Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Foundation Neural-Networks Quantum States as a Unified Ansatz for Multiple Hamiltonians

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that one fixed Transformer wave function, trained simultaneously across many Hamiltonians with ensemble Stochastic Reconfiguration, can reproduce per-system ground states and generalize to unseen couplings, with the…

desk verdict One Transformer-based variational state conditioned on Hamiltonian couplings is a real step forward in multi-system NQS, and the disorder results are excellent; the J1-J2-J3 phase-diagram claim relies on self-referential validation and should be read as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09488 v3 pith:P7GQDDWT submitted 2025-02-13 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el

Riccardo Rende , Luciano Loris Viteritti , Federico Becca , Antonello Scardicchio , Alessandro Laio , Giuseppe Carleo This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el
keywords foundationmodelneural-networkquantumstatesTransformerwavefunctionfidelitysusceptibilityphasetransitionsdisorderedsystemsstochasticreconfigurationvariationalMonteCarlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a single neural-network wave function that takes both the spin configuration and the Hamiltonian couplings as input, so that one variational state approximates the ground states of an entire family of Hamiltonians. The authors claim that ensemble Stochastic Reconfiguration optimizes this state across many systems with the same computational cost as optimizing one system and with no accuracy loss as the number of systems grows. If correct, this replaces many system-specific simulations with one pretrained model, making disorder-averaged observables and coupling-space fidelity susceptibility cheap to compute. The paper's own tests show that generalization works inside a phase but not across phase boundaries.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a multimodal Vision Transformer: spin configurations are patched and embedded, and the couplings are either concatenated to every patch when there are $O(1)$ couplings, or patched and embedded with a separate matrix and then concatenated token-by-token when there are $O(N)$ couplings as in disorder, so attention mixes configuration and coupling information. Optimization uses ensemble Stochastic Reconfiguration, which solves $\mathbf{S}\dot{\theta}=-\tfrac{1}{2}\mathbf{G}$ where both the geometric matrix $\mathbf{S}$ and the gradient $\mathbf{G}$ are averages over the coupling distribution $P(\gamma)$, regularized by a diagonal shift $\lambda$. The fidelity susceptibility $\chi_{ij}(\gamma)=\Re\{\langle \hat{O}_{\gamma,i}^\dagger \hat{O}_{\gamma,j}\rangle_\gamma-\langle \hat{O}_{\gamma,i}^\dagger\rangle_\gamma\langle \hat{O}_{\gamma,j}\rangle_\gamma\}$, with $\hat{O}_{\gamma,i}$ the diagonal operator of log-amplitude derivatives with respect to coupling $\gamma^{(i)}$, is then available in closed form through automatic differentiation.

What would settle it

Compute the FNQS fidelity-susceptibility matrix for the $J_1$-$J_2$-$J_3$ model on a small cluster where exact diagonalization gives the phase boundaries: if the peak locations and eigenvector directions do not match the exact order-parameter transitions, the claim that Eq. (22) detects transitions without order parameters is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the ground-state manifold $\gamma \mapsto |\psi_0(\gamma)\rangle$ of a Hamiltonian family can be approximated by one fixed-capacity Transformer state $\psi_\theta(\sigma|\gamma)$ trained on the ensemble loss $\mathcal{L}(\theta)=\int d\gamma\,P(\gamma)\,\langle \hat{H}_\gamma\rangle_\gamma$. The authors demonstrate this on the transverse-field Ising chain, where a single network trained on five field values reproduces all five ground states and interpolates to unseen fields; on the $J_1$-$J_2$-$J_3$ Heisenberg model, where one network trained on 4000 coupling points maps the phase diagram; and on the random transverse-field Ising chain, where one network trained on 1000 disorder realizations matches exact results for disorder-averaged correlations and magnetization distributions. They further claim that the coupling-space geometric tensor, computed by automatic differentiation of the log-amplitude with respect to the couplings, gives a generalized fidelity susceptibility that detects phase transitions without order parameters, and that this is the first such calculation for a system with more than one coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme rests on assuming one fixed-capacity neural network can represent the coupling-to-ground-state map smoothly enough that amplitudes and coupling derivatives track the exact states, a property the paper verifies numerically but does not prove and that fails across phase boundaries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One trained FNQS yields ground-state energies and correlation functions for many disorder realizations; the paper reports training on $R=1000$ realizations with only 10 Monte Carlo samples per realization and test error matching training error.
  • The coupling-space quantum geometric tensor, computable by automatic differentiation, gives a generalized fidelity susceptibility for Hamiltonians with several couplings, which the paper states is the first such calculation for more than one coupling.
  • Pretrained FNQS can be fine-tuned for specific systems, and the released checkpoints let other users start from a common model rather than training from scratch.
  • Training data must cover every phase of interest: the supplementary information shows that a model trained only in the paramagnetic phase of the transverse-field Ising chain cannot generalize into the ordered phase.
  • Increasing the number of Transformer layers systematically lowers the variational V-score on the $J_1$-$J_2$ Heisenberg model, so accuracy scales with network capacity even when one network is optimized across 1000 coupling values.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the coupling-to-ground-state map is smooth enough, the same ensemble-trained state could be differentiated repeatedly in coupling space to produce higher-order thermodynamic derivatives, such as specific heat or susceptibility surfaces, extending the paper's first-derivative demonstration into a surrogate equation of state.
  • Editorial inference: a natural stress test the paper does not run is to train only on one side of a first-order transition and then measure how the fidelity-susceptibility eigenvector directions degrade, which would quantify how much transition structure is genuinely learned rather than interpolated.
  • Editorial inference: because attention mixes coupling tokens with configuration tokens, the architecture should transfer to other parameterized Hamiltonian families, such as pressure-driven or electric-field-driven transitions, with no change to the ensemble loss.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States (FNQS), a Transformer-based variational ansatz that takes both spin configurations and Hamiltonian couplings as input, together with an ensemble formulation of Stochastic Reconfiguration that minimizes the averaged energy L(θ)=∫dγ P(γ)⟨H_γ⟩_γ over a distribution of couplings. The authors demonstrate that a single FNQS can be trained simultaneously on many systems with a fixed total batch size, can be evaluated on couplings not present in the training set, and can be used to compute disorder-averaged observables and a coupling-space fidelity susceptibility. Validation is provided on the one-dimensional transverse-field Ising chain (exact ground-state energies, square magnetization, fidelity susceptibility with finite-size scaling), on the J1-J2-J3 Heisenberg square lattice (order parameters and claimed unsupervised phase boundaries from the fidelity-susceptibility tensor), on the random transverse-field Ising chain (energies, critical correlation functions, and distributions of squared magnetization against numerically exact results), and on an out-of-distribution generalization example for a J2L/J2R diagonal-frustration model. The trained models are publicly released on the Hugging Face Hub with NetKet examples.

