The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2503.02264 · v1 · submitted 2025-03-04 · physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Ultrafast one-chip optical receiver with functional metasurface

Go Soma , Tomohiro Akazawa , Eisaku Kato , Kento Komatsu , Mitsuru Takenaka , Yoshiaki Nakano , Takuo Tanemura This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-05-23 01:53 UTCgrok-4.3open to challenge →

classification physics.optics physics.app-ph
keywords metasurfaceoptical receiverphotodetectorsphotonic integrated circuitshigh-speed detectioncoherent detectionsilicon nanopostsparallel signals
0
0 comments X

The pith

A silicon nanopost metasurface on a photodetector chip replaces conventional photonic circuits to enable parallel high-speed optical detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an optical receiver that integrates a thin metasurface made of silicon nanoposts with membrane photodetectors on a single chip. This metasurface performs the functions of beam splitting, polarization management, and phase control for light coming straight onto the chip, which conventional waveguide-based circuits cannot do efficiently for many parallel signals. As a result, the device detects optical signals at high speeds in different formats, including 320 gigabits per second across four channels at once and coherent detection at 240 gigabits per second. Readers would care if this leads to more compact receivers that handle more data channels without the size limits of traditional photonic chips.

Core claim

The metasurface provides all the functionalities of conventional PICs for normal-incident spatially parallelized light, enabling high-speed detection of optical signals in various modulation formats, including simultaneous detection of 320-gigabits-per-second four-channel signals and coherent detection of a 240-gigabits-per-second signal.

What carries the argument

Thin metasurface of silicon nanoposts that delivers beam splitting, polarization handling, and phase control for normally incident light.

If this is right

  • Enables simultaneous detection of 320 Gbps four-channel signals.
  • Supports coherent detection of 240 Gbps signals.
  • Handles various modulation formats on a compact chip.
  • Exploits intensity, phase, and polarization degrees of freedom for parallel light.
  • Provides ultrabroad bandwidth and high spatial parallelism without waveguide constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could allow scaling to more than four channels by enlarging the metasurface area.
  • May lead to smaller and cheaper optical receivers for data centers and telecommunications.
  • Opens possibilities for integrating metasurfaces with other components for complete on-chip transceivers.
  • Could inspire similar metasurface approaches in optical sensing or computing applications.

Load-bearing premise

The silicon nanopost metasurface can perform all conventional PIC functions for normally incident light without unacceptable losses, crosstalk, or bandwidth limits.

What would settle it

An experiment showing that the device cannot achieve error-free detection at the claimed 320 Gbps four-channel rate or 240 Gbps coherent rate would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.02264 by Eisaku Kato, Go Soma, Kento Komatsu, Mitsuru Takenaka, Takuo Tanemura, Tomohiro Akazawa, Yoshiaki Nakano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: One-chip optical receiver platform with an integrated Si MS and membrane InGaAs PDA. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Results of an ML-integrated IM-DD receiver. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results of an ML-integrated 4-channel IM-DD receiver with an MCF. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SVR with an integrated polarization-sorting MS. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CR with an integrated MS operating as an optical hybrid. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-speed optical receivers are crucial in modern optical communication systems. While complex photonic integrated circuits (PICs) are widely employed to harness the full degrees of freedom (DOFs) of light for efficient data transmission, their waveguide nature inherently constrains two-dimensional spatial scaling to accommodate a large number of optical signals in parallel. Here, we present a novel optical receiver platform that fully exploits the high spatial parallelism and ultrabroad bandwidth of light, while leveraging all DOFs - intensity, phase, and polarization. Our solution integrates a thin metasurface, composed of silicon nanoposts, with ultrafast membrane photodetectors on a compact chip. The metasurface provides all the functionalities of conventional PICs for normal-incident spatially parallelized light, enabling high-speed detection of optical signals in various modulation formats, including simultaneous detection of 320-gigabits-per-second four-channel signals and coherent detection of a 240-gigabits-per-second signal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a compact optical receiver integrating a thin silicon nanopost metasurface with membrane photodetectors. The metasurface is claimed to replicate conventional PIC functionalities (beam splitting, polarization handling, phase control) for normally incident, spatially parallelized light, enabling high-speed detection across modulation formats with reported performance of simultaneous 320 Gbps four-channel signals and 240 Gbps coherent detection.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold, the approach offers a route to higher spatial parallelism than waveguide-based PICs while exploiting all light DOFs in a planar, thin-film format. This could impact high-capacity optical communications by reducing footprint and enabling parallel channel scaling, provided the metasurface metrics meet the requirements for the stated data rates.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states specific performance numbers (320 Gbps four-channel, 240 Gbps coherent) but does not reference the figures, tables, or sections containing the supporting eye diagrams, BER curves, or device characterization data.
  2. Provide quantitative metasurface metrics (insertion loss, crosstalk, polarization extinction ratio, and operational bandwidth) in the results section to allow verification that these values support the claimed data rates without degradation.
  3. Include fabrication details (nanopost dimensions, material stack, alignment tolerances) and baseline comparisons to conventional PIC receivers to strengthen the claims of functional equivalence and compactness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive summary, positive assessment of significance, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental demonstration

