Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LangProBe: a Language Programs Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.20315 v1 pith:J3J5LDU2 submitted 2025-02-27 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LG
keywords languagelangprobeprogramsarchitecturesmodelsbenchmarkcompositionsfirst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Composing language models (LMs) into multi-step language programs and automatically optimizing their modular prompts is now a mainstream paradigm for building AI systems, but the tradeoffs in this space have only scarcely been studied before. We introduce LangProBe, the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating the architectures and optimization strategies for language programs, with over 2000 combinations of tasks, architectures, optimizers, and choices of LMs. Using LangProBe, we are the first to study the impact of program architectures and optimizers (and their compositions together and with different models) on tradeoffs of quality and cost. We find that optimized language programs offer strong cost--quality Pareto improvement over raw calls to models, but simultaneously demonstrate that human judgment (or empirical decisions) about which compositions to pursue is still necessary for best performance. We will open source the code and evaluation data for LangProBe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is It Time To Treat Prompts As Code? A Multi-Use Case Study For Prompt Optimization Using DSPy

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A five-task case study shows DSPy prompt optimization can improve LLM accuracy on some tasks, notably contradiction detection (46.2% to 64.0%), but results vary and no code or data are released.

Pith tools