Significance. If the results hold, FNQS provide a practical route to amortized quantum many-body ground-state simulation: a single pretrained network could replace many system-specific NQS optimizations, substantially reduce the cost of disorder averaging, and give access to coupling derivatives and hence fidelity susceptibilities. The ensemble-SR construction is a clean and useful contribution with a clear computational scaling (constant cost in the number of systems at fixed total batch), and the exact benchmarks on the Ising and random-Ising chains are convincing. The public release of the trained architectures and NetKet interfaces strengthens reproducibility. The main reservation is that the multi-coupling phase-transition detection on the J1-J2-J3 model is validated only internally against order parameters obtained from the same ansatz, so the paper's most novel application—unsupervised detection of quantum phase transitions—requires an independent check before the claims are fully established. With such a check, the paper would represent a significant step for neural-network quantum states.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (22); Results, J1-J2-J3 Heisenberg model] The generalized fidelity susceptibility χ_ij(γ) in Eq. (22) is the quantum geometric tensor of the variational state |ψ_θ(γ)⟩, not automatically the exact ground-state fidelity susceptibility. The equality holds only if ψ_θ(σ|γ) reproduces the exact ground state and its first derivatives with respect to the couplings in a neighborhood of γ. For the transverse-field Ising chain this is checked against the exact solution (Fig. 2c), but for the J1-J2-J3 model the boundaries inferred from χ(γ) in Fig. 3a are compared only with order parameters (m_Néel, m_stripe, d^2) computed from the same FNQS wave function (Fig. 3b-d). The observed correspondence is therefore an internal-consistency check, not an independent validation. The Introduction's claim of 'rigorous, unsupervised detection of quantum phase transitions' is not yet established. Please validate at least one cut of the J1-J2-J3 phase diagram against an independent method—for example, exact diagonalization on small clusters as already done at J3=0 in Fig. 4a, quantum Monte Carlo on sign-positive lines, or published tensor-network results (Refs. 47-48)—and explicitly discuss the SI result (Supplementary Fig. 2) that FNQS do not extrapolate across phase boundaries as a limitation of the unsupervised approach.
  2. [Results, Out-of-distribution generalization; Supplementary Information] The abstract and introduction state that FNQS 'can generalize to physical Hamiltonians beyond those encountered during training', with the abstract presenting this without qualification. The evidence in the paper is limited to (i) interpolation between training couplings within the same phase (Fig. 2b), (ii) i.i.d. disorder realizations with the same coupling distribution (Fig. 5), and (iii) extrapolation from the axes J2L=0 or J2R=0 to the symmetric point J2L=J2R, where the relative energy error degrades from about 10^-5 at J2/J1=0.1 to 10^-1 at J2/J1=0.6 (Fig. 7c). Supplementary Fig. 2 explicitly shows that a model trained on one side of a quantum phase transition fails on the other side. The generalization claims in the abstract, the Introduction, and the caption of Fig. 1 should be qualified to state that generalization is demonstrated within the training distribution and for limited extrapolation near the training support, and the phase-boundary limitation should appear in the main text where generalization is advertised.
  3. [Results, Transverse-field Ising chain, Fig. 2a inset; Fig. 5a] The claim that accuracy 'remains constant with no observable degradation as the number of systems increases' is supported by aggregate relative energy errors without statistical error bars. Because the total batch size M is fixed while per-system sample counts are M/R, the stochastic noise per system grows with R; the reported flat behavior is plausible but needs a more precise substantiation. Please report per-system worst-case errors with error bars, state whether the regularization λ in Eq. (18) and the learning rate were kept fixed across R, and confirm that the flat total-energy error does not hide a spread in individual-system errors. This is needed to fully support the central scalability claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (19)] There is a typographical error in the fidelity expression: the ket in the numerator is written as |ψθ(γ+ε⟩| instead of |ψθ(γ+ε)⟩|.
  2. [Methods, Eqs. (15)-(17)] The sentence 'In the absence of this weighting, S would reduce to an unweighted integral, leading to large statistical fluctuations as the number of systems increases' is unclear: Eq. (17) already defines S as the P(γ)-weighted ensemble average of S(γ). Please clarify what 'unweighted' means and how a different weighting would alter the statistical fluctuations.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The color bar in panel (a) is not labeled and the clipping interval [0.0, 0.5] is mentioned only in the caption text. Please label the color bar as the leading eigenvalue χ_max of the quantum geometric tensor and state more explicitly that values above 0.5 are clipped for visualization.
  4. [Fig. 5b] The horizontal and vertical axes appear to be logarithmic, but the axis labels do not indicate this. Please label the axes as log-log and specify the fitted range used to compare Cav(r) with the power law η≈0.382.
  5. [Data availability] The data availability statement says that data are available 'upon request'; since the trained architectures are openly released, please also deposit the numerical data needed to reproduce the histograms in Fig. 6 and the order-parameter maps in Fig. 3, in a public repository.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The multi-system training results are externally benchmarked and not circular; the J1-J2-J3 unsupervised phase-transition 'validation' is self-referential because both the QGT and the order parameters come from the same variational wave function.