full rationale

The paper presents a device fabrication and experimental measurement of a metasurface-integrated receiver. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or mathematical predictions appear in the abstract or described content. The central claim is supported by measured data rates and device performance rather than any self-referential calculation or self-citation chain. This matches the default case of a self-contained experimental result with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract relies on standard electromagnetic and semiconductor physics without introducing new entities or fitted parameters; the design assumes known behavior of silicon nanoposts and membrane photodetectors under normal incidence.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Electromagnetic properties of silicon nanoposts and membrane photodetectors follow established models from prior literature.
    The claim that the metasurface replicates PIC functions depends on these standard assumptions about light propagation and detection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1257 out tokens · 64215 ms · 2026-05-23T01:53:37.370863+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    𝐼#𝐼$𝐼% 𝑆

    (see Methods and Extended Data Fig. 5 for detailed design methods). Figure 4b shows the fabricated device. Figure 4c shows the measured photocurrent at four PDs, I = ( I1, I2, I3, I4)t (left panel), and the Stokes vector, Smeas = (S1, S2, S3)t (center panel), which is retrieved from I. The results are plotted as we rotate a half-wave plate (HWP) in three ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, and Z. Gaburro, Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction, Science 334, 333 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Khorasaninejad and F

    M. Khorasaninejad and F. Capasso, Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic components, Science 358, eaam8100 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Arbabi and A

    A. Arbabi and A. Faraon, Advances in optical metalenses, Nat. Photonics 17, 16 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    T. Gu, H. J. Kim, C. Rivero-Baleine, and J. Hu, Reconfigurable metasurfaces towards commercial success, Nat. Photonics 17, 48 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    A. I. Kuznetsov, M. L. Brongersma, J. Yao, M. K. Chen, U. Levy, D. P. Tsai, N. I. Zheludev, A. Faraon, A. Arbabi, N. Yu, D. Chanda, K. B. Crozier, A. V. Kildishev, H. Wang, J. K. W. Yang, J. G. Valentine, P. Genevet, J. A. Fan, O. D. Miller, A. Majumdar, J. E. Fr¨ och, D. Brady, F. Heide, A. Veeraraghavan, N. Engheta, A. Al` u, A. Polman, H. A. Atwater, P...

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    S. T. Ha, Q. Li, J. K. W. Yang, H. V. Demir, M. L. Brongersma, and A. I. Kuznetsov, Optoelectronic metadevices, Science 386, eadm7442 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    W. T. Chen, A. Y. Zhu, V. Sanjeev, M. Khorasaninejad, Z. Shi, E. Lee, and F. Capasso, A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 220 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Shrestha, A

