Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Functoriality of Coulomb branches

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For gluable maps H to G, the Coulomb branch of the restricted representation is the balanced product of the Coulomb branches for H and G; this proves the parabolic base affine space for GL_n or SL_n is a quiver Coulomb branch.

desk verdict A real new functoriality theorem for Coulomb branches with a high-value application, but the proof of the headline conjecture is missing a gluability check that is likely an easy fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09962 v3 pith:NXKIYACW submitted 2025-01-17 math.AG math.QAmath.RT

Tom Gannon , Ben Webster This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.QAmath.RT MSC 14L3014M1714B05
keywords CoulombbranchesquivergaugetheoriesparabolicbaseaffinespacepartialimplosionsHamiltonianreductionGrassmanniansymplecticsingularitiestransverseslices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a functoriality principle for Coulomb branches, the symplectic varieties that the standard Coulomb branch construction attaches to a reductive group and a representation. For a map $H \to G$ of reductive groups and a representation of $G$ satisfying a mild 'gluable' condition, the Coulomb branch for the restricted representation of $H$ is canonically a balanced product of the Coulomb branch for $H$ with zero representation and the Coulomb branch for $G$, taken over the group scheme $M_C(G,0)$. This makes Coulomb branches behave as a kind of contravariant construction under Hamiltonian reduction. Two consequences follow: the affine closure of the cotangent bundle of the parabolic base affine space of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ or $\mathrm{SL}_n$ is a Coulomb branch of a quiver gauge theory, settling a standing conjecture, and the coordinate rings of these spaces are finitely generated.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the gluable condition on a map of pairs $(\tilde{H},H) \to (\tilde{G},G)$ (Definition 2.6): no two weights $\xi_1$, $\xi_2$ of the representation $N$ restrict to proportional characters on the maximal torus $T_H$ and take opposite signs on some cocharacter of $G$. This condition ensures that the Euler classes $\varphi_\ell$ and $\varphi_r$ attached to the two tautological bundles on the affine Grassmannian are coprime after restriction to the torus of $H$; coprimality makes the associated graded exact sequence (2.8) exact, and that is what forces the map from the balanced product to be an isomorphism. The argument runs through the Coulomb gluing property (Definition 2.3), a pushout description of the deformed Coulomb branch: its ring of functions consists of the functions on the $N=0$ Coulomb branch whose pullback by a rational automorphism $\varpi_N$ stays regular, a property the paper proves by refining a known theorem for the triple $(G \times G^{\mathrm{sc}}_m, G, N)$.

