Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Cataclysmic Variables in Triples: Formation Models and New Discoveries

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a substantial fraction of cataclysmic variables form in triple-star systems via the eccentric Kozai-Lidov mechanism, with many bypassing common-envelope evolution entirely.

desk verdict First real census of CVs in wide triples, with a plausible but not yet load-bearing no-common-envelope fraction; the observations are the strongest part. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14025 v2 pith:J4IYMST7 submitted 2025-01-23 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

Cheyanne Shariat , Kareem El-Badry , Smadar Naoz , Antonio C. Rodriguez , Jan van Roestel This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords cataclysmicvariableshierarchicaltriplestarscommonenvelopeevolutioneccentricKozai-LidovmechanismwhitedwarfspopulationsynthesisGaiaastrometrybinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a meaningful fraction of cataclysmic variables (CVs) — white dwarfs accreting from a companion star — are born in triple-star systems, not isolated binaries. Using Gaia astrometry it builds a sample of about 50 CVs with wide tertiary companions within 1 kpc and infers that at least 10% of CVs host such tertiaries. Three-body simulations then show that a distant third star can drive the inner pair into a tight orbit through the eccentric Kozai-Lidov mechanism, producing CVs that skip the common-envelope phase entirely. If right, the standard picture of CV formation must be extended to include triple dynamics, with consequences for related accreting binaries.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the eccentric Kozai-Lidov (EKL) mechanism: a distant tertiary's secular torque drives the inner binary's eccentricity and inclination through coupled oscillations, and at extreme eccentricities the periastron distance can shrink to a few solar radii, where tides and mass transfer tighten the orbit. The paper couples this to stellar evolution through SSE tracks, to binary mass transfer through COSMIC with a Rappaport-style magnetic braking prescription, and to equilibrium tides that circularize the inner orbit when it shrinks. The central simplification is that once the inner binary crosses its Roche limit it is decoupled from the tertiary and handed to COSMIC, which circularizes the orbit instantly at the onset of mass transfer.

What would settle it

A volume-limited sample of nearby CVs imaged at high angular resolution that finds essentially no tertiary companions at 10–500 au would contradict the prediction that about 30% of CV tertiaries reside there; alternatively, if such a sample shows no excess of CVs with birth periods of 8–20 hours, the dominant eccentric Kozai-Lidov, no-common-envelope channel would be ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that triple-star dynamics are a first-order ingredient in CV formation. The observed sample of 49 CVs with resolved Gaia tertiaries at 150–30,000 au implies a lower-limit tertiary fraction of about 10% for CVs within 150 pc. In a population synthesis of 2,000 hierarchical triples, 47 inner binaries become CVs; seven of these (15% in Section 4.2.1, quoted as 20% in the abstract and conclusions) begin stable mass transfer only after the primary has already become a white dwarf, meaning they never went through a common envelope. Another roughly 60% of the CV-forming triples would not have produced a CV at all if the tertiary were removed, and about half of the common-envelope-forming cases owe their interaction to the tertiary's eccentricity forcing. The simulated and observed populations agree that CV tertiaries are systematically wider than field wide binaries, because stable triples need wide outer orbits to host the initially wide inner binaries that feed the eccentric Kozai-Lidov channel.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations assume that the inner binary instantly circularizes when mass transfer begins, ignoring the eccentric mass transfer that the EKL channel itself produces, and the paper notes that self-consistent eccentric mass transfer could change which systems survive to become CVs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Isolated-binary common-envelope models are incomplete: the triple channel contributes a non-negligible minority of CVs, and about half of the common-envelope systems that form in triples would not have interacted without the tertiary.
  • CVs formed through the triple channel should be born at longer orbital periods (8–20 hr) with more evolved or massive donors, then evolve to shorter periods; observed CVs with tertiaries already show a period excess.
  • CV triples should be wider on average than field wide binaries; the observed 150–30,000 au separations match the simulations, so wide outer orbits are a fingerprint of triple formation.
  • About 30% of CV tertiaries are predicted to lie within 500 au, below Gaia's resolution for most of the sample; high-resolution imaging should uncover them.
  • The same eccentric Kozai-Lidov, no-common-envelope machinery applies to related populations, including ultracompact binaries and low-mass X-ray binaries, making CVs a testbed for triple formation channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I would infer that the 15–20% no-common-envelope fraction is a lower bound if eccentric mass transfer proves more dissipative than instant circularization, since eccentricity would be damped gradually rather than all at once.
  • The predicted roughly 4.7×10^5 Galactic CV triples implies that a few percent of all CVs formed through triples, but this hinges on the assumed binary-to-triple ratio; if triples are rarer or wider, the number drops.
  • A direct test of the EKL channel is to look for faint white-dwarf tertiaries: the models predict many such companions that Gaia misses, and deep ultraviolet or blue imaging of nearby CVs should reveal them.
  • The same eccentricity-forcing channel that makes CVs without a common envelope likely operates for black-hole X-ray binaries, so the CV population is a statistical probe of that rarer channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a sample of 49 CVs with wide Gaia-resolved tertiaries within 1 kpc, derives an observational lower limit for the CV triple fraction, evolves 2000 hierarchical triples with three-body dynamics and stellar evolution, and compares the simulated CV population to the observed one. It concludes that a significant fraction of CVs in triples form without a common envelope via the eccentric Kozai-Lidov mechanism and that observed CV triples are wider than typical wide binaries, as predicted.

