles and redshifts 'suggest ... an off-center delayed-detonation explosion mechanism.' But the mechanism is an input to the model, not a prediction derived from it. The match demonstrates consistency with an assumed scenario, not an independent test of the scenario.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sect. 7.2 and Fig. 20 caption]
    "To this end, macroscopic, radial mixing was implemented into the benchmark model which alters the final abundance profiles. This was accomplished by including a velocity scale growing from 20% of the local expansion velocity to a maximum value of 2000 km s−1 ... The inclusion of macroscopic mixing effectively leads to an increased overlap ... the mixed model shows much better agreement with the previously noted Fe-group element complexes and the Ca II NIR triplet."

    The 2000 km/s macroscopic mixing scale and the −90° viewing angle are free inputs chosen after seeing the model's flux deficiencies at optical wavelengths. The improved agreement obtained with these tuned inputs is then presented as support for the off-center DDT interpretation. Because the parameters were adjusted to make the model match the same nebular spectra that are later cited as evidence, the agreement is partly manufactured by the fit and cannot independently validate the explosion geometry.

full rationale

The paper's empirical content is self-contained and not circular: the photometry, light-curve decline rates, color-stretch parameter, pseudo-equivalent widths, line velocities, 56Ni mass estimate, and host-galaxy properties are all measured or fitted directly to the observations. The classification of ASASSN-20jq as an extreme 2002es-like object is based on comparisons with other SNe and does not reduce to the model. The circularity concern is confined to the explosion-mechanism claim. The off-center DDT model is inherited from Hoeflich et al. (2021), authored by an overlapping group, and the specific model was chosen for this SN from a grid using its peak brightness and decline rate. A free macroscopic-mixing scale was then added to fix optical flux deficiencies before the model was declared to be in good agreement. The redshifted [Ca II] and tilted-top [Fe II] profiles are real, independently measured features, but their interpretation as the signature of an off-center DDT is an abductive match to a model whose defining geometry already encodes that mechanism. Thus the central physical conclusion is not forced by the data alone; it is a plausible, partially tuned interpretation. This is not a formal equation-level self-definitional circularity, so a score of 5 rather than higher is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central observational claims rest on standard photometric and spectroscopic assumptions plus an adopted distance and reddening. The explosion-mechanism claim rests on a self-cited model grid and on the marginal [O I] identification, which together constitute the main interpretive load. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • 56Ni mass (MNi) = 0.088 +/- 0.008 Msun
    Fitted to the UVOIR bolometric light curve using a radioactive decay model (Sec 4.7, Fig 10).
  • Gamma-ray trapping timescale (t0_gamma) = 58 +/- 5 days
    Fitted to the late-time light curve via the time-weighted integral and t^2 L ratio (Sec 4.7, Fig 10).
  • Early rise power-law index (alpha) = 1.99 (+0.59/-0.51)
    Fitted to the early r-band rise to estimate the time of first light (Sec 4.2, Fig 4).
  • Macroscopic mixing scale = 2000 km/s
    Chosen to improve agreement between the synthetic and observed optical nebular spectrum, specifically the Fe-group complexes and Ca II features (Sec 7.2, Fig B.1).
  • Viewing angle = -90 degrees
    Selected to reproduce the redshifted [Ca II] and [O I] lines and the [Fe II] tilted-top profiles (Sec 7.2, Fig 20).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The UVOIR bolometric light curve constructed from optical photometry, template SEDs, and extrapolations to 2000 Å and 20,000 Å represents the total radiated energy.
    Used in Sec 4.7 to derive MNi from the bolometric light curve.
  • domain assumption The Na I D pseudo-equivalent width to reddening relation of Poznanski et al. (2012) applies to ASASSN-20jq, despite roughly 68% intrinsic scatter.
    Adopted in Sec 4.5 to set host reddening E(B-V) = 0.091 mag.
  • domain assumption The 56Ni to 56Co to 56Fe decay chain with gamma-ray trapping fraction 1 - exp(-t0^2/t^2) and full positron deposition powers the light curve.
    Used in Sec 4.7 to fit MNi and t0_gamma.
  • ad hoc to paper The MCh high-central-density off-center DDT model 5p02822d40.16 (Hoeflich et al. 2021) is an applicable description of ASASSN-20jq.
    Model selected from a grid to match this supernova's peak brightness and decline rate; used in Sec 7.2 to interpret nebular spectra.
  • domain assumption The weak emission feature near 6350 Å is the [O I] 6300,6364 doublet redshifted by about 2200 km/s.
    Adopted in Sec 5.2 to infer oxygen emission; the paper itself rates the detection as marginal.
  • domain assumption The synthetic nebular spectrum at about +205 days can be compared directly to observed optical +229d and NIR +192d spectra because line features evolve slowly.
    Stated in Sec 7.2 to justify the phase mismatch in Fig 20.
  • domain assumption The adopted Cosmicflows-4 Tully-Fisher distance of 19.41 +/- 3.84 Mpc is accurate.
    Sets the absolute magnitude scale and the 2.5 mag outlier offset; a 20% distance error would change MB by about 0.4 mag.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Expanding the parameter space of 2002es-like type Ia supernovae: on the underluminous ASASSN-20jq / SN 2020qxp." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FIF4KZ5C