What would settle it

Compute the balanced product and the Coulomb branch for the inclusion $\mathrm{SL}_n \subset \mathrm{GL}_n$ with $N$ the direct sum of the standard representation and its dual: the weights $e_i$ and $-e_i$ restrict proportionally to the torus of $\mathrm{SL}_n$ and have opposite signs on a cocharacter of $\mathrm{GL}_n$, so the map is not gluable. If the two varieties are not isomorphic in this example, the gluable condition is necessary; if they are isomorphic, that supports the conjecture that the condition can be dropped.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 1.1: if $\varsigma: H \to G$ is a map of complex reductive groups that is gluable for a representation $N$ of $G$, then there is a canonical $M_C(H,0)$-equivariant isomorphism $$M_C(H,0) \$times^{{M_C(G,0)}}$ M_C(G,N) \cong M_C(H,N)$$ of affine varieties over $\mathfrak{h}//H$. The balanced product realizes the right side as the Hamiltonian reduction of the product of the $H$-Coulomb branch for the zero representation and the $G$-Coulomb branch for $N$. The proof upgrades a gluing description of Coulomb branch rings from the literature: the gluable condition says that the Euler classes of two tautological bundles on the affine Grassmannian have no common factor after restriction to the torus of $H$, which makes the associated graded of the relevant exact sequence exact. From this, the paper derives that the Coulomb branch of any loopless quiver is determined by Coulomb branches of two-vertex quivers, and that the affine closures $T^*(\mathrm{GL}_n/U_P)$ and $T^*(\mathrm{SL}_n/U_P)$ are quiver Coulomb branches, confirming the partial implosion conjecture.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing hypothesis is that no two weights of the representation restrict to proportional functions on the torus of $H$ and take opposite signs on some cocharacter of $G$; the authors themselves believe this 'gluable' condition is probably unnecessary, but the proof as written needs it to make the key exact sequence exact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If a quiver $Q$ has no loops and every pair of parallel edges lifts to parallel edges in a dismemberment $\hat{Q}$, the Coulomb branch $M(Q,n)$ is the balanced product of $M(G(Q,n))$ and $M(\hat{Q},\hat{n})$ over $M(G(\hat{Q},\hat{n}))$; iterating, every loopless quiver Coulomb branch is built from two-vertex quivers.
  • The affine closures $T^*(\mathrm{GL}_n/U_P)$ and $T^*(\mathrm{SL}_n/U_P)$ are quiver Coulomb branches (Theorems 1.7 and 3.3), so they have symplectic singularities, Gorenstein rational singularities, and a finite stratification into holomorphic symplectic subvarieties.
  • The coordinate rings of these affine closures are finitely generated, a nontrivial fact because each is the invariant ring of a finitely generated algebra under a unipotent group.
  • The affine closure $T^*(G/U_P)$ is independent of the ordering of the ordered partition $\vec{m}$ of $n$.
  • Fission of a loopless quiver: the Coulomb branch of the fissioned quiver is the balanced product of the Coulomb branch of the original quiver with the Coulomb branch of the fissioned group over the original gauge group (Corollary 3.2).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gluable condition is shown unnecessary, the balanced product formula would apply to arbitrary maps of reductive groups and arbitrary quiver dismemberments, making the Hamiltonian-reduction description fully general; a natural test case is the $\mathrm{SL}_n \subset \mathrm{GL}_n$ inclusion with $N = V \oplus V^*$, where the condition fails.
  • The balanced product formula suggests a compositional structure on Coulomb branches: it behaves like a lax functor from reductive pairs to symplectic varieties, so the fission and dismemberment operations could be seen as instances of a single gluing law rather than separate constructions.
  • The gluing law connects to the conjectural S-duality framework for Hamiltonian spaces: if the S-dual of a Hamiltonian $G$-space is recovered from the Coulomb branch via the universal centralizer action, then the balanced product would give a geometric recipe for S-duals of cotangent-bundle spaces.
  • The proof shows that the gluable condition can be read off from weight combinatorics alone, so for any concrete quiver and dimension vector one can algorithmically decide which dismemberments are admissible, which would make the reduction to two-vertex quivers machine-checkable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: The central discovery is Theorem 1.1: if $\varsigma: H \to G$ is a map of complex reductive groups that is gluable for a representation $N$ of $G$, then there is a canonical $M_C(H,0)$-equivariant isomorphism $$M_C(H,0) \$times^{{M_C(G,0)}}$ M_C(G,N) \cong M_C(H,N)$$ of affine varieties over $\mathfrak{h}//H$. The balanced product realizes the right side as the Hamiltonian reduction of the product

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves a functoriality theorem for Coulomb branches of 3d N=4 gauge theories: for a map H→G of complex reductive groups and a representation N satisfying a hypothesis called gluable (Definition 2.6), the Coulomb branch M_C(H,N) is canonically isomorphic to the balanced product M_C(H,0) ×^{M_C(G,0)} M_C(G,N) over the invariant adjoint quotient h//H (Theorem 1.1). The theorem is applied to show that Coulomb branches of loopless quivers are determined by two-vertex quivers (Corollary 1.5) and to prove the Bourget–Dancer–Grimminger–Hanany–Zhong conjecture for GL_n and SL_n: the affine closure of T*(G/U_P) is isomorphic to an explicit quiver Coulomb branch (Theorem 3.3 and Theorem 1.7). The proof includes a reproof of Teleman's Coulomb-gluing theorem and an appendix connecting the results to derived geometric Satake and relative Langlands duality.