Significance. The paper delivers a new, carefully validated sample of ~50 CVs with wide tertiary companions and a detailed population-synthesis study of CV formation in triples. If the conclusions hold, the work demonstrates that isolated-binary common-envelope models are incomplete for a nontrivial fraction of the CV population and connects CV formation to the broader EKL-driven binary-evolution literature. The observational analysis uses explicit chance-alignment probabilities, and the simulations are not fit to the observed sample, making the predicted wider tertiary separations and longer periods falsifiable. The main quantitative claims, however, contain an internal inconsistency and rely on an assumption the authors themselves identify as potentially qualitatively wrong.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4.2.1] The abstract and conclusion state that 20% of CVs in triples form without a common envelope, but Section 4.2.1 explicitly reports 7 out of 47 systems, i.e., 15%, as the fraction that never experience a common envelope. This is a direct numerical inconsistency in a headline result. Please adopt one number throughout and justify the denominator used to compute the percentage, or explain how 20% is derived if 7/47 is not the intended fraction.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Section 4.2.1] The no-CE channel is supported by only four simulated systems that begin WD+MS mass transfer on wide (a1 ~ 10^3 au), extremely eccentric (e1 ~ 0.9999) orbits and are then handed to COSMIC, which instantaneously circularizes the orbit at the onset of mass transfer. Section 5 concedes that this neglect of eccentric mass transfer "can lead to qualitatively different outcomes." For such near-radial encounters, a self-consistent treatment could plausibly produce mergers or failed captures, removing up to four of the seven no-CE systems and lowering the no-CE fraction from 15% to about 6%. Because this fraction is a central claim, please either include an eccentric mass-transfer prescription (e.g., Sepinsky et al. 2009; Hamers & Dosopoulou 2019; Glanz & Perets 2021) in the simulations, or present a dedicated numerical test of the survival and circularization of these four systems, and adjust the claimed fraction accordingly.
  3. [Section 2.6] The paper infers "at least 10% of CVs host wide tertiaries," but the supporting numbers do not establish a strict lower limit. Within 150 pc, the RK catalog yields 2/37 (5.4%) triple systems, or 8% if the borderline system V1108 Her is included, while the 10% figure in the footnote applies to the ZTF catalog. With only two or three systems in the volume-limited sample, the Poisson uncertainty is large and the choice of parent catalog changes the lower limit by a factor of two. Please report the measured fractions with uncertainties for each catalog and either rephrase the claim as an estimate or justify a conservative lower bound that holds across catalogs.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1 and Figure 8] The text states that the final sample contains 49 CVs, while the histogram in Figure 8 labels the observed CV triples as N=53; please reconcile this count or clarify what the additional four objects are.
  2. [Section 3.1] The phrase "and see latter appendix B from the full set of equations" is confusing; please rephrase to point directly to the relevant equations in Naoz (2016).
  3. [Section 4.2.1] The statement that applying Poisson error bars "would likely overestimate the uncertainty" is too strong for a sample of seven systems; please soften this claim or provide a supporting argument.
  4. [Section 5] "suggesting two episode of mass loss" should read "two episodes of mass loss."
  5. [Section 2.6] The sentence "For the 150 pc sample, RK has the smallest triple fraction compared to the other catalogs, though the CVs here are almost all spectroscopically confirmed" uses "though" in a confusing way; consider "and" or "since" instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the simulated no-CE fraction is a model output, not a fitted input, and the observed CV-triple sample is an independent benchmark.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the derivation chain. The observational sample (Sec. 2) is constructed by cross-matching external CV catalogs with the Gaia wide-binary catalog and is used as an independent comparison for the simulations; the inferred >=10% wide-tertiary fraction is a measurement, not a fitted prediction. The population synthesis (Sec. 3) draws initial masses, periods, and mass ratios from literature distributions (Kroupa, Raghavan et al., Moe & Di Stefano) and evolves them with secular three-body equations plus SSE/COSMIC; the headline no-CE fraction is reported as 7/47 simulated CVs in Sec. 4.2.1, a simulation outcome rather than a parameter fitted to the observed CVs. The period and tertiary-separation comparisons (Figs. 7 and 8) are genuine out-of-sample tests. Self-citations to Shariat et al. 2023/2024 are method and initial-condition references, and the robustness claim in Sec. 4.2.1 also cites external work (Toonen et al. 2016; Stephan et al. 2019), so no load-bearing self-citation chain forces the result. The paper's own caveats - Sec. 5's admission that COSMIC's instantaneous circularization neglects eccentric mass transfer and can produce qualitatively different outcomes, and the abstract's 20% vs Sec. 4.2.1's 15% for the no-CE fraction - are real correctness risks and an internal inconsistency, but they are modeling limitations rather than definitional reductions of a prediction to an input. Accordingly, no circular step can be quoted, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on adopted initial condition distributions and on several modeling simplifications that the authors explicitly flag (eccentric mass transfer, CE kicks). No genuinely new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Raghavan et al. (2010) orbital period distribution = log-normal with <log10(P/days)> = 5.03, sigma = 2.28
    Adopted for both inner and outer orbits; the simulated CV fraction and the period distribution of CV triples depend on this input.
  • Kroupa IMF and mass ratio distributions = m1 from Kroupa (1-8 Msun), q1 and q2 uniform in [0.1,1]
    Initial masses and mass ratios set which stars become WDs and donors; changing mass ratios affects merger/CV outcomes.
  • Initial eccentricity and inclination distributions = e1,e2 uniform in [0,1]; mutual inclination isotropic
    EKL excitation strength depends on these; the no-CE channel requires high-eccentricity excursions.
  • Magnetic braking normalization (Rappaport et al. 1983) = torque 6.8e-34 (cgs), gamma_MB=3, off for fully convective donors
    Determines whether post-CE and EKL-shrunk binaries survive to become CVs; the paper validates against MESA but does not fit it to the observed CV triple sample.
  • Galactic CV estimate inputs = tau_CV=1 Gyr, SFR=2/yr, fm1>1=0.1, ftriple=0.1
    Used in Eq. (5) to convert the simulated fCV=47/2000 to a Galactic count of 4.7e5; each is an order-of-magnitude assumption.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The triple dynamics are captured by secular equations to octupole order with 1PN precession and equilibrium tides (Naoz 2016).
    Used throughout Section 3.1; higher-order or quasi-secular effects are neglected, though the paper argues most systems are in the hierarchical regime.
  • domain assumption The inner binary can be handed to COSMIC when it crosses the Roche limit, and COSMIC's instantaneous circularization at mass transfer adequately represents the first mass transfer event.
    Section 3.1 and Section 5 acknowledge this is a simplification that may be qualitative.
  • domain assumption The initial distributions for triple orbital elements (Raghavan period distribution, isotropic inclinations, uniform eccentricities) are representative of CV progenitors.
    Section 3.2; the predicted 20% no-CE fraction and wide tertiary separations depend on these inputs.
  • domain assumption The wide binary catalog of El-Badry et al. (2021a) and the chance-alignment criterion R_chance_align < 0.1 correctly identify bound companions.
    Section 2.1; this underpins the observed CV triple sample.
  • standard math The standard physical background: Newtonian gravity, stellar evolution through SSE, and the Kozai-Lidov mechanism.
    Background accepted; not novel.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cataclysmic Variables in Triples: Formation Models and New Discoveries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J4IYMST7