@misc{pith2026250104086,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Expanding the parameter space of 2002es-like type Ia supernovae: on the underluminous ASASSN-20jq / SN 2020qxp},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FIF4KZ5C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04086}
}
abstract

We present optical photometric and spectroscopic observations of the peculiar Type Ia supernova ASASSN-20jq/SN 2020qxp. It is a low-luminosity object with a peak absolute magnitude of $M_B=-17.1\pm0.5$ mag. Despite its low luminosity, its post-peak light-curve decline rate ($\Delta m_{15}(B)=1.35\pm0.09$ mag) and color-stretch parameter (sBV>0.82) are similar to normal SNe Ia, making it an outlier in the luminosity-width and luminosity-color-stretch relations. Early light curves suggest a "bump" during the first 1.4 days of explosion. ASASSN-20jq synthesized a low radioactive $^{56}$Ni mass of $0.09\pm0.01M_\odot$. Near-maximum light spectra reveal strong Si II absorption lines, indicating a cooler photosphere than normal SNe Ia, but lack Ti II absorption lines. Unusually strong O I $\lambda$7773 and Ca II near-infrared triplet absorption features are present. Nebular spectra show a strong, narrow forbidden [Ca II] $\lambda\lambda$7291,7324 doublet emission, rarely seen in SNe Ia except in some Type Iax events. Marginal detection of [O I] $\lambda\lambda$6300,6364 doublet emission, which is extremely rare, is observed. Both [Ca II] and [O I] lines are redshifted by $\sim2000$ km/s. A strong [Fe II] $\lambda$7155 emission line with a tilted-top profile, identical to the [Fe II] $\lambda$16433 profile, is also observed. These asymmetric [Fe II] profiles and redshifted [Ca II] and [O I] emissions suggest a high central density white dwarf progenitor undergoing an off-center delayed-detonation explosion mechanism, producing roughly equal amounts of $^{56}$Ni in deflagration and detonation phases. This distinguishes ASASSN-20jq from normal and subluminous SNe Ia. ASASSN-20jq's light curve and spectra do not align with any single SNe Ia subclass but show similarities to 2002es-like objects. Thus, we add it as an extreme candidate within the heterogeneous parameter space of 2002es-like SNe Ia.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Hawaii Infrared Supernova Study (HISS): Spectroscopic Data Release 1

    astro-ph.HE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HISS DR1 releases 90 NIR spectra of 48 transients and demonstrates spectral analyses including unburnt carbon, nebular lines, CO, and He I diagnostics.

  2. Using nebular near-IR spectroscopy to measure asymmetric chemical distributions in 2003fg-like thermonuclear supernovae

    astro-ph.SR 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    All three 2003fg-like supernovae show correlated asymmetries in their 1.257 and 1.644 micron [Fe II] profiles, implying aspherical chemical distributions in their cores.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

182 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543

    2009

  2. [2]

    2002, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Aldering, G., Adam, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2002, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 4836, Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries, ed. J. A. Tyson & S. Wolff, 61–72

    2002

  3. [3]

    Arnett, W. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785

    1982

  4. [4]

    2020, ApJL, 895, L3

    Ashall, C., Lu, J., Burns, C., et al. 2020, ApJL, 895, L3

    2020

  5. [5]