Significance. If the main results hold, the paper introduces a genuinely new structural tool for Coulomb branches—expressing a Coulomb branch as a Hamiltonian reduction of a balanced product—and settles a conjecture of Bourget–Dancer–Grimminger–Hanany–Zhong. The consequences are substantial: finite generation of functions on T*(G/U_P) for GL_n and SL_n, symplectic singularities, holomorphic symplectic stratifications, and independence of the ordering of the partition. A notable strength is that the central functoriality theorem is proved in the paper, including a reproof of Teleman's theorem rather than merely importing it; the gluable hypothesis is stated explicitly, and the authors are honest in Remark 1.3 that they expect it to be unnecessary. The main weakness is that the key application in Theorem 3.3 does not verify the gluable hypothesis for the specific map used, leaving the proof of the headline conjecture conditional on an unstated check.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, proof of Theorem 3.3] The isomorphism (3.5) is obtained by applying Theorem 1.1 to the map GL_Q_m/Gm → (GL_A_m × GL_A_n)/Gm, but the gluable condition of Definition 2.6 is never verified for this map. Lemma 3.1 verifies gluability for quiver dismemberments GL(V_Q) → GL(V_ˇQ), yet the map used here is a map to a product of two quiver gauge groups and is not shown to be a dismemberment covered by that lemma. Since Theorem 1.1 is conditional on gluability and Remark 1.3 concedes the hypothesis may be unnecessary, the proof of Theorem 1.7 currently relies on an unproven special case. The check is finite and explicit—the weights are coordinate characters—so the authors should either verify Definition 2.6 for this map, or prove a sufficiently general version of Theorem 1.1 without the gluability assumption, or explain precisely why Lemma 3.1 applies.
  2. [§2.2, proof of Theorem 2.8] The proof of exactness of the sequence (2.8) is compressed at a load-bearing point. The claim that conditions (1) and (2) of Definition 2.6 'exactly guarantee that these have no common factors after restriction to O(˜t_H)' is stated for Euler classes built from all weights, but condition (1) allows proportionality by an arbitrary rational α, and the Euler classes are products of linear factors with multiplicities. The authors should spell out why the rational proportionality cannot create a common factor when the sign condition (2) holds, and why the associated-graded exactness implies exactness of (2.8) without additional flatness or finiteness conditions on the Schubert filtration.
  3. [§2.4, proof of Theorem 2.13] The colimit argument used to prove that the map ˜f_{ς,N} is an isomorphism is abbreviated. The sentence 'Quotienting by fM(G) and using the fact that colimits commute with colimits, the fact that ς′`ς′`ς′ is an isomorphism immediately follows...' skips the details of why the quotient of the pushout by the fM(G)-action is the desired balanced product, and why the relevant colimits are well-behaved in the category of affine schemes. This is a central step in establishing Theorem 1.1, so it needs a fuller justification or a reference to a standard colimit argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The quiver diagrams for Q_⃗m and A_⃗m in Section 1.3 and Section 3.3 are barely legible in the plain-text rendering; a properly typeset diagram or an explicit description of the vertex and edge sets would greatly aid the reader.
  2. [Definition 2.6] The notation ⟨ξ_i|μ⟩ for the pairing of a weight and a cocharacter is used without defining the pairing; please add a sentence explaining it is the natural perfect pairing between the character lattice and cocharacter lattice.
  3. [Corollary 1.5] The balanced product in (1.5) is written with g(ˇQ,n)//G(ˇQ,n), while the general construction in (1.1) uses the notation g//G for the invariant adjoint quotient; the notation should be harmonized.
  4. [Remark 2.11] There is a typo: 'necessarily changes' should be 'necessary changes'.
  5. [Appendix A.2] The proof of Lemma 3.5 relies on several imported results ([13, Theorem 2.11], [6], [26, Proposition 3.3]) and would benefit from a sentence explaining how the central isogeny pullback is compatible with the algebra-object base change, since this is the step that produces the isomorphisms in (A.7) for the GL_n and L cases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; the functoriality theorem is proved internally, but the conjecture application depends on a self-citation and an unverified gluability check, so the low score reflects dependencies rather than circularity.