  1. other [Results, 'J1-J2-J3 Heisenberg model' (validation of Fig. 3a against Fig. 3b-d); Methods, 'Generalized Fidelity Susceptibility', Eq. (22); order parameters defined in Eqs. (5)-(6).]
    "Comparing the different panels in Fig. 3, we observe a strong correspondence between the phase transition boundaries predicted by fidelity susceptibility and those identified through order parameters. This agreement validates our approach to the unsupervised detection of quantum phase transitions, even in systems with multiple couplings."

    Eq. (22) defines chi_ij(gamma) as the quantum geometric tensor of the variational state: chi_ij = Re{<O_i^dag O_j>_gamma - <O_i^dag>_gamma <O_j>_gamma}, with O_i = d log psi_theta(sigma|gamma)/d gamma^i. The order parameters m^2_Néel, m^2_stripe, and d^2 in Fig. 3b-d are likewise expectation values evaluated on the same |psi_theta(gamma)> via Eqs. (5)-(6). The agreement therefore reduces to a self-consistency check between two functionals of one approximate wave function; it cannot certify that variational QGT peaks coincide with exact ground-state transitions, because a shared variational bias would shift both coherently. The TFIM benchmark (Fig. 2c) is external, but the multi-coupling J1-J2-J3 claim has no independent reference.

full rationale

The core FNQS claims are not circular: the multi-system energies are checked against exact TFIM solutions (Fig. 2a), the random-field magnetization and correlation functions against exact free-fermion results (Figs. 5-6), and the J1-J2 order parameters against ED and QMC on selected lines (Fig. 4). The fixed-batch-size R-scaling claim is an empirical property of the optimization protocol, with test-seed generalization also reported. The only partial circularity is the J1-J2-J3 unsupervised phase-diagram validation: both the QGT 'prediction' and the order parameters used to confirm it are computed from the same variational state, so the agreement is expected if the ansatz is self-consistent and does not independently establish that the variational fidelity susceptibility matches the exact one in this frustrated multi-coupling regime. The SI's explicit statement that FNQS do not extrapolate across phase boundaries is a limitation on generalization, not a circular step, and the authors acknowledge it.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger contains no invented physical entities. The central method is a numerical optimization scheme; its free inputs are hyperparameters and the coupling distribution P(gamma), and the fitted values hc and nu are outputs used for validation. The two domain assumptions that carry the most risk are the smooth representability of the ground-state manifold by one Transformer and the identification of variational geometric-tensor peaks with exact phase transitions.