    Y ., et al

    Ashall, C., Lu, J., Hsiao, E. Y ., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 205

    2021

  6. [6]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    2009

  7. [7]

    2015, HOTPANTS: High Order Transform of PSF ANd Template

    Becker, A. 2015, HOTPANTS: High Order Transform of PSF ANd Template

    2015

  8. [8]

    2014, A&A, 568, A22

    Betoule, M., Kessler, R., Guy, J., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A22

    2014

Show all 182 references
  1. [9]

    J., Stanek, K

    Bock, G., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 8566 Botyánszki, J., Kasen, D., & Plewa, T. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 852, L6

    2016

  2. [10]

    C., Hall, N., et al

    Branch, D., Dang, L. C., Hall, N., et al. 2006, PASP, 118, 560

    2006

  3. [11]

    M., Baliber, N., Bianco, F

    Brown, T. M., Baliber, N., Bianco, F. B., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 1031

    2013

  4. [12]

    A., Sarbadhicary, S

    Burke, J., Howell, D. A., Sarbadhicary, S. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 142

    2021

  5. [13]

    R., Parent, E., Phillips, M

    Burns, C. R., Parent, E., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 56

    2018

  6. [14]

    R., Stritzinger, M., Phillips, M

    Burns, C. R., Stritzinger, M., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 32

    2014

  7. [15]

    R., Stritzinger, M., Phillips, M

    Burns, C. R., Stritzinger, M., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 19

    2011

  8. [16]

    2020, ApJ, 901, 154

    Burrow, A., Baron, E., Ashall, C., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 154

    2020

  9. [17]

    R., Gal-Yam, A., et al

    Cao, Y ., Kulkarni, S. R., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832, 86

    2016

  10. [18]

    R., Howell, D

    Cao, Y ., Kulkarni, S. R., Howell, D. A., et al. 2015, Nature, 521, 328

    2015

  11. [19]

    M., Chevalier, R

    Chomiuk, L., Soderberg, A. M., Chevalier, R. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 119 Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodré, L., Stasi ´nska, G., & Gomes, J. M. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 363

    2016

  12. [20]

    A., Howes, A., et al

    Conley, A., Howell, D. A., Howes, A., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1707

    2006

  13. [21]

    M., et al

    Contreras, C., Hamuy, M., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 519

    2010

  14. [22]

    R., Hoeflich, P., Hsiao, E

    Diamond, T. R., Hoeflich, P., Hsiao, E. Y ., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 119

    2018

  15. [23]

    J., Tonry, J

    Do, A., Shappee, B. J., Tonry, J. L., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 624

    2025

  16. [24]

    A., Kewley, L

    Dopita, M. A., Kewley, L. J., Sutherland, R. S., & Nicholls, D. C. 2016, Ap&SS, 361, 61

    2016

  17. [25]

    Doull, B. A. & Baron, E. 2011, PASP, 123, 765

    2011

  18. [26]

    A., Magnier, E

    Flewelling, H. A., Magnier, E. A., Chambers, K. C., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 7

    2020

  19. [27]

    M., et al

    Folatelli, G., Morrell, N., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 53

    2013

  20. [28]

    M., Morrell, N., et al

    Folatelli, G., Phillips, M. M., Morrell, N., et al. 2012, ApJ, 745, 74

    2012

  21. [29]

    J., Challis, P

    Foley, R. J., Challis, P. J., Chornock, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 57

    2013

  22. [30]

    J., Narayan, G., Challis, P

    Foley, R. J., Narayan, G., Challis, P. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1748

    2010

  23. [31]

    L., Burns, C

    Freedman, W. L., Burns, C. R., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1036

    2009

  24. [32]

    L., Madore, B

    Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., et al. 2001, ApJ, 553, 47

    2001

  25. [33]

    P., Sánchez, S

    Galbany, L., Anderson, J. P., Sánchez, S. F., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 107

    2018

  26. [34]

    2019, A&A, 630, A76

    Galbany, L., Ashall, C., Höflich, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A76

    2019

  27. [35]

    D., Ashall, C., et al

    Gall, C., Stritzinger, M. D., Ashall, C., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A58