full rationale

Theorem 1.1 is not assumed: it is proved internally via the associated-graded argument in Theorem 2.8, which also derives the Coulomb gluing property and extends Teleman's theorem. Corollary 1.5 follows from Theorem 1.1 after Lemma 3.1 checks gluability for dismemberments. The proof of Theorem 3.3 contains the self-citation "but the main result of [25] shows that the right hand side of (3.6) is isomorphic to T *(SLn /UP ), as desired" ([25] is the first author's prior IMRN paper); this is load-bearing for the Bourget-Dancer-Grimminger-Hanany-Zhong application, but it is an external published result with stated assumptions independent of the present conjecture, so it is a dependency, not a circular reduction. The other flagged issue is not circular either: "Applying Theorem 1.1 for the map GLQ_mbar/Gm → (GLA_mbar × GLAn)/Gm one obtains an isomorphism (3.5)" does not include an explicit verification of Definition 2.6; Lemma 3.1 covers dismemberments, and this map is not shown to be one, while Remark 1.3 concedes the gluability hypothesis is "likely ... not necessary". This makes Theorem 3.3 conditional on an unstated check, which is a correctness risk, not evidence that a prediction reduces to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted; the paper is a pure mathematical proof. It relies on the BFN construction, Teleman's gluing theorem, the ring object results of BFN and Bezrukavnikov-Finkelberg, and the first author's prior paper [25] for the final identification in Theorem 3.3. The gluable condition is a new technical hypothesis stated explicitly in Definition 2.6.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Existence and basic properties of Coulomb branches M_C(G,N) as defined by Braverman-Finkelberg-Nakajima
    Used throughout, e.g., flatness over c_G ([14, Lemma 5.3]), Hamiltonian F^∨ action ([14, Section 3(v)]), and finite generation ([14, Proposition 6.8]).
  • standard math Teleman's theorem [42, Theorem 1]: the triple (G × G^sc_m, G, N) has the Coulomb gluing property
    Reproved in Section 2.3 as a special case of Theorem 2.8; serves as the base gluing statement.
  • ad hoc to paper Gluable condition (Definition 2.6) is satisfied in the cases considered
    The main theorem is conditional on this new hypothesis introduced by the authors. They conjecture it is unnecessary (Remark 1.3), so the theorem's scope depends on it.
  • domain assumption Main result of [25] (Gannon): (K_{S(L)} x K_{SL_n})/J_{SL_n} is isomorphic to T^*(SL_n/U_P)
    Cited in the proof of Theorem 3.3 to identify the Hamiltonian reduction with the partial implosion. This is a self-cited prior paper by the first author.
  • standard math Ring object and geometric Satake equivalences from [13, Theorem 2.11], [6], and [27] used in Appendix A
    Used to prove Lemma 3.5, identifying various K_G as Coulomb branches and providing equivariant isomorphisms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Functoriality of Coulomb branches." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NXKIYACW

@misc{pith2026250109962,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Functoriality of Coulomb branches},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NXKIYACW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09962}
}
abstract

We prove that the affine closure of the cotangent bundle of the parabolic base affine space for $\mathrm{GL}_n$ or $\mathrm{SL}_n$ is a Coulomb branch, which confirms a conjecture of Bourget-Dancer-Grimminger-Hanany-Zhong. In particular, we show that the algebra of functions on the cotangent bundle of the parabolic base affine space of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ or $\mathrm{SL}_n$ is finitely generated. We prove this by showing that, if we are given a map $H \to G$ of complex reductive groups and a representation of $G$ satisfying an assumption we call gluable, then the Coulomb branch for the induced representation of $H$ is obtained from the corresponding Coulomb branch for $G$ by a certain Hamiltonian reduction procedure. In particular, we show that the Coulomb branch associated to any quiver with no loops can be obtained from Coulomb branches associated to quivers with exactly two vertices using this procedure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the geometry of Coulomb branches

    math.AG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Coulomb branches are affinizations of explicit blowups of toric compactifications, and their symplectic leaves are indexed by flats of the weight hyperplane arrangement, controlled by zero-dimensional leaves of residu...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [25]