free parameters (4)
  • Network and optimizer hyperparameters = nl=6-8, nh=12, d=72, patch sizes 4 or 2x2, M=10000-16000, eta=0.03, lambda=1e-4 to 5e-4
    Chosen by hand following prior ViT-NQS work; they are not derived from the target result and presumably affect accuracy.
  • Coupling sampling distribution P(gamma) = uniform over training ranges; for OOD test, support restricted to one-diagonal axes
    The choice of training distribution determines the generalization scope; the paper acknowledges this is application-specific and that out-of-distribution interpolation fails far from the support.
  • Critical field hc/J = 1.00(1)
    Fitted from the data collapse of the FNQS fidelity susceptibility in Fig. 2c inset; used as a validation output rather than a model input.
  • Critical exponent nu = 1.00(2)
    Fitted from the same data collapse; consistent with the 2D Ising universality class.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Variational bound: for each Hamiltonian, ⟨ψ|H|ψ⟩/⟨ψ|ψ⟩ ≥ E0(γ)
    Used to justify minimizing the ensemble loss in Eq. (1).
  • standard math Ensemble TDVP/SR update δθ = -η(S+λI)^{-1}G with S weighted by P(γ) minimizes the ensemble fidelity
    Derived in Methods from a small-epsilon expansion; assumes S is regularizable and the Euler step is stable.
  • domain assumption A fixed-capacity Transformer can represent the ground-state manifold γ → |ψ0(γ)⟩ smoothly over the training distribution
    Load-bearing for generalization and for coupling derivatives; only empirically demonstrated on selected models, and the SI shows it fails across phase boundaries.
  • domain assumption The variational-state coupling-space geometric tensor in Eq. (22) peaks at the exact quantum phase transitions
    Used for the unsupervised phase-diagram claim; not proven, and for the J1-J2-J3 model checked only against the same wave function's order parameters.
  • standard math Free-fermion solution of the random transverse-field Ising chain provides exact benchmarks
    Used to validate Figs. 5-6, following Ref. [58].
  • standard math Finite-size scaling ansatz for fidelity susceptibility near the critical point
    Used for the data collapse in Fig. 2c, following Refs. [31,32,38,39].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Foundation Neural-Networks Quantum States as a Unified Ansatz for Multiple Hamiltonians." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P7GQDDWT

@misc{pith2026250209488,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Foundation Neural-Networks Quantum States as a Unified Ansatz for Multiple Hamiltonians},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P7GQDDWT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09488}
}
read the original abstract

Foundation models are highly versatile neural-network architectures capable of processing different data types, such as text and images, and generalizing across various tasks like classification and generation. Inspired by this success, we propose Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States (FNQS) as an integrated paradigm for studying quantum many-body systems. FNQS leverage key principles of foundation models to define variational wave functions based on a single, versatile architecture that processes multimodal inputs, including spin configurations and Hamiltonian physical couplings. Unlike specialized architectures tailored for individual Hamiltonians, FNQS can generalize to physical Hamiltonians beyond those encountered during training, offering a unified framework adaptable to various quantum systems and tasks. FNQS enable the efficient estimation of quantities that are traditionally challenging or computationally intensive to calculate using conventional methods, particularly disorder-averaged observables. Furthermore, the fidelity susceptibility can be easily obtained to uncover quantum phase transitions without prior knowledge of order parameters. These pretrained models can be efficiently fine-tuned for specific quantum systems. The architectures trained in this paper are publicly available at https://huggingface.co/nqs-models, along with examples for implementing these neural networks in NetKet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09488 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The panel (a) shows a pictorial representation of Founda [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. All the panels refer to the Ising model on a chain [see Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Square magnetization corresponding to the N´eel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. All the panels refer to the random transverse field Ising mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The distribution of the squared magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sequence-Model-Guided Measurement Selection for Quantum State Learning

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A transformer-based 'TGMS' model adaptively chooses quantum measurements and outperforms random selection for property prediction, phase clustering, and tomography, with an emergent preference for boundary measurement...

  2. Quantum Spin Glass in the Two-Dimensional Disordered Heisenberg Model via Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The ground state of the 2D random Heisenberg magnet hosts a stable quantum spin-glass phase for intermediate bond disorder, with a finite overlap order parameter in the thermodynamic limit.

  3. Probing Quantum Spin Systems with Kolmogorov-Arnold Neural Network Quantum States

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SineKAN, a Kolmogorov-Arnold network with sinusoidal activations, accurately represents ground states of 1D spin chains and outperforms RBM, LSTM, and MLP neural quantum states in the J1-J2 model.

  4. Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectives

    quant-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A broad expert white paper sets a European research agenda for combining quantum computing and AI, spanning quantum machine learning, AI-driven quantum control, and foundational questions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Bommasani , author D

    author author R. Bommasani , author D. A. \ Hudson , author E. Adeli , author R. Altman , author S. Arora , author S. von Arx , author M. S. \ Bernstein , author J. Bohg , author A. Bosselut , author E. Brunskill , author E. Brynjolfsson , et al. ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258 title On the opportunities and risks of foundation models ( year 2022 ),\ ...

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Vaswani , author N

    author author A. Vaswani , author N. Shazeer , author N. Parmar , author J. Uszkoreit , author L. Jones , author A. N. \ Gomez , author L. u. \ Kaiser ,\ and\ author I. Polosukhin ,\ title title Attention is all you need ,\ in\ https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf booktitle Advances in Neura...

    2017

  3. [3]

    Devlin , author M.-W

    author author J. Devlin , author M.-W. \ Chang , author K. Lee ,\ and\ author K. Toutanova ,\ title title BERT : Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423 booktitle Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North A merican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:...

    doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423

  4. [4]

    Achiam , author S

    author author J. Achiam , author S. Adler , author S. Agarwal , author L. Ahmad , author I. Akkaya , author F. L. \ Aleman , author D. Almeida , author J. Altenschmidt , author S. Altman , author S. Anadkat , et al. ,\ title title Gpt-4 technical report ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Dosovitskiy , author L

    author author A. Dosovitskiy , author L. Beyer , author A. Kolesnikov , author D. Weissenborn , author X. Zhai , author T. Unterthiner , author M. Dehghani , author M. Minderer , author G. Heigold , author S. Gelly , author J. Uszkoreit ,\ and\ author N. Houlsby ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929 title An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for imag...