@misc{pith2026250114025,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cataclysmic Variables in Triples: Formation Models and New Discoveries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J4IYMST7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14025}
}
abstract

The formation of cataclysmic variables (CVs) has long been modeled as a product of common envelope evolution (CEE) in isolated binaries. However, a significant fraction of intermediate-mass stars -- the progenitors of the white dwarfs (WDs) in CVs -- are in triples. We therefore investigate the importance of triple star dynamics in CV formation. Using Gaia astrometry and existing CV catalogs, we construct a sample of $\sim50$ CVs in hierarchical triples within 1 kpc of the Sun, containing main-sequence (MS) and WD tertiaries at separations of 100 - 30,000 au. We infer that at least 10% of CVs host wide tertiaries. To interpret this discovery, we evolve a population of 2000 triples using detailed three-body simulations, 47 of which become CVs. We predict that 20% of CVs in triples form without ever experiencing CEE, where the WD and donor are brought together by the eccentric Kozai-Lidov (EKL) mechanism after the formation of the WD. These systems favor larger donor stars and longer birth orbital periods (8-20 hrs) than typical CVs. Among systems that do undergo CEE, about half would not have interacted without the presence of the tertiary. Triple formation channels both with and without CEE require initially wide inner orbits ($\gtrsim 1$ au), which in turn require larger tertiary separations to be stable. Consistent with this prediction, we find that the observed Gaia CV triples have wider separations on average than normal wide binaries selected in the same way. Our work underscores the importance of triples in shaping interacting binary populations including CVs, ultracompact binaries, and low-mass X-ray binaries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14025 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Pan-STARRS1 images of CV triples with Gaia proper motion arrows indicated for the CV (blue) and the wide companion (red), along with other nearby sources (orange). The arrows are scaled arbitrarily for visual purposes. In this subset of our CV triple sample, we include ASASSN-19wi, DDE 174, YZ Cnc, and Gaia21apv. YZ Cnc (bottom left) has a white dwarf tertiary while the other three have main-sequence companions at a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distance vs separation (left) and angular separation vs. difference in G magnitude (right) for all Gaia CVs. In purple, we plot a randomly selected sample of 105 Gaia wide binaries from El-Badry et al. (2021a), chosen such that the chance alignment probability is less than 10%, as is the case with our CVs. In orange, we show the CV triples. In the left panel, the black (green) lines denote the 1” and 4” angular reso… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Extinction-corrected color-magnitude diagram of CVs (orange) and their wide tertiary companions (black). These CVs are identified from the VSX, ZTF, and RK catalogs and have resolved Gaia proper motion companions. The purple background points are Gaia sources within 100 pc. On the top x-axis, we display the stellar types that correspond to different GBP − GRP colors. The y-axis shows the absolute magnitude for the s… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fraction of CVs that reside in triples in vari￾ous volume-limited sub-samples. For each bin, we plot the fraction of CVs within the given distance bin that host wide tertiary companions for classified CVs in the RK, VSX, and ZTF catalogs. Poisson errors are plotted for…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Our numerical simulations solve the three-body equa￾tions of motion up to the octupole level of approximation (full set of equations in Naoz 2016). We also include stellar evolution for all three stars using the Single Stellar Evolution (SSE) code (Hurley et al. 2000).…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Orbital parameters of CV triples at different stages of evolution. Only triples that eventually become CVs are marked with larger points circular points. In the first column, we show the initial conditions of triples in our population. The blue outlined points eventual…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Separations distribution of observed CV triples (orange), simulated CV triples (black) compared to wide binaries (purple, top) and wide triples (purple, bottom) in the field. Top: The orange distribution shows the separations of Gaia CV triples (between the CV and the …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Radial velocity curve for IGR J19308+0530. In orange, we show the measured RVs and their uncertainties. In black we show our best-fit circular orbit folded on a period of 14.6 hours. The purple lines show predictions for random samples from the posterior of our RV fit…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between MESA and COSMIC binary evolution using different magnetic braking prescriptions. All tracks show the evolution of a WD+MS binary with MWD = 0.9 M⊙, Mdonor = 1 M⊙, and Porb = 1 day initially. The black curve shows the evolution in MESA, and the orang…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Orbital parameters of WD accreting systems in triples at different stages of evolution. All of the large circular points evolved to host inner binaries that contain a WD accreting from a MS or evolved companion. The first panel shows the orbital parameters at the firs…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Optical light curves for all CV triples with ZTF data. We show available photometry from the ZTF g, r, and i band and label each plot by the Gaia DR3 source id [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Continuation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. V407 Vul: a triple star system with an AM CVn detectable by gravitational wave observatories