    The Cotangent Bundle of G/UP and Kostant–Whittaker Descent

    Tom Gannon. “The Cotangent Bundle of G/UP and Kostant–Whittaker Descent”. International Math- ematics Research Notices 2025.2 (2025). doi: 10.1093/imrn/rnae285 . eprint: https://academic. oup.com/imrn/article-pdf/2025/2/rnae285/61477792/rnae285.pdf. url: https://doi.org/10. 1093/imrn/rnae285

    work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnae285 2025

  2. [1]

    Symplectic singularities

    Arnaud Beauville. “Symplectic singularities”. Inventiones mathematicae 139 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [2]

    Coulomb branches have symplectic singularities

    Gwyn Bellamy. “Coulomb branches have symplectic singularities”. Lett. Math. Phys. 113.5 (2023). doi: 10.1007/s11005-023-01724-5 . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-023-01724-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11005-023-01724-5 2023

  4. [3]

    forthcoming

    David Ben-Zvi, Yiannis Sakellaridis, and Akshay Venkatesh. forthcoming

    work page

  5. [4]

    Relative Langlands Duality

    David Ben-Zvi, Yiannis Sakellaridis, and Akshay Venkatesh. Relative Langlands Duality . 2024. arXiv: 2409.04677 [math.RT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04677

    arXiv 2024

  6. [5]

    Mirrors of 3d Sicilian theories

    Francesco Benini, Yuji Tachikawa, and Dan Xie. “Mirrors of 3d Sicilian theories”. Journal of High Energy Physics 2010.9 (2010). doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2010)063

    doi:10.1007/jhep09(2010)063 2010

  7. [6]

    Equivariant Satake category and Kostant-Whittaker reduction

    Roman Bezrukavnikov and Michael Finkelberg. “Equivariant Satake category and Kostant-Whittaker reduction”. Mosc. Math. J. 8.1 (2008). doi: 10.17323/1609-4514-2008-8-1-39-72

    work page doi:10.17323/1609-4514-2008-8-1-39-72 2008

  8. [7]

    Equivariant homology andK-theory of affine Grassmannians and Toda lattices

    Roman Bezrukavnikov, Michael Finkelberg, and Ivan Mirkovi´ c. “Equivariant homology andK-theory of affine Grassmannians and Toda lattices”.Compos. Math. 141.3 (2005). doi: 10.1112/S0010437X04001228. url: https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X04001228

    doi:10.1112/s0010437x04001228 2005

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    Irregular connections and Kac-Moody root systems

    Philip Boalch. Irregular connections and Kac-Moody root systems. 2008. arXiv: 0806.1050 [math.DG]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1050

    2008 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Simply-laced isomonodromy systems

    Philip Boalch. “Simply-laced isomonodromy systems”. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 116 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s10240-012-0044-8 . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-012-0044-8

    2012 doi

  3. [10]

    Partial implosions and quivers

    Antoine Bourget, Andrew Dancer, Julius F. Grimminger, Amihay Hanany, and Zhenghao Zhong. “Partial implosions and quivers”. J. High Energy Phys. 7 (2022). doi: 10.1007/jhep07(2022)049 . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep07(2022)049. REFERENCES 21

    2022 doi

  4. [11]

    Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional gauge theories and related structures

    Alexander Braverman and Michael Finkelberg. Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional gauge theories and related structures. 2018. arXiv: 1807.09038 [math.AG]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.09038

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Coulomb branches of 3 d N = 4 quiver gauge theories and slices in the affine Grassmannian

    Alexander Braverman, Michael Finkelberg, and Hiraku Nakajima. “Coulomb branches of 3 d N = 4 quiver gauge theories and slices in the affine Grassmannian”. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 23.1 (2019). With two appendices by Braverman, Finkelberg, Joel Kamnitzer, Ryosuke Kodera, Nakajim...