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Rives , author J

    author author A. Rives , author J. Meier , author T. Sercu , author S. Goyal , author Z. Lin , author J. Liu , author D. Guo , author M. Ott , author C. L. \ Zitnick , author J. Ma ,\ and\ author R. Fergus ,\ title title Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/...

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2016239118

  7. [7]

    author author J. M. \ Jumper , author R. Evans , author A. Pritzel , author T. Green , author M. Figurnov , author O. Ronneberger , author K. Tunyasuvunakool , author R. Bates , author A. Ž \'i dek , author A. Potapenko , author A. Bridgland , author C. Meyer , author S. A. A. \ Kohl , author A. Ballard , author A. Cowie , author B. Romera-Paredes , autho...

    2021

  8. [8]

    Brown , author B

    author author T. Brown , author B. Mann , author N. Ryder , author M. Subbiah , author J. D. \ Kaplan , author P. Dhariwal , author A. Neelakantan , author P. Shyam , author G. Sastry , author A. Askell , author S. Agarwal , author A. Herbert-Voss , author G. Krueger , author T. Henighan , author R. Child , author A. Ramesh , author D. Ziegler , author J....

    2020

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Carleo \ and\ author M

    author author G. Carleo \ and\ author M. Troyer ,\ title title Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2302 journal journal Science \ volume 355 ,\ pages 602 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Nomura \ and\ author M

    author author Y. Nomura \ and\ author M. Imada ,\ title title Dirac-type nodal spin liquid revealed by refined quantum many-body solver using neural-network wave function, correlation ratio, and level spectroscopy ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031034 journal journal P...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Robledo Moreno , author G

    author author J. Robledo Moreno , author G. Carleo , author A. Georges ,\ and\ author J. Stokes ,\ title title Fermionic wave functions from neural-network constrained hidden states ,\ journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 119 ,\ https://doi....

    doi

  4. [12]

    Roth , author A

    author author C. Roth , author A. Szab\'o ,\ and\ author A. H. \ MacDonald ,\ title title High-accuracy variational monte carlo for frustrated magnets with deep neural networks ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054410 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 108 ,\ pages 05...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Pfau , author J

    author author D. Pfau , author J. S. \ Spencer , author A. G. D. G. \ Matthews ,\ and\ author W. M. C. \ Foulkes ,\ title title Ab initio solution of the many-electron schr\"odinger equation with deep neural networks ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033429 journal ...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Luo \ and\ author B

    author author D. Luo \ and\ author B. K. \ Clark ,\ title title Backflow transformations via neural networks for quantum many-body wave functions ,\ journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 122 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.122.226401 10.1103/physrevlett.122.2...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Sorella ,\ title title Green function monte carlo with stochastic reconfiguration ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4558 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Sorella ,\ title title Green function monte carlo with stochastic reconfiguration ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4558 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 4558 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  8. [16]

    Sorella ,\ title title Wave function optimization in the variational monte carlo method ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.241103 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Sorella ,\ title title Wave function optimization in the variational monte carlo method ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.241103 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 71 ,\ pages 241103 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  9. [17]

    Becca \ and\ author S

    author author F. Becca \ and\ author S. Sorella ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417041 title Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Chen \ and\ author M

    author author A. Chen \ and\ author M. Heyl ,\ title title Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient optimization ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1476 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  11. [19]

    Rende , author L

    author author R. Rende , author L. L. \ Viteritti , author L. Bardone , author F. Becca ,\ and\ author S. Goldt ,\ title title A simple linear algebra identity to optimize large-scale neural network quantum states ,\ journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 7 ,\ https:/...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author L. L. \ Viteritti , author R. Rende ,\ and\ author F. Becca ,\ title title Transformer variational wave functions for frustrated quantum spin systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.236401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 236401 (...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author L. L. \ Viteritti , author R. Rende , author A. Parola , author S. Goldt ,\ and\ author F. Becca ,\ title title Transformer wave function for two dimensional frustrated magnets: Emergence of a spin-liquid phase in the shastry-sutherland model ,\ https://doi.org/1...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Sprague \ and\ author S

    author author K. Sprague \ and\ author S. Czischek ,\ title title Variational monte carlo with large patched transformers ,\ @noop journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 7 ,\ pages 90 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  15. [23]

    Rende \ and\ author L

    author author R. Rende \ and\ author L. L. \ Viteritti ,\ title title Are queries and keys always relevant? a case study on transformer wave functions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ada1a0 journal journal Machine Learning: Science and Technology \ volume 6 ,\ pages 01050...

    doi

  16. [24]

    von Glehn , author J

    author author I. von Glehn , author J. S. \ Spencer ,\ and\ author D. Pfau ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13672 title A self-attention ansatz for ab-initio quantum chemistry ( year 2023 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13672 arXiv:2211.13672 [physics.chem-ph] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Rende , author S

    author author R. Rende , author S. Goldt , author F. Becca ,\ and\ author L. L. \ Viteritti ,\ title title Fine-tuning neural network quantum states ,\ journal journal Physical Review Research \ volume 6 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043280 10.1103/physrevresear...