    S. Shrestha, A. C. Overvig, M. Lu, A. Stein, and N. Yu, Broadband achromatic dielectric metalenses, Light Sci Appl 7, 85 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    S. Wang, P. C. Wu, V.-C. Su, Y.-C. Lai, M.-K. Chen, H. Y. Kuo, B. H. Chen, Y. H. Chen, T.-T. Huang, J.-H. Wang, R.-M. Lin, C.-H. Kuan, T. Li, Z. Wang, S. Zhu, and D. P. Tsai, A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 227 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    W. T. Chen, A. Y. Zhu, J. Sisler, Z. Bharwani, and F. Capasso, A broadband achromatic polarization-insensitive metalens consisting of anisotropic nanostructures, Nat. Commun. 10, 355 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Y. Hu, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Yang, X. Ou, L. Li, X. Kong, X. Liu, C.-W. Qiu, and H. Duan, Asymptotic dispersion engineering for ultra-broadband meta-optics, Nat. Commun. 14, 6649 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    N. A. Rubin, G. D’Aversa, P. Chevalier, Z. Shi, W. T. Chen, and F. Capasso, Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera, Science 365, eaax1839 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Arbabi, S

    E. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, A. Arbabi, and A. Faraon, Full-Stokes imaging polarimetry using dielectric metasurfaces, ACS Photonics 5, 3132 (2018). 9

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    A. Pors, M. G. Nielsen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Plasmonic metagratings for simultaneous determination of Stokes parameters, Optica 2, 716 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Z. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Feng, M. Zhao, Z. Wan, L. Zhu, J. Liu, Y. Huang, J. Xia, and M. Wegener, Generalized Hartmann- Shack array of dielectric metalens sub-arrays for polarimetric beam profiling, Nat. Commun. 9, 4607 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Y. D. Shah, A. C. Dada, J. P. Grant, D. R. S. Cumming, C. Altuzarra, T. S. Nowack, A. Lyons, M. Clerici, and D. Faccio, An all-dielectric metasurface polarimeter, ACS Photonics 9, 3245 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    G. Soma, K. Komatsu, C. Ren, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Metasurface-enabled non-orthogonal four-output polarization splitter for non-redundant full-stokes imaging, Opt. Express 32, 34207 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Faraji-Dana, E

    M. Faraji-Dana, E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, H. Kwon, and A. Faraon, Compact folded metasurface spectrometer, Nat. Commun. 9, 4196 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    A. Y. Zhu, W. T. Chen, J. Sisler, K. M. A. Yousef, E. Lee, Y.-W. Huang, C.-W. Qiu, and F. Capasso, Compact aberration-corrected spectrometers in the visible using dispersion-tailored metasurfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1801144 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Miyata, N

    M. Miyata, N. Nemoto, K. Shikama, F. Kobayashi, and T. Hashimoto, Full-color-sorting metalenses for high-sensitivity image sensors, Optica 8, 1596 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    X. Zou, Y. Zhang, R. Lin, G. Gong, S. Wang, S. Zhu, and Z. Wang, Pixel-level Bayer-type colour router based on metasurfaces, Nat. Commun. 13, 3288 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    X. Ni, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, Metasurface holograms for visible light, Nat. Commun. 4, 2807 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Zheng, H

    G. Zheng, H. M¨ uhlenbernd, M. Kenney, G. Li, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 308 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    B. Wang, F. Dong, Q.-T. Li, D. Yang, C. Sun, J. Chen, Z. Song, L. Xu, W. Chu, Y.-F. Xiao, Q. Gong, and Y. Li, Visible-frequency dielectric metasurfaces for multiwavelength achromatic and highly dispersive holograms, Nano Lett. 16, 5235 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Arbabi, Y

    A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, and A. Faraon, Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with sub- wavelength spatial resolution and high transmission, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 937 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    J. P. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 113901 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    H. Ren, X. Fang, J. Jang, J. B¨ urger, J. Rho, and S. A. Maier, Complex-amplitude metasurface-based orbital angular momentum holography in momentum space, Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 948 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Y. Bao, F. Nan, J. Yan, X. Yang, C.-W. Qiu, and B. Li, Observation of full-parameter Jones matrix in bilayer metasurface, Nat. Commun. 13, 7550 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Zaidi, N

    A. Zaidi, N. A. Rubin, M. L. Meretska, L. W. Li, A. H. Dorrah, J.-S. Park, and F. Capasso, Metasurface-enabled single-shot and complete mueller matrix imaging, Nat. Photonics , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Lee, J.-Y