    2018

  28. [36]

    N., Khokhlov, A

    Gamezo, V . N., Khokhlov, A. M., Oran, E. S., Chtchelkanova, A. Y ., & Rosen- berg, R. O. 2003, Science, 299, 77

    2003

  29. [37]

    Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., & Filippenko, A. V . 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2607

    2011

  30. [38]

    Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., & Filippenko, A. V . 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2240

    2013

  31. [39]

    V ., et al

    Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V ., et al. 2010, ApJS, 190, 418

    2010

  32. [40]

    V ., et al

    Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V ., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 142

    2012

  33. [41]

    E., Kim, A., et al

    Goldhaber, G., Groom, D. E., Kim, A., et al. 2001, ApJ, 558, 359 Gómez, G. & López, R. 1998, AJ, 115, 1096

    2001

  34. [42]

    2007, A&A, 466, 11

    Guy, J., Astier, P., Baumont, S., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 11

    2007

  35. [43]

    2006, Statistics and computing, 16, 339

    Haario, H., Laine, M., Mira, A., & Saksman, E. 2006, Statistics and computing, 16, 339

    2006

  36. [44]

    2001, Bernoulli, 223

    Haario, H., Saksman, E., & Tamminen, J. 2001, Bernoulli, 223

    2001

  37. [45]

    M., Maza, J., et al

    Hamuy, M., Phillips, M. M., Maza, J., et al. 1994, AJ, 108, 2226

    1994

  38. [46]

    M., Maza, J., et al

    Hamuy, M., Phillips, M. M., Maza, J., et al. 1995, AJ, 109, 1

    1995

  39. [47]

    M., Suntzeff, N

    Hamuy, M., Phillips, M. M., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 2003, Nature, 424, 651

    2003

  40. [48]

    2009, ApJ, 700, 331

    Hicken, M., Challis, P., Jha, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 331

    2009

  41. [49]

    M., Prieto, J

    Hicken, M., Garnavich, P. M., Prieto, J. L., et al. 2007, ApJL, 669, L17

    2007

  42. [50]

    1990, A&A, 229, 191

    Hoeflich, P. 1990, A&A, 229, 191

    1990

  43. [51]

    2021, ApJ, 922, 186

    Hoeflich, P., Ashall, C., Bose, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 186

    2021

  44. [52]

    Y ., Ashall, C., et al

    Hoeflich, P., Hsiao, E. Y ., Ashall, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 58

    2017

  45. [53]

    & Khokhlov, A

    Hoeflich, P. & Khokhlov, A. 1996, ApJ, 457, 500

    1996

  46. [54]

    M., & Wheeler, J

    Hoeflich, P., Khokhlov, A. M., & Wheeler, J. C. 1995, ApJ, 444, 831

    1995

  47. [55]

    1993, A&A, 268, 570 Höflich, P

    Hoeflich, P., Mueller, E., & Khokhlov, A. 1993, A&A, 268, 570 Höflich, P. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 288, Stellar Atmosphere Modeling, ed. I. Hubeny, D. Mihalas, & K. Werner, 371 Höflich, P. 2009, in American Institute of Physics Conf...

    1993

  48. [56]

    2019, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 12661, 1

    Holmbo, S., Stritzinger, M., Nowack, G., et al. 2019, The Astronomer’s Tele- gram, 12661, 1

    2019

  49. [57]

    W.-S., Brown, J

    Holoien, T. W.-S., Brown, J. S., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4966

    2017

  50. [58]

    B., Shappee, B

    Hoogendam, W. B., Shappee, B. J., Brown, P. J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 139

    2024

  51. [59]

    J., Valenti, S., et al

    Hosseinzadeh, G., Sand, D. J., Valenti, S., et al. 2017, ApJL, 845, L11

    2017

  52. [60]

    A., Sullivan, M., Nugent, P

    Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Nugent, P. E., et al. 2006, Nature, 443, 308

    2006

  53. [61]

    Y ., Burns, C

    Hsiao, E. Y ., Burns, C. R., Contreras, C., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A9

    2015

  54. [62]

    Y ., Hoeflich, P., Ashall, C., et al

    Hsiao, E. Y ., Hoeflich, P., Ashall, C., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 140

    2020

  55. [63]