    2019 doi

  6. [13]

    Ring objects in the equivariant derived Satake category arising from Coulomb branches

    Alexander Braverman, Michael Finkelberg, and Hiraku Nakajima. “Ring objects in the equivariant derived Satake category arising from Coulomb branches”. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 23.2 (2019). doi: 10.4310/ATMP.2019.v23.n2.a1

    2019 doi

  7. [14]

    Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories, II

    Alexander Braverman, Michael Finkelberg, and Hiraku Nakajima. “Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories, II”. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22.5 (2018). doi: 10.4310/ATMP.2018.v22.n5.a1. url: https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2018.v22.n5.a1

    2018 doi

  8. [15]

    Corings and Comodules

    Tomasz Brzezinski and Robert Wisbauer. Corings and Comodules . Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  9. [16]

    3d Mirror Symmetry is Mirror Symmetry

    Ki Fung Chan and Naichung Conan Leung. 3d Mirror Symmetry is Mirror Symmetry . 2024. arXiv: 2410.03611 [math-ph]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03611

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Symplectic reduction along a submanifold

    Peter Crooks and Maxence Mayrand. “Symplectic reduction along a submanifold”. Compos. Math. 158.9 (2022). doi: 10.1112/S0010437X22007710. url: https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X22007710

    2022 doi

  11. [18]

    Grimminger, Johan Martens, and Zhenghao Zhong

    Andrew Dancer, Julius F. Grimminger, Johan Martens, and Zhenghao Zhong. Complex Symplectic Contractions and 3d Mirrors . 2024

    2024

  12. [19]

    Symplectic duality and implosions

    Andrew Dancer, Amihay Hanany, and Frances Kirwan. “Symplectic duality and implosions”. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 25.6 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    Implosion for hyperk¨ ahler manifolds

    Andrew S. Dancer, Frances Kirwan, and Andrew Swann. “Implosion for hyperk¨ ahler manifolds”. Com- positio Mathematica 149 (2013)

    2013

  14. [21]

    Devalapurkar

    Sanath K. Devalapurkar. ku-theoretic spectral decompositions for spheres and projective spaces . 2024. arXiv: 2402.03995 [math.AT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03995

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Coulomb branches of star-shaped quivers

    Tudor Dimofte and Niklas Garner. “Coulomb branches of star-shaped quivers”. J. High Energy Phys. 2 (2019). doi: 10.1007/jhep02(2019)004. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2019)004

    2019 doi

  16. [23]

    S-duality of boundary conditions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory

    Davide Gaiotto and Edward Witten. “S-duality of boundary conditions in N = 4 super Yang-Mills theory”. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 13.3 (2009). (Visited on 10/17/2022)

    2009

  17. [24]

    Proof of the Ginzburg-Kazhdan conjecture

    Tom Gannon. “Proof of the Ginzburg-Kazhdan conjecture”. Adv. Math. 448 (2024). doi: 10.1016/j. aim.2024.109701. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2024.109701

    2024

  18. [26]

    Differential operators on the base affine space of SLn and quantized Coulomb branches

    Tom Gannon and Harold Williams. Differential operators on the base affine space of SLn and quantized Coulomb branches. 2023. arXiv: 2312.10278 [math.RT]

    2023

  19. [27]

    Perverse sheaves on a Loop group and Langlands’ duality

    Victor Ginzburg. Perverse sheaves on a Loop group and Langlands’ duality . 2000. arXiv: alg-geom/ 9511007 [alg-geom]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9511007

    2000 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Differential operators on G/U and the Gelfand-Graev action

    Victor Ginzburg and David Kazhdan. “Differential operators on G/U and the Gelfand-Graev action”. Adv. Math. 403 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2022.108368. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim. 2022.108368

    2022

  21. [29]

    Differential operators on G/U and the affine Grassmannian

    Victor Ginzburg and Simon Riche. “Differential operators on G/U and the affine Grassmannian”. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 14.3 (2015). doi: 10.1017/S1474748014000085

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    Tate’s thesis in the de Rham setting

    Justin Hilburn and Sam Raskin. “Tate’s thesis in the de Rham setting”. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 36.3 (2023). doi: 10.1090/jams/1010. url: https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/1010

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Bow varieties as symplectic reductions of T ∗G/P

    Yibo Ji. Bow varieties as symplectic reductions of T ∗G/P . 2023. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2312.04696 . (Visited on 01/29/2025)