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    V407 Vul is a hierarchical triple: a 569-s AM CVn white-dwarf binary bound to a G-type tertiary at ~120 AU, the first 'verification triple' for LISA.

  2. Unveiling the nature of G6096: a likely hierarchical triple system

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    G6096 is likely a hierarchical triple of main-sequence stars rather than a binary hosting a white dwarf or neutron star.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, L40, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz181

    Abril, J., Schmidtobreick, L., Ederoclite, A., & L´ opez-Sanjuan, C. 2020, MNRAS, 492, L40, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz181

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz181 2020

  2. [2]

    Mass Transfer in Eccentric Orbits with Self-consistent Stellar Evolution

    Ak, T., Bilir, S., Ak, S., Co¸ skuno˘ glu, K. B., & Eker, Z. 2010, NewA, 15, 491, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.11.007 Akira Rocha, K., Hur, R., Kalogera, V., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.11840, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.11840

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.11840 2010

  3. [3]

    C., & Siegelman, R

    Alcock, C., Fristrom, C. C., & Siegelman, R. 1986, ApJ, 302, 462, doi: 10.1086/164005

    doi:10.1086/164005 1986

  4. [4]

    2003, ApJ, 582, 358, doi: 10.1086/343030

    Andronov, N., Pinsonneault, M., & Sills, A. 2003, ApJ, 582, 358, doi: 10.1086/343030

    doi:10.1086/343030 2003

  5. [5]

    Antognini, J. M. O. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3610, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1552

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1552 2015

  6. [6]

    2014, ApJ, 781, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/45

    Antonini, F., Murray, N., & Mikkola, S. 2014, ApJ, 781, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/45

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/45 2014

  7. [7]

    Antonini, F., & Perets, H. B. 2012, ApJ, 757, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/27

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/27 2012

  8. [8]

    2023, A&A, 675, A199, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346522

    Avakyan, A., Neumann, M., Zainab, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A199, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346522

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346522 2023

Show all 150 references
  1. [9]

    2024, A&A, 692, A247, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452637 Belczy´ nski, K., Miko lajewska, J., Munari, U., Ivison, R

    Bashi, D., & Tokovinin, A. 2024, A&A, 692, A247, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452637 Belczy´ nski, K., Miko lajewska, J., Munari, U., Ivison, R. J., & Friedjung, M. 2000, A&AS, 146, 407, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000280

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 2950, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1841

    Belloni, D., Giersz, M., Askar, A., Leigh, N., & Hypki, A. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 2950, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1841

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    J., Leigh, N

    Belloni, D., Giersz, M., Rocha-Pinto, H. J., Leigh, N. W. C., & Askar, A. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2516

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    2021, in The Golden Age of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects V, Vol

    Belloni, D., & Rivera Sandoval, L. 2021, in The Golden Age of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects V, Vol. 2-7, 13, doi: 10.22323/1.368.0013

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Shen, K. J. 2024, A&A, 682, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347931

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    R., Zorotovic, M., et al

    Belloni, D., Schreiber, M. R., Zorotovic, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5626, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1421

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Thomas, H. C. 2021, A&A, 645, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038598

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    J., & Holman, M

    Bhaskar, H., Li, G., Hadden, S., Payne, M. J., & Holman, M. J. 2021, AJ, 161, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abcbfc

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Bodaghee, A., Courvoisier, T. J. L., Rodriguez, J., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 585, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077091