    doi

  18. [26]

    \ Zhang \ and\ author M

    author author Y.-H. \ Zhang \ and\ author M. Di Ventra ,\ title title Transformer quantum state: A multipurpose model for quantum many-body problems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.075147 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 107 ,\ pages 075147 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Scherbela , author R

    author author M. Scherbela , author R. Reisenhofer , author L. Gerard , author P. Marquetand ,\ and\ author P. Grohs ,\ title title Solving the electronic schrödinger equation for multiple nuclear geometries with weight-sharing deep neural networks ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Gao \ and\ author S

    author author N. Gao \ and\ author S. G \"u nnemann ,\ title title Ab-initio potential energy surfaces by pairing GNN s with neural wave functions ,\ in\ @noop booktitle International Conference on Learning Representations \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  21. [29]

    Gao \ and\ author S

    author author N. Gao \ and\ author S. G \"u nnemann ,\ title title Generalizing neural wave functions ,\ in\ @noop booktitle International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  22. [30]

    Miao , author C.-Y

    author author J. Miao , author C.-Y. \ Hsieh ,\ and\ author S.-X. \ Zhang ,\ title title Neural-network-encoded variational quantum algorithms ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.014053 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 014053 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    Wang , author Y.-H

    author author L. Wang , author Y.-H. \ Liu , author J. Imri s s ka , author P. N. \ Ma ,\ and\ author M. Troyer ,\ title title Fidelity susceptibility made simple: A unified quantum monte carlo approach ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031007 journal journal Phys. Rev. X ...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Campos Venuti \ and\ author P

    author author L. Campos Venuti \ and\ author P. Zanardi ,\ title title Quantum critical scaling of the geometric tensors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.095701 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 095701 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  25. [33]

    Zanardi , author P

    author author P. Zanardi , author P. Giorda ,\ and\ author M. Cozzini ,\ title title Information-theoretic differential geometry of quantum phase transitions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.100603 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 100603 ( year 20...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Yun , author M

    author author S. Yun , author M. Jeong , author R. Kim , author J. Kang ,\ and\ author H. J. \ Kim ,\ title title Graph transformer networks ,\ in\ https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/9d63484abb477c97640154d40595a3bb-Paper.pdf booktitle Advances in Neura...

    2019

  27. [35]

    Sachdev ,\ title title Quantum phase transitions ,\ @noop journal journal Physics world \ volume 12 ,\ pages 33 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    author author S. Sachdev ,\ title title Quantum phase transitions ,\ @noop journal journal Physics world \ volume 12 ,\ pages 33 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  28. [36]

    author author B. Damski ,\ title title Fidelity susceptibility of the quantum ising model in a transverse field: The exact solution ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.052131 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 87 ,\ pages 052131 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author S.-J. \ GU ,\ title title Fidelity approach to quantum phase transitions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217979210056335 journal journal International Journal of Modern Physics B \ volume 24 ,\ pages 4371–4458 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Schwandt , author F

    author author D. Schwandt , author F. Alet ,\ and\ author S. Capponi ,\ title title Quantum monte carlo simulations of fidelity at magnetic quantum phase transitions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.170501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 170501...

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author A. F. \ Albuquerque , author F. Alet , author C. Sire ,\ and\ author S. Capponi ,\ title title Quantum critical scaling of fidelity susceptibility ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.064418 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 81 ,\ pages 064418 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author J. J. \ Binney , author N. J. \ Dowrick , author A. J. \ Fisher ,\ and\ author M. Newman ,\ @noop title The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group \ ( publisher Oxford University Press, Inc. ,\ address USA ,\ year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  33. [41]

    author author M. P. \ Gelfand , author R. R. P. \ Singh ,\ and\ author D. A. \ Huse ,\ title title Zero-temperature ordering in two-dimensional frustrated quantum heisenberg antiferromagnets ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.10801 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 40 ...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Moreo , author E

    author author A. Moreo , author E. Dagotto , author T. Jolicoeur ,\ and\ author J. Riera ,\ title title Incommensurate correlations in the t-j and frustrated spin-1/2 heisenberg models ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.6283 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 42 ,\ page...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Chubukov ,\ title title First-order transition in frustrated quantum antiferromagnets ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.392 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Chubukov ,\ title title First-order transition in frustrated quantum antiferromagnets ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.392 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 44 ,\ pages 392 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991 doi

  36. [44]

    Read \ and\ author S

    author author N. Read \ and\ author S. Sachdev ,\ title title Large-n expansion for frustrated quantum antiferromagnets ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1773 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 66 ,\ pages 1773 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    doi

  37. [45]

    Mambrini , author A

    author author M. Mambrini , author A. L\"auchli , author D. Poilblanc ,\ and\ author F. Mila ,\ title title Plaquette valence-bond crystal in the frustrated heisenberg quantum antiferromagnet on the square lattice ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.144422 journal journal P...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Sindzingre , author N

    author author P. Sindzingre , author N. Shannon ,\ and\ author T. Momoi ,\ title title Phase diagram of the spin-1/2 j1-j2-j3 heisenberg model on the square lattice ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/200/2/022058 journal journal Journal of Physics: Conference Series \ volume...