    G.-Y. Lee, J.-Y. Hong, S. Hwang, S. Moon, H. Kang, S. Jeon, H. Kim, J.-H. Jeong, and B. Lee, Metasurface eyepiece for augmented reality, Nat. Commun. 9, 4562 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    W.-J. Joo, J. Kyoung, M. Esfandyarpour, S.-H. Lee, H. Koo, S. Song, Y.-N. Kwon, S. H. Song, J. C. Bae, A. Jo, M.-J. Kwon, S. H. Han, S.-H. Kim, S. Hwang, and M. L. Brongersma, Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch, Science 370, 459 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Z. Li, P. Lin, Y.-W. Huang, J.-S. Park, W. T. Chen, Z. Shi, C.-W. Qiu, J.-X. Cheng, and F. Capasso, Meta-optics achieves RGB- achromatic focusing for virtual reality, Sci. Adv. 7, eabe4458 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Z. Li, R. Pestourie, J.-S. Park, Y.-W. Huang, S. G. Johnson, and F. Capasso, Inverse design enables large-scale high-performance meta-optics reshaping virtual reality, Nat. Commun. 13, 2409 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    D. N. Neshev and A. E. Miroshnichenko, Enabling smart vision with metasurfaces, Nat. Photonics 17, 26 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Gopakumar, G.-Y

    M. Gopakumar, G.-Y. Lee, S. Choi, B. Chao, Y. Peng, J. Kim, and G. Wetzstein, Full-colour 3D holographic augmented-reality displays with metasurface waveguides, Nature 629, 791 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    D. J. Richardson, J. M. Fini, and L. E. Nelson, Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres, Nat. Photonics 7, 354 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Mizuno, H

    T. Mizuno, H. Takara, A. Sano, and Y. Miyamoto, Dense space-division multiplexed transmission systems using multi-core and multi-mode fiber, J. Lightwave Technol. 34, 582 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    B. J. Puttnam, G. Rademacher, and R. S. Lu´ ıs, Space-division multiplexing for optical fiber communications, Optica 8, 1186 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Kikuchi, Fundamentals of coherent optical fiber communications, J

    K. Kikuchi, Fundamentals of coherent optical fiber communications, J. Lightwave Technol. 34, 157 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    P. Dong, X. Liu, S. Chandrasekhar, L. L. Buhl, R. Aroca, and Y. K. Chen, Monolithic silicon photonic integrated circuits for compact 100 +Gb/s coherent optical receivers and transmitters, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 6100108 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Ogiso, J

    Y. Ogiso, J. Ozaki, Y. Ueda, N. Kashio, N. Kikuchi, E. Yamada, H. Tanobe, S. Kanazawa, H. Yamazaki, Y. Ohiso, T. Fujii, and M. Kohtoku, Over 67 GHz bandwidth and 1.5 V V π InP-based optical IQ modulator with n-i-p-n heterostructure, J. Lightwave Technol. 35, 1450 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    H. Yagi, T. Kaneko, N. Kono, Y. Yoneda, K. Uesaka, M. Ekawa, M. Takechi, and H. Shoji, InP-based monolithically integrated photonic devices for digital coherent transmission, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 6100411 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Porto, M

    S. Porto, M. Chitgarha, I. Leung, R. Maher, R. Going, S. Wolf, P. Studenkov, J. Zhang, H. Hodaei, T. Frost, H.-S. Tsai, S. Buggaveeti, A. Rashidinejad, A. Yekani, R. M. Nejad, M. I. Olmedo, S. Kerns, J. Diniz, D. Pavinski, R. Brigham, B. Foo, M. Al-Khateeb, S. Koenig, P. Samra, M. Missey, V. Dominic, H. Sun, S. Sanders, J. Osenbach, S. Corzine, P. Evans, ...