    2007 doi

  11. [19]

    2017, PASP, 129, 034002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa5455

    Brahm, R., Jord´ an, A., & Espinoza, N. 2017, PASP, 129, 034002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa5455

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    Breivik, K., Mingarelli, C. M. F., & Larson, S. L. 2020, ApJ, 901, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abab99

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    2024, AJ, 168, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad6260

    Bruch, A. 2024, AJ, 168, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad6260

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Bruch, A., & Diaz, M. P. 2017, NewA, 50, 109, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2016.07.011

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Buckley, D. A. H., & Tuohy, I. R. 1987, PASA, 7, 151, doi: 10.1017/S1323358000022128

    1987 doi

  16. [24]

    B., El-Badry, K., Kara, E., et al

    Burdge, K. B., El-Badry, K., Kara, E., et al. 2024, Nature, 635, 316, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08120-6

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06882, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06882

    Canbay, R., Ak, T., Bilir, S., Soydugan, F., & Eker, Z. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06882, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06882

    2024 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    G., et al

    Chamandy, L., Tu, Y., Blackman, E. G., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 1070, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz887

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    E., Georgakarakos, N., Aviles, A., et al

    Chavez, C. E., Georgakarakos, N., Aviles, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 4629, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1112

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    E., Tovmassian, G., Aguilar, L

    Chavez, C. E., Tovmassian, G., Aguilar, L. A., Zharikov, S., & Henden, A. A. 2012, A&A, 538, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117209

    2012 doi

  21. [29]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae

    Chen, X., Wang, S., Deng, L., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    D., & M´ enard, B

    Cheng, S., Cummings, J. D., & M´ enard, B. 2019, ApJ, 886, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4989

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    T., & Bowyer, S

    Clarke, J. T., & Bowyer, S. 1984, A&A, 140, 345

    1984

  24. [32]

    S., Littlefair, S

    Dhillon, V. S., Littlefair, S. P., Marsh, T. R., Sarna, M. J., & Boakes, E. H. 2002, A&A, 393, 611, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021045

    2002 doi

  25. [33]

    J., & Liu, M

    Dupuy, T. J., & Liu, M. C. 2011, ApJ, 733, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/122

    2011 doi

  26. [34]

    2024, A&A, 685, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    P., Kiseleva, L

    Eggleton, P. P., Kiseleva, L. G., & Hut, P. 1998, ApJ, 499, 853, doi: 10.1086/305670

    1998 doi

  28. [36]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 4916, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2945

    El-Badry, K., Conroy, C., Fuller, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 4916, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2945

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 4884, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2186

    El-Badry, K., & Rix, H.-W. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 4884, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2186

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., & Heintz, T. M. 2021a, MNRAS, 506, 2269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab323

    doi

  31. [39]

    2021b, MNRAS, 505, 2051, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1318

    El-Badry, K., Quataert, E., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2021b, MNRAS, 505, 2051, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1318

    doi

  32. [40]

    R., Carpenter, K

    Evans, N. R., Carpenter, K. G., Robinson, R., Kienzle, F., & Dekas, A. E. 2005, AJ, 130, 789, doi: 10.1086/430458

    2005 doi

  33. [41]

    2007, ApJ, 669, 1298, doi: 10.1086/521702 33

    Fabrycky, D., & Tremaine, S. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1298, doi: 10.1086/521702 33

    2007 doi

  34. [42]

    Nitschelm, C. H. R. 2018, A&A, 618, A150, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731265

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    M., Richer, H

    Fregeau, J. M., Richer, H. B., Rasio, F. A., & Hurley, J. R. 2009, ApJL, 695, L20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/L20

    2009 doi

  36. [44]

    S., Long, K

    Froning, C. S., Long, K. S., G¨ ansicke, B., & Szkody, P. 2012, ApJS, 199, 7, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/7 Gentile Fusillo, N. P., Tremblay, P. E., Cukanovaite, E., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 3877, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2672

    2012 doi

  37. [45]

    Glanz, H., & Perets, H. B. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 2659, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2291

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    B., & Fragione, G

    Grishin, E., Perets, H. B., & Fragione, G. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 4907, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2477

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    B., Zenati, Y., & Michaely, E

    Grishin, E., Perets, H. B., Zenati, Y., & Michaely, E. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 276, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3096

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    Halpern, J. P. 2013, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 5208, 1

    2013

  41. [49]

    P., & Thorstensen, J

    Halpern, J. P., & Thorstensen, J. R. 2015, AJ, 150, 170, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/170

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    S., & Dosopoulou, F

    Hamers, A. S., & Dosopoulou, F. 2019, ApJ, 872, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab001d

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    2020, PASJ, 72, 76, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaa065

    Han, Z., Boonrucksar, S., Qian, S., et al. 2020, PASJ, 72, 76, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaa065

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    M., Hermes, J

    Heintz, T. M., Hermes, J. J., El-Badry, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac78d9

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    N., Tonry, J

    Heinze, A. N., Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 241, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aae47f

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    A., & Szkody, P

    Horne, K., Wade, R. A., & Szkody, P. 1986, MNRAS, 219, 791, doi: 10.1093/mnras/219.4.791

    1986 doi

  47. [55]