    2023 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    Minimal Nilpotent Orbits of type D and E

    Boming Jia. Minimal Nilpotent Orbits of type D and E . 2025. arXiv: 2501.12406 [math.RT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12406

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The Geometry of the affine closure of T ∗(SLn/U )

    Boming Jia. The Geometry of the affine closure of T ∗(SLn/U ). 2021. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2112. 08649. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08649. 22 REFERENCES

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    Symplectic singularities from the Poisson point of view

    D. Kaledin. “Symplectic singularities from the Poisson point of view”. J. Reine Angew. Math. 600 (2006). doi: 10.1515/CRELLE.2006.089. url: https://doi.org/10.1515/CRELLE.2006.089

    2006 doi

  27. [35]

    Levi-Equivariant Restriction of Spherical Perverse Sheaves

    Mark Macerato. Levi-Equivariant Restriction of Spherical Perverse Sheaves . 2023. arXiv: 2309.07279 [math.RT]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Comparison of quiver varieties, loop Grassmannians and nilpo- tent cones in type A

    Ivan Mirkovi´ c and Maxim Vybornov. “Comparison of quiver varieties, loop Grassmannians and nilpo- tent cones in type A”. Advances in Mathematics 407 (2022). doi: 10 . 1016 / j . aim . 2022 . 108397. (Visited on 06/11/2023)

    2022

  29. [37]

    On 2d TQFTs whose values are holomorphic symplectic varieties

    Gregory W. Moore and Yuji Tachikawa. “On 2d TQFTs whose values are holomorphic symplectic varieties”. String-Math 2011 . Vol. 85. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2012. doi: 10.1090/pspum/ 085/1379. url: https://doi.org/10.1090/pspum/085/1379

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    S-dual of Hamiltonian G spaces and relative Langlands duality

    Hiraku Nakajima. S-dual of Hamiltonian G spaces and relative Langlands duality . 2024. arXiv: 2409. 06303 [math.AG]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06303

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cherkis bow varieties and Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories of affine type A

    Hiraku Nakajima and Yuuya Takayama. “Cherkis bow varieties and Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories of affine type A”. Selecta Mathematica. New Series 23.4 (2017). doi: 10.1007/s00029-017- 0341-7. (Visited on 08/15/2022)

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Nahm’s Equations, Quiver Varieties and Parabolic Sheaves

    Yuuya Takayama. “Nahm’s Equations, Quiver Varieties and Parabolic Sheaves”. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 52.1 (2016). doi: 10 . 4171 / prims / 172. (Visited on 01/28/2025)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Coulomb branches for quaternionic representations

    Constantin Teleman. Coulomb branches for quaternionic representations . 2023. arXiv: 2209 . 01088 [math.AT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01088

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    The rˆ ole of Coulomb branches in 2D gauge theory

    Constantin Teleman. “The rˆ ole of Coulomb branches in 2D gauge theory”. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 23.11 (2021). doi: 10.4171/jems/1071. url: https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1071

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    3-Dimensional Mirror Symmetry

    Ben Webster and Philsang Yoo. “3-Dimensional Mirror Symmetry”. Notices of the American Mathe- matical Society 70.09 (2023). doi: 10.1090/noti2778. (Visited on 02/20/2024)

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Generators for Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories

    Alex Weekes. Generators for Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories . arXiv:1903.07734 [math-ph]

    1903 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Quiver gauge theories and symplectic singularities

    Alex Weekes. “Quiver gauge theories and symplectic singularities”. Adv. Math. 396 (2022). doi: 10. 1016/j.aim.2022.108185. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2022.108185

    2022

  38. [46]

    Integral homology of loop groups via Langlands dual groups

    Zhiwei Yun and Xinwen Zhu. “Integral homology of loop groups via Langlands dual groups”. Represent. Theory 15 (2011). doi: 10.1090/S1088- 4165- 2011- 00399- X. url: https://doi.org/10.1090/ S1088-4165-2011-00399-X

    2011 doi

  39. [2019]

    url: http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07734

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1903.07734. url: http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07734

    1903 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.