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    M. Xu, M. He, H. Zhang, J. Jian, Y. Pan, X. Liu, L. Chen, X. Meng, H. Chen, Z. Li, X. Xiao, S. Yu, S. Yu, and X. Cai, High- performance coherent optical modulators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform, Nat. Commun. 11, 3911 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Marchetti, C

    R. Marchetti, C. Lacava, L. Carroll, K. Gradkowski, and P. Minzioni, Coupling strategies for silicon photonics integrated chips [invited], Photon. Res. 7, 201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    J. Oh, K. Li, J. Yang, W. T. Chen, M.-J. Li, P. Dainese, and F. Capasso, Adjoint-optimized metasurfaces for compact mode-division multiplexing, ACS Photonics 9, 929 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    J. Oh, J. Yang, L. Marra, A. H. Dorrah, A. Palmieri, P. Dainese, and F. Capasso, Metasurfaces for free-space coupling to multicore fibers, J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 2385 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    G. Soma, Y. Nomoto, T. Umezawa, Y. Yoshida, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Compact and scalable polarimetric self-coherent receiver using a dielectric metasurface, Optica 10, 604 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Komatsu, G

    K. Komatsu, G. Soma, S. Ishimura, H. Takahashi, T. Tsuritani, M. Suzuki, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Scalable multi-core 10 dual-polarization coherent receiver using a metasurface optical hybrid, J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 4013 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Komatsu, S

    K. Komatsu, S. Ishimura, C. Ren, G. Soma, H. Takahashi, M. Suzuki, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Metasurface-based coherent receiver insensitive to LO polarization, in Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OFC) 2024 , p. Th4B.2

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    C. Ren, K. Komatsu, G. Soma, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Metasurface-based functional optical splitter for a spatially parallelized dual-polarization coherent modulator, Opt. Lett. 49, 7238 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Nozaki, S

    K. Nozaki, S. Matsuo, T. Fujii, K. Takeda, M. Ono, A. Shakoor, E. Kuramochi, and M. Notomi, Photonic-crystal nano-photodetector with ultrasmall capacitance for on-chip light-to-voltage conversion without an amplifier, Optica 3, 483 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    L. Shen, Y. Jiao, W. Yao, Z. Cao, J. P. van Engelen, G. Roelkens, M. K. Smit, and J. J. G. M. van der Tol, High-bandwidth uni-traveling carrier waveguide photodetector on an InP-membrane-on-silicon platform, Opt. Express 24, 8290 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    J. S. Tyo, D. L. Goldstein, D. B. Chenault, and J. A. Shaw, Review of passive imaging polarimetry for remote sensing applications, Appl. Opt. 45, 5453 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Tanemura, T

    T. Tanemura, T. Suganuma, and Y. Nakano, Sensitivity analysis of photonic integrated direct-detection Stokes-vector receiver, J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 447 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    G. Soma, W. Yanwachirakul, T. Miyazaki, E. Kato, B. Onodera, R. Tanomura, T. Fukui, S. Ishimura, M. Sugiyama, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, Ultra-broadband surface-normal coherent optical receiver with nanometallic polarizers, ACS Photonics 9, 2842 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    S. Yun, S. Roh, S. Lee, H. Park, M. Lim, S. Ahn, and H. Choo, Highly efficient color separation and focusing in the sub-micron CMOS image sensor, in IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2021 , pp. 30.1.1–30.1.4

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Uenoyama and R

    S. Uenoyama and R. Ota, Monolithic integration of metalens in silicon photomultiplier for improved photodetection efficiency, Adv. Opt. Mater. 10, 2102707 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Y. Yang, J. Seong, M. Choi, J. Park, G. Kim, H. Kim, J. Jeong, C. Jung, J. Kim, G. Jeon, et al. , Integrated metasurfaces for re-envisioning a near-future disruptive optical platform, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 152 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Wenger, R

    T. Wenger, R. Muller, C. J. Hill, A. Fisher, D. Z. Ting, D. Wilson, S. D. Gunapala, and A. Soibel, Infrared nBn detectors monolithically integrated with metasurface-based optical concentrators, Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 181109 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    M. R. Lien, N. Wang, T. Wenger, H. Wang, S. D. Gunapala, and M. L. Povinelli, An all-silicon metalens integrated with a mid-wave infrared black phosphorus photodiode, Adv. Opt. Mater. 12, 2301952 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Xie, P.-N

    Y.-Y. Xie, P.-N. Ni, Q.-H. Wang, Q. Kan, G. Briere, P.-P. Chen, Z.-Z. Zhao, A. Delga, H.-R. Ren, H.-D. Chen, C. Xu, and P. Genevet, Metasurface-integrated vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers for programmable directional lasing emissions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 125 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    D. Wen, J. Meng, J. J. Cadusch, and K. B. Crozier, VCSELs with on-facet metasurfaces for polarization state generation and detection, Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2001780 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Fu, P.-N