    doi

  39. [47]

    \ Liu , author J

    author author W.-Y. \ Liu , author J. Hasik , author S.-S. \ Gong , author D. Poilblanc , author W.-Q. \ Chen ,\ and\ author Z.-C. \ Gu ,\ title title Emergence of gapless quantum spin liquid from deconfined quantum critical point ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031039 ...

    doi

  40. [48]

    \ Liu , author D

    author author W.-Y. \ Liu , author D. Poilblanc , author S.-S. \ Gong , author W.-Q. \ Chen ,\ and\ author Z.-C. \ Gu ,\ title title Tensor network study of the spin- 1 2 square-lattice J _ 1 - J _ 2 - J _ 3 model: Incommensurate spiral order, mixed valence-bond solids, and mu...

    doi

  41. [49]

    Calandra Buonaura \ and\ author S

    author author M. Calandra Buonaura \ and\ author S. Sorella ,\ title title Numerical study of the two-dimensional heisenberg model using a green function monte carlo technique with a fixed number of walkers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.11446 journal journal Phys. Rev...

    doi

  42. [50]

    author author A. W. \ Sandvik ,\ title title Finite-size scaling of the ground-state parameters of the two-dimensional heisenberg model ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.11678 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 56 ,\ pages 11678 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [51]

    Capriotti , author F

    author author L. Capriotti , author F. Becca , author A. Parola ,\ and\ author S. Sorella ,\ title title Suppression of dimer correlations in the two-dimensional J _ 1 - J _ 2 heisenberg model: An exact diagonalization study ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.212402 journa...

    doi

  44. [52]

    Lacroix , author P

    author author C. Lacroix , author P. Mendels ,\ and\ author F. Mila ,\ title title Introduction to frustrated magnetism ,\ @noop journal journal Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Volume 164. ISBN 978-...

    2011

  45. [53]

    Parisi ,\ title title Nobel lecture: Multiple equilibria ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 95 ,\ pages 030501 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    author author G. Parisi ,\ title title Nobel lecture: Multiple equilibria ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 95 ,\ pages 030501 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  46. [54]

    author author D. A. \ Abanin , author E. Altman , author I. Bloch ,\ and\ author M. Serbyn ,\ title title Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 91 ,\ pages 021001 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  47. [55]

    Sierant , author M

    author author P. Sierant , author M. Lewenstein , author A. Scardicchio , author L. Vidmar ,\ and\ author J. Zakrzewski ,\ title title Many-body localization in the age of classical computing ,\ @noop journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 88 ,\ pages 026502 (...

    2025

  48. [56]

    author author B. M. \ McCoy \ and\ author T. T. \ Wu ,\ title title Theory of a two-dimensional ising model with random impurities. i. thermodynamics ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 176 ,\ pages 631 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968

  49. [57]

    author author D. S. \ Fisher ,\ title title Random transverse field ising spin chains ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.534 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 534 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  50. [58]

    author author A. P. \ Young \ and\ author H. Rieger ,\ title title Numerical study of the random transverse-field ising spin chain ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.8486 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 53 ,\ pages 8486 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    doi

  51. [59]

    Krämer , author J

    author author C. Krämer , author J. A. \ Koziol , author A. Langheld , author M. Hörmann ,\ and\ author K. P. \ Schmidt ,\ title title Quantum-critical properties of the one- and two-dimensional random transverse-field ising model from large-scale quantum monte carlo simulatio...

    doi

  52. [60]

    \ Hu , author F

    author author W.-J. \ Hu , author F. Becca , author A. Parola ,\ and\ author S. Sorella ,\ title title Direct evidence for a gapless Z _ 2 spin liquid by frustrating n\'eel antiferromagnetism ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.060402 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 8...

    doi

  53. [61]

    Coldea , author D

    author author R. Coldea , author D. A. \ Tennant , author A. M. \ Tsvelik ,\ and\ author Z. Tylczynski ,\ title title Experimental realization of a 2d fractional quantum spin liquid ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1335 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 86 ,\ ...

    doi

  54. [62]

    Heidarian , author S

    author author D. Heidarian , author S. Sorella ,\ and\ author F. Becca ,\ title title Spin- 1 2 heisenberg model on the anisotropic triangular lattice: From magnetism to a one-dimensional spin liquid ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.012404 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ ...

    doi

  55. [63]

    Hasik \ and\ author P

    author author J. Hasik \ and\ author P. Corboz ,\ title title Incommensurate order with translationally invariant projected entangled-pair states: Spiral states and quantum spin liquid on the anisotropic triangular lattice ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.176502 jour...

    doi

  56. [64]

    Wolf , author L

    author author T. Wolf , author L. Debut , author V. Sanh , author J. Chaumond , author C. Delangue , author A. Moi , author P. Cistac , author T. Rault , author R. Louf , author M. Funtowicz , author J. Davison , author S. Shleifer , author P. von Platen , author C. Ma , autho...