    Hubble, E. P. 1926, ApJ, 64, 321

    1926

  56. [64]

    & Tutukov, A

    Iben, I., J. & Tutukov, A. V . 1984, ApJS, 54, 335 Jacobson-Galán, W. V ., Polin, A., Foley, R. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 165

    1984

  57. [65]

    J., Fraser, M., et al

    Jerkstrand, A., Smartt, S. J., Fraser, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 3694

    2014

  58. [66]

    P., Challis, P., et al

    Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., Challis, P., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 527

    2006

  59. [67]

    G., & Kirshner, R

    Jha, S., Riess, A. G., & Kirshner, R. P. 2007, ApJ, 659, 122

    2007

  60. [68]

    W., Maguire, K., & Sullivan, M

    Jha, S. W., Maguire, K., & Sullivan, M. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 706

    2019

  61. [69]

    2017, Nature, 550, 80

    Jiang, J.-A., Doi, M., Maeda, K., et al. 2017, Nature, 550, 80

    2017

  62. [70]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 1025

    Kasen, D. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1025

    2010

  63. [71]

    C., & Nugent, P

    Kasen, D., Thomas, R. C., & Nugent, P. 2006, ApJ, 651, 366

    2006

  64. [72]

    2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1301.6766

    Katz, B., Kushnir, D., & Dong, S. 2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1301.6766

    2013 arXiv

  65. [73]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 541

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541

    1998

  66. [74]

    2001, in APS Meeting Abstracts, V ol

    Khokhlov, A. 2001, in APS Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 46, APS Meeting Abstracts, C3.003

    2001

  67. [75]

    S., Shappee, B

    Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502

    2017

  68. [76]

    R., et al

    Krisciunas, K., Contreras, C., Burns, C. R., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 211

    2017

  69. [77]

    H., Suntzeff, N

    Krisciunas, K., Marion, G. H., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 1584

    2009

  70. [78]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, 4428

    Kromer, M., Fremling, C., Pakmor, R., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 4428

    2016

  71. [79]

    Y ., Ashall, C., et al

    Kumar, S., Hsiao, E. Y ., Ashall, C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 27

    2023

  72. [80]

    A., Siebert, M

    Kwok, L. A., Siebert, M. R., Johansson, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 135

    2024

  73. [81]

    C., Leising, M

    Lair, J. C., Leising, M. D., Milne, P. A., & Williams, G. G. 2006, AJ, 132, 2024

    2006

  74. [82]

    P., Phillips, M

    Leibundgut, B., Kirshner, R. P., Phillips, M. M., et al. 1993, AJ, 105, 301

    1993

  75. [83]

    D., et al

    Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3

    1999

  76. [84]

    D., Sollerman, J., et al

    Leloudas, G., Stritzinger, M. D., Sollerman, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 265

    2009

  77. [85]

    & Soker, N

    Levanon, N. & Soker, N. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 2510

    2017

  78. [86]

    & McCray, R

    Li, H. & McCray, R. 1992, ApJ, 387, 309

    1992

  79. [87]

    V ., Chornock, R., et al

    Li, W., Filippenko, A. V ., Chornock, R., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 453

    2003

  80. [88]

    V ., Gates, E., et al

    Li, W., Filippenko, A. V ., Gates, E., et al. 2001, PASP, 113, 1178

    2001

  81. [89]

    2023, ApJ, 950, 17

    Li, Z., Zhang, T., Wang, X., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 17

    2023

  82. [90]

    R., et al

    Liu, Z.-W., Pakmor, R., Seitenzahl, I. R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 37

    2013

  83. [91]

    K., & Han, Z

    Liu, Z.-W., Röpke, F. K., & Han, Z. 2023, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics, 23, 082001

    2023

  84. [92]

    & Arnett, D

    Livne, E. & Arnett, D. 1995, ApJ, 452, 62

    1995

  85. [93]

    A., et al

    Lundqvist, P., Kundu, E., Pérez-Torres, M. A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 159

    2020

  86. [94]

    2015, A&A, 577, A39

    Lundqvist, P., Nyholm, A., Taddia, F., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A39

    2015

  87. [95]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 1897

    Maeda, K., Jiang, J.-a., Doi, M., Kawabata, M., & Shigeyama, T. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1897