    B., & Liebert, J

    Howell, S. B., & Liebert, J. 1994, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4073, 1

    1994

  48. [56]

    R., Pols, O

    Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x

    2000

  49. [57]

    R., Tout, C

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    2002

  50. [58]

    P., Perets, H

    Igoshev, A. P., Perets, H. B., & Michaely, E. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 1448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa833

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    T., Breedt, E., et al

    Inight, K., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Breedt, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 4867, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2018

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    Ivanova, N., & Taam, R. E. 2003, ApJ, 599, 516, doi: 10.1086/379192

    2003 doi

  53. [61]

    2013, A&A Rv, 21, 59, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2

    Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Chen, X., et al. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 59, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2

    2013 doi

  54. [62]

    J., Engels, D., Wei, J

    Jiang, X. J., Engels, D., Wei, J. Y., Tesch, F., & Hu, J. Y. 2000, A&A, 362, 263

    2000

  55. [63]

    2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1211.4584, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1211.4584

    Katz, B., & Dong, S. 2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1211.4584, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1211.4584

    2012 doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    1999, The Messenger, 95, 8

    Kaufer, A., Stahl, O., Tubbesing, S., et al. 1999, The Messenger, 95, 8

    1999

  57. [65]

    R., & Kolb, U

    King, A. R., & Kolb, U. 1995, ApJ, 439, 330, doi: 10.1086/175176

    1995 doi

  58. [66]

    G., Eggleton, P

    Kiseleva, L. G., Eggleton, P. P., & Mikkola, S. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 292, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01903.x

    1998

  59. [67]

    2015, A&A, 584, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526102

    Kjurkchieva, D., Khruzina, T., Dimitrov, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526102

    2015 doi

  60. [68]

    Y., & Katz, B

    Klein, Y. Y., & Katz, B. 2024, MNRAS, 535, L31, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slae089

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    2012, Mem

    Knigge, C. 2012, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 83, 549, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1112.1074

    2012 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    Knigge, C., Toonen, S., & Boekholt, T. C. N. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 1895, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1336

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    1996, MNRAS, 282, 1454, doi: 10.1093/mnras/282.4.1454

    Kolb, U., & Stehle, R. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1454, doi: 10.1093/mnras/282.4.1454

    1996 doi

  64. [72]

    1962, AJ, 67, 591, doi: 10.1086/108790

    Kozai, Y. 1962, AJ, 67, 591, doi: 10.1086/108790

    1962 doi

  65. [73]

    M., & Perets, H

    Kratter, K. M., & Perets, H. B. 2012, ApJ, 753, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/91

    2012 doi

  66. [74]

    S., Rui, N

    Kremer, K., Ye, C. S., Rui, N. Z., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7919

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    A., & Gilmore, G

    Kroupa, P., Tout, C. A., & Gilmore, G. 1993, MNRAS, 262, 545, doi: 10.1093/mnras/262.3.545

    1993 doi

  68. [76]

    2022, PhRvD, 105, 024017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024017 La Dous, C

    Kuntz, A. 2022, PhRvD, 105, 024017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024017 La Dous, C. 1990, SSRv, 52, 203, doi: 10.1007/BF00167124

    2022 doi

  69. [77]

    Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planet. Space Sci., 9, 719, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0

    1962 doi

  70. [78]

    Lim, H., & Rodriguez, C. L. 2020, PhRvD, 102, 064033, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064033

    2020 doi

  71. [79]

    P., Godon, P., Hubeny, I., et al

    Linnell, A. P., Godon, P., Hubeny, I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1839, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1839

    2009 doi

  72. [80]

    P., Dhillon, V

    Littlefair, S. P., Dhillon, V. S., Marsh, T. R., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1582, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13539.x

    2008

  73. [81]

    S., Rasio, F

    Lombardi, James C., J., Warren, J. S., Rasio, F. A., Sills, A., & Warren, A. R. 2002, ApJ, 568, 939, doi: 10.1086/339060

    2002 doi

  74. [82]

    X., & Naoz, S

    Lu, C. X., & Naoz, S. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1506, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz036

    2019 doi

  75. [83]

    2016, MNRAS, 458, 3060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw475

    Luo, L., Katz, B., & Dong, S. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw475

    2016 doi

  76. [84]

    A., & Aarseth, S

    Mardling, R. A., & Aarseth, S. J. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 398, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03974.x Mart ´ ınez-Pais, I. G., Mart ´ ın-Hern´ andez, N. L., Casares, J., & Rodr ´ ıguez-Gil, P. 2000, ApJ, 538, 315, doi: 10.1086/309092

    2001

  77. [85]

    2015, ApJL, 799, L23, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/799/2/L23 34

    Chabrier, G. 2015, ApJL, 799, L23, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/799/2/L23 34

    2015 doi

  78. [86]

    Michaely, E., & Perets, H. B. 2014, ApJ, 794, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/122 —. 2019a, MNRAS, 484, 4711, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz352 —. 2019b, ApJL, 887, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5b9b

    2014 doi

  79. [87]

    2017, ApJS, 230, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    Moe, M., & Di Stefano, R. 2017, ApJS, 230, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    2017 doi

  80. [88]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 665, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2492

    Mushkin, J., & Katz, B. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 665, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2492