    2020

  57. [65]

    Vicentini , author D

    author author F. Vicentini , author D. Hofmann , author A. Szabó , author D. Wu , author C. Roth , author C. Giuliani , author G. Pescia , author J. Nys , author V. Vargas-Calderón , author N. Astrakhantsev ,\ and\ author G. Carleo ,\ title title NetKet 3: Machine Learning Too...

    doi

  58. [66]

    Choo , author A

    author author K. Choo , author A. Mezzacapo ,\ and\ author G. Carleo ,\ title title Fermionic neural-network states for ab-initio electronic structure ,\ @noop journal journal Nature communications \ volume 11 ,\ pages 2368 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  59. [67]

    Hermann , author J

    author author J. Hermann , author J. Spencer , author K. Choo , author A. Mezzacapo , author W. M. C. \ Foulkes , author D. Pfau , author G. Carleo ,\ and\ author F. No \'e ,\ title title Ab initio quantum chemistry with neural-network wavefunctions ,\ @noop journal journal Na...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Scherbela , author L

    author author M. Scherbela , author L. Gerard ,\ and\ author P. Grohs ,\ title title Towards a transferable fermionic neural wavefunction for molecules ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44216-9 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 15 ,\ pages 120 ...

    doi

  61. [69]

    Sinibaldi , author D

    author author A. Sinibaldi , author D. Hendry , author F. Vicentini ,\ and\ author G. Carleo ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11778 title Time-dependent neural galerkin method for quantum dynamics ( year 2024 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11778 arXiv:2412.11778 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    author author A. V. \ de Walle , author M. Schmitt ,\ and\ author A. Bohrdt ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11830 title Many-body dynamics with explicitly time-dependent neural quantum states ( year 2024 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11830 arXiv:2412.11830 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Yuan , author S

    author author X. Yuan , author S. Endo , author Q. Zhao , author Y. Li ,\ and\ author S. C. \ Benjamin ,\ title title Theory of variational quantum simulation ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-10-07-191 journal journal Quantum \ volume 3 ,\ pages 191 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  64. [72]

    Schmitt \ and\ author M

    author author M. Schmitt \ and\ author M. Heyl ,\ title title Quantum many-body dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.100503 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 100503 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  65. [73]

    Stokes , author J

    author author J. Stokes , author J. Izaac , author N. Killoran ,\ and\ author G. Carleo ,\ title title Quantum natural gradient ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-05-25-269 journal journal Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 269 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    Carrasquilla \ and\ author R

    author author J. Carrasquilla \ and\ author R. G. \ Melko ,\ title title Machine learning phases of matter ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4035 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 431–434 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    author author E. P. L. \ van Nieuwenburg , author Y.-H. \ Liu ,\ and\ author S. D. \ Huber ,\ title title Learning phase transitions by confusion ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4037 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 435–439 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  68. [76]

    \ Huang , author R

    author author H.-Y. \ Huang , author R. Kueng ,\ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ title title Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1050–1057 ( year 2...

    doi

  69. [77]

    \ Huang , author R

    author author H.-Y. \ Huang , author R. Kueng , author G. Torlai , author V. V. \ Albert ,\ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ title title Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems ,\ journal journal Science \ volume 377 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk3...

    doi

  70. [78]

    A simple linear algebra identity to optimize large-scale neural network quantum states

    Riccardo Rende, Luciano Loris Viteritti, Lorenzo Bardone, Federico Becca, and Sebastian Goldt. A simple linear algebra identity to optimize large-scale neural network quantum states. Communications Physics , 7(1), August 2024

    2024

  71. [79]

    Transformer wave function for two dimensional frustrated magnets: Emergence of a spin-liquid phase in the shastry-sutherland model

    Luciano Loris Viteritti, Riccardo Rende, Alberto Parola, Sebastian Goldt, and Federico Becca. Transformer wave function for two dimensional frustrated magnets: Emergence of a spin-liquid phase in the shastry-sutherland model. Phys. Rev. B , 111:134411, Apr 2025

    2025

  72. [80]

    Becca and S

    F. Becca and S. Sorella. Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems . Cambridge University Press, 2017

    2017

  73. [81]

    Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, Filippo Vicentini, Nikita Astrakhantsev, Federico Becca, Xiaodong Cao, Juan Carrasquilla, Francesco Ferrari, Antoine Georges, Mohamed Hibat-Allah, Masatoshi Imada, Andreas M. Läuchli, Guglielmo Mazzola, Antonio Mezzacapo, Andrew Millis, Javier Robledo ...

    2024

  74. [82]

    Direct evidence for a gapless Z _ 2 spin liquid by frustrating n\'eel antiferromagnetism

    Wen-Jun Hu, Federico Becca, Alberto Parola, and Sandro Sorella. Direct evidence for a gapless Z _ 2 spin liquid by frustrating n\'eel antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. B , 88:060402, Aug 2013

    2013

  75. [83]

    Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient optimization

    Ao Chen and Markus Heyl. Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient optimization. Nature Physics , 20(9):1476--1481, 2024

    2024

  76. [84]

    Nomura and M

    Y. Nomura and M. Imada. Dirac-type nodal spin liquid revealed by refined quantum many-body solver using neural-network wave function, correlation ratio, and level spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X , 11:031034, Aug 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.