    2023

  88. [96]

    2014, ApJ, 794, 37

    Maeda, K., Kutsuna, M., & Shigeyama, T. 2014, ApJ, 794, 37

    2014

  89. [97]

    R., Sim, S

    Magee, M. R., Sim, S. A., Kotak, R., & Kerzendorf, W. E. 2018, A&A, 614, A115

    2018

  90. [98]

    C., et al

    Maguire, K., Sullivan, M., Thomas, R. C., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 747

    2011

  91. [99]

    S., Narayan, G., & Kirshner, R

    Mandel, K. S., Narayan, G., & Kirshner, R. P. 2011, ApJ, 731, 120

    2011

  92. [100]

    S., Scolnic, D

    Mandel, K. S., Scolnic, D. M., Shariff, H., Foley, R. J., & Kirshner, R. P. 2017, ApJ, 842, 93

    2017

  93. [101]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 107

    Maoz, D., Mannucci, F., & Nelemans, G. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 107

    2014

  94. [102]

    P., Challis, P., et al

    Matheson, T., Kirshner, R. P., Challis, P., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1598

    2008

  95. [103]

    A., Benetti, S., Stritzinger, M., & Ashall, C

    Mazzali, P. A., Benetti, S., Stritzinger, M., & Ashall, C. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 5560

    2022

  96. [104]

    A., Chugai, N., Turatto, M., et al

    Mazzali, P. A., Chugai, N., Turatto, M., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 151

    1997

  97. [105]

    A., Danziger, I

    Mazzali, P. A., Danziger, I. J., & Turatto, M. 1995, A&A, 297, 509

    1995

  98. [106]

    W., Foley, R

    McCully, C., Jha, S. W., Foley, R. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 134

    2014

  99. [107]

    A., Magee, M

    Miller, A. A., Magee, M. R., Polin, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 56

    2020

  100. [108]

    J., Mazzali, P

    Moriya, T. J., Mazzali, P. A., Ashall, C., & Pian, E. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 6035

    2023

  101. [109]

    M., Folatelli, G., et al

    Morrell, N., Phillips, M. M., Folatelli, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 20

    2024

  102. [110]

    2013, New A, 20, 30

    Munari, U., Henden, A., Belligoli, R., et al. 2013, New A, 20, 30

    2013

  103. [111]

    1982, ApJ, 257, 780

    Nomoto, K. 1982, ApJ, 257, 780

    1982

  104. [112]

    2002, PASP, 114, 803

    Nugent, P., Kim, A., & Perlmutter, S. 2002, PASP, 114, 803

    2002

  105. [113]

    1995, ApJL, 455, L147

    Nugent, P., Phillips, M., Baron, E., Branch, D., & Hauschildt, P. 1995, ApJL, 455, L147

    1995

  106. [114]

    K., et al

    Pakmor, R., Kromer, M., Röpke, F. K., et al. 2010, Nature, 463, 61

    2010

  107. [115]

    2012, ApJL, 747, L10

    Pakmor, R., Kromer, M., Taubenberger, S., et al. 2012, ApJL, 747, L10

    2012

  108. [116]

    T., Thomas, R

    Parrent, J. T., Thomas, R. C., Fesen, R. A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 30

    2011

  109. [117]

    A., Cox, N

    Patat, F., Cordiner, M. A., Cox, N. L. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A62

    2013

  110. [118]

    C., Aldering, G., et al

    Pereira, R., Thomas, R. C., Aldering, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A27

    2013

  111. [119]

    1999, ApJ, 517, 565 Article number, page 21 of 27 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 565 Article number, page 21 of 27 A&A proofs: manuscript no. ms

    1999

  112. [120]

    & Pagel, B

    Pettini, M. & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59

    2004

  113. [121]

    Phillips, M. M. 1993, ApJL, 413, L105

    1993

  114. [122]

    M., Ashall, C., Brown, P

    Phillips, M. M., Ashall, C., Brown, P. J., et al. 2024, ApJS, 273, 16

    2024

  115. [123]

    M., Ashall, C., Burns, C

    Phillips, M. M., Ashall, C., Burns, C. R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 47

    2022

  116. [124]