    2020 doi

  81. [89]

    2024, PASP, 136, 094203, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad7981

    Nagarajan, P., & El-Badry, K. 2024, PASP, 136, 094203, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad7981

    2024 doi

  82. [90]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.17560

    Nagarajan, P., El-Badry, K., Lam, C., & Reggiani, H. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.17560. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17560

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    Naoz, S. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    2016 doi

  84. [92]

    Naoz, S., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2014, ApJ, 793, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/137

    2014 doi

  85. [93]

    2013a, MNRAS, 431, 2155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt302

    Teyssandier, J. 2013a, MNRAS, 431, 2155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt302

    doi

  86. [94]

    P., & Rasio, F

    Naoz, S., Fragos, T., Geller, A., Stephan, A. P., & Rasio, F. A. 2016, ApJL, 822, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L24

    2016 doi

  87. [95]

    2013b, ApJ, 773, 187, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/187

    Naoz, S., Kocsis, B., Loeb, A., & Yunes, N. 2013b, ApJ, 773, 187, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/187

    doi

  88. [96]

    2021, ApJ, 921, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac14be

    Nelson, T., Ting, Y.-S., Hawkins, K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac14be

    2021 doi

  89. [97]

    P., & Warner, B

    Odonoghue, D., Fairall, A. P., & Warner, B. 1987, MNRAS, 225, 43, doi: 10.1093/mnras/225.1.43

    1987 doi

  90. [98]

    Offner, S. S. R., Moe, M., Kratter, K. M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066

    2023 doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    B., & Wade, R

    Oke, J. B., & Wade, R. A. 1982, AJ, 87, 670, doi: 10.1086/113143

    1982 doi

  92. [100]

    1976, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Paczynski, B. 1976, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 73, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems, ed. P. Eggleton, S. Mitton, & J. Whelan, 75

    1976

  93. [101]

    F., G¨ ansicke, B

    Pala, A. F., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Breedt, E., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3799, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa764

    2020 doi

  94. [102]

    F., et al

    Parisi, P., Masetti, N., Rojas, A. F., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322409

    2014 doi

  95. [103]

    A., Warner, B., et al

    Paterson, K., Woudt, P. A., Warner, B., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2422, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1018

    2019 doi

  96. [104]

    1984, ApJS, 54, 443, doi: 10.1086/190940

    Patterson, J. 1984, ApJS, 54, 443, doi: 10.1086/190940

    1984 doi

  97. [106]

    B., Augusteijn, T., & Tappert, C

    Potter, S. B., Augusteijn, T., & Tappert, C. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 565, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09569.x

    2005

  98. [107]

    2004, PASP, 116, 1117, doi: 10.1086/427272

    Price, A., Gary, B., Bedient, J., et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 1117, doi: 10.1086/427272

    2004 doi

  99. [108]

    D., Mallett, J., & von Harrach, S

    Pulley, D., Sharp, I. D., Mallett, J., & von Harrach, S. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5725, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1676

    2022 doi

  100. [109]

    A., Henry, T

    Raghavan, D., McAlister, H. A., Henry, T. J., et al. 2010, ApJS, 190, 1, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1

    2010 doi

  101. [110]

    Rappaport, S., Verbunt, F., & Joss, P. C. 1983, ApJ, 275, 713, doi: 10.1086/161569

    1983 doi

  102. [111]

    M., van Grunsven, T

    Ratti, E. M., van Grunsven, T. F. J., Torres, M. A. P., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, L10, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sls052

    2013 doi

  103. [112]

    2003, A&A, 404, 301, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030330 Rivera Sandoval, L., Belloni, D., & Ramos Arevalo, M

    Ritter, H., & Kolb, U. 2003, A&A, 404, 301, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030330 Rivera Sandoval, L., Belloni, D., & Ramos Arevalo, M. 2024, ApJL, 964, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2c8f

    2003 doi

  104. [113]

    C., El-Badry, K., Suleimanov, V., et al

    Rodriguez, A. C., El-Badry, K., Suleimanov, V., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.16053, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.16053

    2024 doi arXiv

  105. [114]

    A., & Chaty, S

    Rodriguez, J., Tomsick, J. A., & Chaty, S. 2008, A&A, 482, 731, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20079208 Rodr ´ ıguez-Gil, P., Torres, M. A. P., G¨ ansicke, B. T., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 805, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811312

    2008 doi

  106. [115]

    E., & Vrielmann, S

    Barrett, P. E., & Vrielmann, S. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 685, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06209.x

    2003

  107. [116]

    C., Naoz, S., & Geller, A

    Rose, S. C., Naoz, S., & Geller, A. M. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 2480, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1846

    2019 doi

  108. [117]

    L., Taam, R

    Sandquist, E. L., Taam, R. E., Chen, X., Bodenheimer, P., & Burkert, A. 1998, ApJ, 500, 909, doi: 10.1086/305778

    1998 doi

  109. [118]

    J., Dhillon, V

    Sarna, M. J., Dhillon, V. S., Marsh, T. R., & Marks, P. B. 1995, MNRAS, 272, L41, doi: 10.1093/mnras/272.1.L41

    1995 doi

  110. [119]