    P. Fu, P.-N. Ni, B. Wu, X.-Z. Pei, Q.-H. Wang, P.-P. Chen, C. Xu, Q. Kan, W.-G. Chu, and Y.-Y. Xie, Metasurface enabled on-chip generation and manipulation of vector beams from vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers, Adv. Mater. 35, 2204286 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Zheng, P.-N

    C.-L. Zheng, P.-N. Ni, Y.-Y. Xie, and P. Genevet, On-chip light control of semiconductor optoelectronic devices using integrated metasurfaces, Opt. Elect. Adv. , 240159 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    P. J. Winzer and D. T. Neilson, From scaling disparities to integrated parallelism: A decathlon for a decade, J. Lightwave Technol. 35, 1099 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    D. A. B. Miller, Attojoule optoelectronics for low-energy information processing and communications, J. Lightwave Technol. 35, 346 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    P. J. Winzer, The future of communications is massively parallel, J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 15, 783 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Wang, J.-Y

    J. Wang, J.-Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing, Nat. Photonics 6, 488 (2012)

    work page 2012

  71. [71]

    Y. He, P. Wang, C. Wang, J. Liu, H. Ye, X. Zhou, Y. Li, S. Chen, X. Zhang, and D. Fan, All-optical signal processing in structured light multiplexing with dielectric meta-optics, ACS Photonics 7, 135 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    S. Chen, Z. Xie, H. Ye, X. Wang, Z. Guo, Y. He, Y. Li, X. Yuan, and D. Fan, Cylindrical vector beam multiplexer/demultiplexer using off-axis polarization control, Light Sci Appl 10, 222 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Horst, B

    Y. Horst, B. I. Bitachon, L. Kulmer, J. Brun, T. Blatter, J.-M. Conan, A. Montmerle-Bonnefois, J. Montri, B. Sorrente, C. B. Lim, N. V´ edrenne, D. Matter, L. Pommarel, B. Baeuerle, and J. Leuthold, Tbit/s line-rate satellite feeder links enabled by coherent modulation and full-adaptive optics, Light Sci. Appl. 12, 153 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Hamerly, L

    R. Hamerly, L. Bernstein, A. Sludds, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, and D. Englund, Large-scale optical neural networks based on photoelectric multiplication, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021032 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    Wang, S.-Y

    T. Wang, S.-Y. Ma, L. G. Wright, T. Onodera, B. C. Richard, and P. L. McMahon, An optical neural network using less than 1 photon per multiplication, Nat. Commun. 13, 123 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Z. Chen, A. Sludds, R. Davis, I. Christen, L. Bernstein, L. Ateshian, T. Heuser, N. Heermeier, J. A. Lott, S. Reitzenstein, R. Hamerly, and D. Englund, Deep learning with coherent VCSEL neural networks, Nat. Photonics 17, 723 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    Martin, D

    A. Martin, D. Dodane, L. Leviandier, D. Dolfi, A. Naughton, P. O’Brien, T. Spuessens, R. Baets, G. Lepage, P. Verheyen, P. De Heyn, P. Absil, P. Feneyrou, and J. Bourderionnet, Photonic integrated circuit-based FMCW coherent LiDAR, J. Lightwave Technol. 36, 4640 (2018)

    work page 2018

  78. [78]

    Riemensberger, A

    J. Riemensberger, A. Lukashchuk, M. Karpov, W. Weng, E. Lucas, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb, Nature 581, 164 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Rogers, A

    C. Rogers, A. Y. Piggott, D. J. Thomson, R. F. Wiser, I. E. Opris, S. A. Fortune, A. J. Compston, A. Gondarenko, F. Meng, X. Chen, G. T. Reed, and R. Nicolaescu, A universal 3D imaging sensor on a silicon photonics platform, Nature 590, 256 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    J.-H. Han, F. Boeuf, J. Fujikata, S. Takahashi, S. Takagi, and M. Takenaka, Efficient low-loss InGaAsP/Si hybrid MOS optical modulator, Nat. Photonics 11, 486 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.