    M., Contreras, C., Hsiao, E

    Phillips, M. M., Contreras, C., Hsiao, E. Y ., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 014001

    2019

  117. [125]

    M., Lira, P., Suntzeff, N

    Phillips, M. M., Lira, P., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1766

    1999

  118. [126]

    M., Phillips, A

    Phillips, M. M., Phillips, A. C., Heathcote, S. R., et al. 1987, PASP, 99, 592

    1987

  119. [127]

    M., Simon, J

    Phillips, M. M., Simon, J. D., Morrell, N., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 38

    2013

  120. [128]

    M., Wells, L

    Phillips, M. M., Wells, L. A., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 1992, AJ, 103, 1632

    1992

  121. [129]

    Piro, A. L. & Morozova, V . S. 2016, ApJ, 826, 96

    2016

  122. [130]

    W., Atwood, B., Brewer, D

    Pogge, R. W., Atwood, B., Brewer, D. F., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 7735, Ground- based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 77350A

    2010

  123. [131]

    X., & Bloom, J

    Poznanski, D., Prochaska, J. X., & Bloom, J. S. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1465

    2012

  124. [132]

    Pskovskii, I. P. 1977, Soviet Ast., 21, 675

    1977

  125. [133]

    Richmond, M. W. & Smith, H. A. 2012, JAA VSO, 40, 872

    2012

  126. [134]

    G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al

    Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., et al. 2021, ApJL, 908, L6

    2021

  127. [135]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V ., Challis, P., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1009

    1998

  128. [136]

    G., Kirshner, R

    Riess, A. G., Kirshner, R. P., Schmidt, B. P., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 707

    1999

  129. [137]

    G., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Macri, L. M., Hoffmann, S. L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 56 Rodríguez, Ó., Maoz, D., & Nakar, E. 2023, ApJ, 955, 71

    2016

  130. [138]

    Russell, S. C. & Dopita, M. A. 1992, ApJ, 384, 508

    1992

  131. [139]

    K., Tanaka, M., Anupama, G

    Sahu, D. K., Tanaka, M., Anupama, G. C., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 580

    2008

  132. [140]

    C., et al

    Sako, M., Bassett, B., Becker, A. C., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 064002

    2018

  133. [141]

    A., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al

    Scalzo, R. A., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, 1073

    2010

  134. [142]

    A., Parent, E., Burns, C., et al

    Scalzo, R. A., Parent, E., Burns, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 628

    2019

  135. [143]

    Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    2011

  136. [144]

    P., Suntzeff, N

    Schmidt, B. P., Suntzeff, N. B., Phillips, M. M., et al. 1998, ApJ, 507, 46

    1998

  137. [145]

    M., Jones, D

    Scolnic, D. M., Jones, D. O., Rest, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 101 SDSS Collaboration. 2017, ApJS, 233, 25

    2018

  138. [146]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

    2014

  139. [147]

    & Kushnir, D

    Sharon, A. & Kushnir, D. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 4517

    2020

  140. [148]

    J., Tully, R

    Shaya, E. J., Tully, R. B., Hoffman, Y ., & Pomarède, D. 2017, ApJ, 850, 207

    2017

  141. [149]

    J., Kasen, D., Miles, B

    Shen, K. J., Kasen, D., Miles, B. J., & Townsley, D. M. 2018, ApJ, 854, 52

    2018

  142. [150]

    R., Foley, R

    Siebert, M. R., Foley, R. J., Zenati, Y ., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 173

    2023

  143. [151]

    M., Foley, R

    Silverman, J. M., Foley, R. J., Filippenko, A. V ., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1789

    2012

  144. [152]

    2023, ApJL, 956, L34

    Srivastav, S., Moore, T., Nicholl, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 956, L34

    2023

  145. [153]

    & Ashall, C

    Stritzinger, M. & Ashall, C. 2020, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2020-2505, 1

    2020

  146. [154]

    R., Phillips, M

    Stritzinger, M., Burns, C. R., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 2036

    2010

  147. [155]

    B., et al

    Stritzinger, M., Hamuy, M., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2100

    2002

  148. [156]

    & Sollerman, J

    Stritzinger, M. & Sollerman, J. 2007, A&A, 470, L1

    2007

  149. [157]