    R., Zorotovic, M., & Wijnen, T

    Schreiber, M. R., Zorotovic, M., & Wijnen, T. P. G. 2016, MNRAS, 455, L16, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv144

    2016 doi

  111. [120]

    D., Nebot Gomez-Moran, A., Schreiber, M

    Schwope, A. D., Nebot Gomez-Moran, A., Schreiber, M. R., & G¨ ansicke, B. T. 2009, A&A, 500, 867, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911699

    2009 doi

  112. [121]

    F., Willems, B., Kalogera, V., & Rasio, F

    Sepinsky, J. F., Willems, B., Kalogera, V., & Rasio, F. A. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1387, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1387

    2009 doi

  113. [122]

    J., & Thompson, T

    Shappee, B. J., & Thompson, T. A. 2013, ApJ, 766, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/64

    2013 doi

  114. [123]

    M., Howell, S

    Shara, M. M., Howell, S. B., Furlan, E., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 560, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2212

    2021 doi

  115. [124]

    2025, ApJ, 983, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbf01 —

    Shariat, C., Naoz, S., El-Badry, K., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbf01 —. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.06257, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.06257

    2025 doi arXiv

  116. [125]

    Shariat, C., Naoz, S., Hansen, B. M. S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf76b

    2023 doi

  117. [126]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 5615, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2013 35

    Shiber, S., Iaconi, R., De Marco, O., & Soker, N. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5615, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2013 35

    2019 doi

  118. [127]

    1972, ApJ, 171, 565, doi: 10.1086/151310

    Skumanich, A. 1972, ApJ, 171, 565, doi: 10.1086/151310

    1972 doi

  119. [128]

    Solheim, J. E. 2010, PASP, 122, 1133, doi: 10.1086/656680

    2010 doi

  120. [129]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b0e

    Souza, L., & Baptista, R. 2024, ApJ, 972, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b0e

    2024 doi

  121. [130]

    P., Naoz, S., & Gaudi, B

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., & Gaudi, B. S. 2018, AJ, 156, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad6e5 —. 2021, ApJ, 922, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac22a9

    2018 doi

  122. [131]

    P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2019, in AAS/Division of Dynamical Astronomy Meeting, Vol. 51, AAS/Division of Dynamical Astronomy Meeting, 202.02

    2019

  123. [132]

    Szkody, P., & Howell, S. B. 1993, ApJ, 403, 743, doi: 10.1086/172245

    1993 doi

  124. [133]

    Szkody, P., Dicenzo, B., Ho, A. Y. Q., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7cce

    2020 doi

  125. [134]

    Thompson, T. A. 2011, ApJ, 741, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/82

    2011 doi

  126. [135]

    R., & Skinner, J

    Thorstensen, J. R., & Skinner, J. N. 2012, AJ, 144, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/3/81

    2012 doi

  127. [136]

    2014, AJ, 147, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/87 —

    Tokovinin, A. 2014, AJ, 147, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/87 —. 2022, ApJ, 926, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4584

    2014 doi

  128. [137]

    2006, A&A, 450, 681, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054427

    Tokovinin, A., Thomas, S., Sterzik, M., & Udry, S. 2006, A&A, 450, 681, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054427

    2006 doi

  129. [138]

    Toonen, S., Boekholt, T. C. N., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2022, A&A, 661, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141991

    2022 doi

  130. [139]

    2016, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 3, 6, doi: 10.1186/s40668-016-0019-0

    Toonen, S., Hamers, A., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2016, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 3, 6, doi: 10.1186/s40668-016-0019-0

    2016 doi

  131. [140]

    T., & Boekholt, T

    Toonen, S., Hollands, M., G¨ ansicke, B. T., & Boekholt, T. 2017, A&A, 602, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629978

    2017 doi

  132. [141]

    2020, A&A, 640, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936835

    Bandopadhyay, D. 2020, A&A, 640, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936835

    2020 doi

  133. [142]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1029

    Tremaine, S. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1029

    2023 doi

  134. [143]

    1981, A&A, 100, L7

    Verbunt, F., & Zwaan, C. 1981, A&A, 100, L7

    1981

  135. [144]

    Bellinger, E. P. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2540

    2022 doi

  136. [145]

    1995, Cataclysmic variable stars, Vol

    Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic variable stars, Vol. 28

    1995

  137. [146]

    C., Naoz, S., & Hansen, B

    Weldon, G. C., Naoz, S., & Hansen, B. M. S. 2024, ApJ, 974, 302, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad77a9

    2024 doi

  138. [147]

    T.-C., Chou, Y., Ngeow, C.-C., et al

    Yang, M. T.-C., Chou, Y., Ngeow, C.-C., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 094202, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa7a99

    2017 doi

  139. [148]

    G., Li, H

    Yang, Y. G., Li, H. L., Dai, H. F., & Zhang, L. Y. 2010, AJ, 140, 1687, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1687

    2010 doi

  140. [149]

    Zahn, J. P. 1977, A&A, 57, 383

    1977

  141. [150]

    Zhang, E., Naoz, S., & Will, C. M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.08271, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.08271

    2023 doi arXiv

  142. [151]

    Zorotovic, M., & Schreiber, M. R. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1080, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.08.044

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.