    D., Hsiao, E., Valenti, S., et al

    Stritzinger, M. D., Hsiao, E., Valenti, S., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A146

    2014

  150. [158]

    D., Phillips, M

    Stritzinger, M. D., Phillips, M. M., Boldt, L. N., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 156

    2011

  151. [159]

    D., Taddia, F., Burns, C

    Stritzinger, M. D., Taddia, F., Burns, C. R., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A135

    2018

  152. [160]

    D., Valenti, S., Hoeflich, P., et al

    Stritzinger, M. D., Valenti, S., Hoeflich, P., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A2

    2015

  153. [161]

    2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed

    Taubenberger, S. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, ed. A. W. Alsabti & P. Mur- din, 317

    2017

  154. [162]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 5473

    Taubenberger, S., Floers, A., V ogl, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5473

    2019

  155. [163]

    2013, ApJL, 775, L43

    Taubenberger, S., Kromer, M., Pakmor, R., et al. 2013, ApJL, 775, L43

    2013

  156. [164]

    C., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al

    Thomas, R. C., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 27

    2011

  157. [165]

    K., Sahu, D

    Tiwari, S., Chakradhari, N. K., Sahu, D. K., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 5207

    2023

  158. [166]

    L., Stubbs, C

    Tonry, J. L., Stubbs, C. W., Lykke, K. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 99

    2012

  159. [167]

    A., Ashall, C., Shappee, B

    Tucker, M. A., Ashall, C., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 50

    2021

  160. [168]

    1996, MNRAS, 283, 1

    Turatto, M., Benetti, S., Cappellaro, E., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 1

    1996

  161. [169]

    V ., Ganeshalingam, M., et al

    Wang, X., Filippenko, A. V ., Ganeshalingam, M., et al. 2009, ApJL, 699, L139

    2009

  162. [170]

    Webbink, R. F. 1984, ApJ, 277, 355

    1984

  163. [171]

    J., Kasliwal, M

    White, C. J., Kasliwal, M. M., Nugent, P. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 52

    2015

  164. [172]

    D., Hillier, D

    Wilk, K. D., Hillier, D. J., & Dessart, L. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2221

    2020

  165. [173]

    Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. 1994, ApJ, 423, 371

    1994

  166. [174]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 3951

    Wygoda, N., Elbaz, Y ., & Katz, B. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 3951

    2019

  167. [175]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 9957

    Xi, G., Wang, X., Li, G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 9957

    2024

  168. [176]

    S., Kinugasa, K., et al

    Yamanaka, M., Kawabata, K. S., Kinugasa, K., et al. 2009, ApJL, 707, L118

    2009

  169. [177]

    & Gal-Yam, A

    Yaron, O. & Gal-Yam, A. 2012, PASP, 124, 668

    2012

  170. [178]

    2016, ApJ, 820, 67

    Zhang, K., Wang, X., Zhang, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 67

    2016

  171. [179]

    2016, ApJ, 826, 211

    Zhao, X., Maeda, K., Wang, X., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 211

    2016

  172. [180]

    L., & Filippenko, A

    Zheng, W., Kelly, P. L., & Filippenko, A. V . 2018, ApJ, 858, 104 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark (e-mail: email@subhashbose.com, max@phys.au.dk ) 2 Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 W. 18th

    2018

  173. [181]

    Appendix A: Optical Broad-band Photometry of ASASSN-20jq Table A.1 lists the optical broad-band photometry of ASASSN-20jq

    Bose, Stritzinger et al.: The underluminous type-Ia SN ASASSN-20jq. Appendix A: Optical Broad-band Photometry of ASASSN-20jq Table A.1 lists the optical broad-band photometry of ASASSN-20jq. Table A.1. Photometry of ASASSN-20jq. UT Date JD − Phasea B V g r i z Telescopeb 2,459...

    2020

  174. [182]

    Bose, Stritzinger et al.: The underluminous type-Ia SN ASASSN-20jq. Notes. (a) Rest-frame days relative to the epoch of B-band maximum, i.e., JD 2,459,085.8. (b) The abbreviations for the telescope/instrument are: ASASSN - ASAS-SN quadruple 14cm telescopes; ATLAS-O - ATLAS sur...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.